All HHS comments · page 125

I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure.

I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence.

I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health.

Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.

I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure.

As a very concerned mother and now grand-mother and Holistic Health Care Advocate for family, friends and many healing groups I learned already as a young person about all good and harmful Earth Earth radiations. A topic well known to professionals and families in Germany for decades but sadly ignored and even villified and fought over here! Family members and I have always been very sensitive to these radiations, even leading to cancer which had been diagnosed and confirmed by their doctors. I would have a constant headache 24/7 right away and even receive electric shocks by just holding a cell phone--already before the more intense 4G and 5G Smart phones and in addition to those smart Meters and huge cell towers were built!! My search was therefore focused on finding protection from these harmful rays, spending ( investing) initially over $4,000 to protect my home, and so I was always led to more and more inventors who offered devices which could protect us personally from these rays. But people are being kept so ignorant over here and many get so sick and have to suffer needlessly because all their specialists cannot find the cause. Friends of mine here in Co. and in Santa Fe were on their death bed and were given up when they read the book by Arthur Firstenberg which helped them improve but not to full recovery. So, please, do not just follow the money because technology can be created for a higher expense!

So I urge you to establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health.

Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.

While EMFs affect all ages, children are uniquely vulnerable and deserve special consideration. They are exposed to wireless radiation at increasingly young ages, often beginning during pregnancy and continuing throughout childhood and adulthood in their homes, schools, communities, and workplaces. The widespread use of screens and wireless devices has become normalized and encouraged, while questions about hazardous, long-term and cumulative exposure effects remain routinely ignored by federal regulatory agencies and government authorities. The FCC’s current RF exposure guidelines were established in 1996 and are fundamentally flawed and outdated. Wireless technology and infrastructure has exploded since the guidelines were introduced, and yet the industry has actively suppressed the extensive body of scientific literature that clearly demonstrates harm to people and the environment. Furthermore, federal regulatory agencies have yet to demonstrate to the public that the FCC’s decades-old RF exposure guidelines adequately protect children, other vulnerable populations and the environment from the risks of exposure. Rather than continuing to dramatically expand population-wide wireless radiation exposure, we should exercise a precautionary approach when it comes to wireless and take this opportunity to thoroughly examine the current state of scientific literature and conduct new studies that appropriately consider the long-term consequences of ubiquitous and cumulative exposure to current and future wireless environments. That means supporting independent research into the health and developmental effects of RF radiation, particularly the effects on children, pregnant women, and other vulnerable populations. Additionally, it is equally critical that federal regulatory agencies are transparent about the body of scientific literature that is used to establish exposure standards, and must ensure that they are based on biologically-relevant models. This scientific literature must be independent of industry influence and any entity that has a financial interest in continued wireless deployment. It is of utmost importance that HHS and other public health agencies…

Read the full comment →

The European Commission has adopted a new standard requiring cellphones to be tested for radiation while touching the body — which is how people actually carry and use cellphones: in a pocket or against the skin. We should do the same. Additionally, the cell phones check for the closest cell tower every few seconds when the phone is on which radiates the body for hours a day. I see teenage girls carrying them in their back pocket resulting in colon cancer rates increasing in younger people. Instruct the cell phone companies to only check for the closest cell tower when a call is being made. https://saferemrtechnology.org.nz/2024/11/11/could-mobile-phone-radiation-be-contributing-to-colon-and-rectal-cancer/

You people will pay for it for doin this knowingly wrong thing to people it will be worse for you in the long run. Peace LIVE AND LET LIVE

Hello,I have done everything possible in my home to reduce the effects of EMF'S and Rw's...I sleep with a sliver lined beanie on my head and I wear a Shungite necklace, but all I've done is reduce the effects. Mental fog, ringing in the ears problems sleeping and soforth...The worst time is when they spray chemtrails for dsys making a canopy of poison causing respiratory problems and then they jack-up the 5G

Please, please do everything you possibly can do. They and now trying to push 6G...I live right next to Microsoft AI. And I can't even get them to plant trees to absorb this unseen danger. Thank you.

For me it started right after the 2016 election and I noticed it because I had Wi-Fi setup in my bedroom from AT&T and I started getting nose bleeds in my sleep and really bad headaches and then I started losing weight and having extreme high blood pressure unexplained and I went to the hospital and I went once I would go to the hospital I would be fine and they would say you're fine there's nothing wrong with you but then as soon as I went back to my house with the Wi-Fi it would start up again and so I got rid of it and then I was fine then I moved and I ended up having a roommate and they wanted Wi-Fi and I was like against it at first but then I said okay we'll get Verizon this time same thing happened within a week and a half I started having the symptoms losing weight rapidly blood felt like it was boiling I could feel my pulse in my body so I got rid of it and that was in 2018 and I have never went back to putting Wi-Fi in my house now I do have to deal with it at work and where I worked at and Station Square Pittsburgh for some reason I would feel it at work and I would I would have to walk away and go outside and get some fresh air and when I would look at the Wi-Fi is there were about 15 in the general vicinity right by me like because all the offices going and the restaurants and now that everybody's left because it's about to get torn down we're the only ones left and I don't feel anything there anymore. It's crazy that you guys put this out as a bulletin I thought it was fake news because I was actually going to contact Tulsi gabbard because my AI had told me you should because I felt like this was a maybe a direct energy weapon aimed at me which is crazy to even think of conspiracy theories and all that but you guys were talking about energy weapons and I was politically heavy against Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election so much as I think that I was being watched because of my Facebook posts on her page of all her wrongdoings and you know she came out later and said something about how she lost the election because of Alex Jones and his followers who put all kinds of crazy stuff out on her online which was nothing but the truth but that's I'm…

Read the full comment →

I have had very bad experience with EMF radiation over the years. For example, I walked into an office in the basement and I was feeling good, no headache, dizziness or migraine. After about one hour inside this basement office, I got a headache and I was feeling nauseated. I left the room feeling sick and went home. Unfortunately, when I get headaches, they turn into migraines that last four or five days and this was no exception. EMF radiation causes brain inflammation.

Humans and the technocrats who develop these technologies need to ask themselves one simple question: If 5G radiation for cell towers can penetrate the walls of a basement office, what does it do to the human body? The other question that they should ask is this: Do I care about human health or not? If the answer is "No" then they do not belong among human beings or use their destructive technologies on us and future human generations.

Why are you science-illiterate dimwits spending taxpayer resources on an extensive scientific investigation that's already been conducted by the WHO?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2025.109751

Of all the things that are actually of vital concern to Americans, this, given all of the other things that are in desperate need of scientific inquiry, is, to quote Lewis Black, one level beneath "are we eating too much garlic as a people?" You know what I want our tax resources spent on? HIV and AIDS. But what do you ignorant homophobes do? You canceled research funding for it, and now Australia is leading the world in AIDS research. I also want it spent on vaccines, and on the implementation of public health initiatives that target the social determinants of health, and mental health. These programs have a dramatic return on investment for the governments that implement them, and are the primary reason why all other developed nations have better health outcomes than the United States, at a fraction of the cost. How about researching the detrimental effects that toxic masculinity is having on the Department of Defense (only the most fragile of male egos would even consider naming it the "Department of War"), or what impact live-streaming a public execution will have on our society (you might want to crack a book by Foucault... I'll give you a hint, it doesn't go so well for those in power).

What would I know about this? I have a Master's of Science, a degree that nobody in leadership roles at the DHHS seems to hold. Ideally, I want Ph.D.s or M.D.s leading the DHHS, not a delusional, roadkill-eating conspiracy theorist who dodges the most basic questions about public health.

RFK Jr., You are failing the American people and the world. The United States should be the hub of scientific research, not the laughing stock of it. Nobody should be dying from the measles. You are responsible for these tragedies. Lack of funding in research has resulted in an exodus of scientists, who are being poached by other countries by exploiting your incompetence to entice them to move their labs to a country that will support and fund their research without having to jump through homophobic, racist, bigoted, and pseudoscientific hoops to do so. RESIGN IMMEDIATELY.

For years, since 2006, I have had dizziness, joint pain, skin burning, trouble sleeping, headaches, hormone imbalances, muscles aches, and heart palpitations. I never dreamed EMFs & RF could be causing all of my issues because I trusted Government Regulations. After researching how wireless devices (routers, phones, smart tv, computers) can have massive amount of radiation & EMFs flowing in your living space, therefore into you and through you.

Unfortunately, no one knows the amount of damage that has been done and how it has affected my family's quality of life. October 4, we lost our family pet. Emergency Vet diagnosis was heart failure. I live very close to a EMF Tower and I believe these frequencies and radiation killed him because pets are more sensitive.

"We The People" need our Government caring more about us, the people, humanity. We need air quality control, radiation & frequencies control. No Government should allow its people to suffer at their hands. May Almighty Holy God have mercy and judge us all.

Thanks You

From a Foundational Mitochondrial perspective.

NNemf dehydrates us on a cellular level.

Among so many more burdens.

We are Electric, Water beings of Light, we All must Understand to some degree. Go touch a tree and reconnect…

While We have introduced way too many burdens.

We can work to change and at least give some separation when we are sleeping, throughout our day and much more while still enjoying some technology.

We can work congruent with who and what we are rather and have Healthy awareness rather than the current ignorance or even fear state.

A quality Light environment, quality food, quality mindset and mineral status among many deeper Mitochondrial/Energy factors all play fundamental roles.

We shouldn't have to live near huge burdens especially if we are in a state of suffering.

Thank You for trying, Healthy awareness is Essential and we can live in Balance.

For starters please read the books The Body Electric by Robert O Becker and Going Somewhere by Andrew A. Marino. One will see that big tech and big money can suppress information regarding the "potential" detrimental effects of EMFs, RF, etc. on the human body. We need to understand that there is potential for bad effects and allow for personal preference when being exposed to these, as well as being informed about how much we are being exposed to, where and how. Even Russia keeps a lower rate of allowable exposure than the US and most people you would bring this issue up to would regard you as crazy for even mentioning it. We need to better inform as well as have studies performed that one of the parties does not benefit financially from the outcome. Please address this issue, it is huge for human health and wefare.

My Father Brian Lewis Connors Lived in a office business suite due to low income SSI this building had installed five g tower on the building above his office his lived for over 7 years. He had developed pain head ache health issue that when they opened him up for exploratory surgery to see what was going on he intestines had died , he had developed afib as well. This was Westminster California and he passed away at UCI medical center

These frequencies definitely affect me and family members. When we are in areas with less cell service such as west Texas, we do not feel this way. Something is not right.

As a concerned citizen, I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure.

I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence.

I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health.

Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.

Use real science. EMF radiation is not ionizing and does not damage living tissues

I think we are being exposed to so much that we don’t full understand the effects and won’t until it’s too late. I do not understand why we are changing things that have already worked to things I believe we don’t have enough information on. All of these fields through our bodies cannot be good for us.

Please remove all 5G,6G and any wireless towers. They are harmful to humans, wildlife and vegetation.

These cause harm and do not need to be by kids ball fields, neighborhoods or schools!!

I am submitting this comment as a consumer concerned about long-term exposure to wireless radiation from phones, Wi-Fi routers, cell towers, and other connected devices.

I urge HHS to conduct a thorough, independent review of whether current exposure limits adequately protect public health. This review needs to consider those most heavily exposed and should examine potential effects beyond tissue heating, including evidence concerning cancer, reproductive health, and children’s development.

Please prioritize research that reflects how people actually encounter wireless radiation: repeated exposure over many years, often from multiple sources and devices used close to the body. Assessments should consider signal strength, pulse patterns, duration, and combined exposure.

Please consider Melnick and Moskowitz’s 2026 analysis of animal data, which argues that existing exposure limits may inadequately protect against cancer and reproductive harm (https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-026-01288-6). I also ask HHS to evaluate Lai and Levitt’s review of exposure intensity, duration, and signal modulation (https://doi.org/10.1080/15368378.2022.2065683), and Scarato’s review of US regulatory gaps and proposed reforms (https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1677583). These papers warrant careful consideration alongside the broader evidence, including studies that have not found adverse effects.

I ask HHS to:

•Assess whether additional protections are needed for children, pregnant women, and other potentially vulnerable groups.

•Support long-term research with safeguards against industry conflicts of interest.

•Provide clear information about exposure and practical ways to reduce it, including wired alternatives in homes and schools.

•Recommend updated standards wherever the evidence shows that existing limits are insufficient.

Consumers should not have to navigate these questions alone. Please use this inquiry to advance transparent science, meaningful oversight, and public health protection.