7,080 public comments, newest first, 20 per page. Keep scrolling to load more.
I am attaching my statement and attachments as pdfs.
See attached file(s)
This is a correction to my submission Comment Tracking Number
mvi-zove-0r6f that contained the incorrect file for my statement
See comment attached.
*See Attached Testimonial From Another Innocent Individual Injured By Wireless RF Radiation
Kevin Mottus, Outreach Director
CA Brain Tumor Assn
Email: wirelessbiologicaleffects@gmail.com
See attached file
See comment attached.
*See Attached Testimonial From Another Innocent Individual Injured By Wireless RF Radiation
Kevin Mottus, Outreach Director
CA Brain Tumor Assn
Email: wirelessbiologicaleffects@gmail.com
See comment attached.
*See Attached Testimonial From Another Innocent Individual Injured By Wireless RF Radiation
Kevin Mottus, Outreach Director
CA Brain Tumor Assn
Email: wirelessbiologicaleffects@gmail.com
See comment attached.
*See Attached Testimonial From Another Innocent Individual Injured By Wireless RF Radiation
Kevin Mottus, Outreach Director
CA Brain Tumor Assn
Email: wirelessbiologicaleffects@gmail.com
See comment attached.
*See Attached Testimonial From Another Innocent Individual Injured By Wireless RF Radiation
Kevin Mottus, Outreach Director
CA Brain Tumor Assn
Email: wirelessbiologicaleffects@gmail.com
Please see attached files for comments, science, and policy needs regarding wireless harms from a cell tower located in Pittsfield Massachusetts and the human suffering it caused, as well as proposed solutions to prevent communities from being harmed by wireless facilities being sited too close to homes and schools. With so much gratitude, Courtney
Outlines a proposed discussion of EMF sensitivity, exposure standards, research and recovery approaches. Argues that assessment should focus on biological responses over time, emphasizes distance from sources and expresses concern about cumulative wireless exposure.
What are the highest-priority research gaps regarding EMF and RF exposure?
Five Common Precursors to EMF Sensitivity
Measuring EMF exposure in the environment is not the same as measuring how living tissue responds to it over time.
Table of Contents of Enclosed Document "FCC / HHS Public Comment Anonymous" ======================================================== 1. My Perspective About some of my EMF sources, types, and durations of exposure My health experience Dental imaging and related health problems Evaluation and treatment sought Healthcare professionals’ clinical observations ======================================================== 2. Exposure Standards and Risk Assessment What technical changes would improve assessment, disclosure and mitigation? Measuring EMF exposure in the environment is not the same as measuring how living tissue responds to it over time. About spectrum analysis and proposed safety standards ======================================================== 3. Current and Proposed Research What are the highest-priority research gaps regarding EMF and RF exposure? Study imperative: RF, blood proteins, and blood–brain barrier findings ======================================================== 4. An Evaluation of a Personal Medical Experience Five Common Precursors to EMF Sensitivity 1. Physical Trauma to the Central Nervous System (CNS) 2. Exposure to Chemical Toxins 3. Exposure to Biological Toxins 4. Acute or Chronic Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields 5. An Impaired Immune System Six Actions to Promote Recovery 1. Reduce Exposure to Irritants 2. Rebalance Limbic System 3. Immune Support 4. Detoxification 5. DNA Testing 6. Dental Aspects Flawed Safety Guidelines and the WHO Report (Let's not have a repeat performance please.) ======================================================== CONCLUDING REMARKS FROM ENCLOSED PATIENT EXPERIENCE AND SUGGESTED RESEARCH As I said earlier, scientists characterizing the frequency as they do makes the issue so complicated: operating frequency, power density, specific absorption rate (SAR), electric- and magnetic-field strength, modulation and pulse characteristics, duty cycle, beam-forming, simultaneous exposure to multiple frequencies, duration of exposure, distance from the source, proximity to the body, and cumulative exposure. I’m more interested in biology and the living response, rather than chasing the endless wave. The truth is,…
Reports painful pulsed attacks beginning in 2012, followed by dizziness, confusion, communication difficulties and other medical problems. Describes ongoing cancer evaluation, limited wireless use and personal EMF/RF measurements.
Received attacks several times during the 1st year.
Left me dizzy and confused
Left side of my body has had Cancer, shrunken left Kidney, left back pain, possible left ear Cancer.
This is Mary Williams.
Started in 2012. Pain to ears. Felt like pulses and it was very painful. Received attacks several times during the 1st year. Unable to function. Left me dizzy and confused, short of breath and am unable to remember words, and communication for the 1st 2 days after attack. Unexplainable major heat to body. During the 1st year attacks were aimed at my Left ear.
Have been going to Doctor since 2012. Left side of my body has had Cancer, shrunken left Kidney, left back pain, possible left ear Cancer. (waiting on results). Headaches.
Experience static in head from time to time. I do not use Wifi, do not use cell phone much. Just started using cell phone this year.
Genetic testing, shows cancer not tied to heredity. Triple negative Test Results for any hormone. I am going thru many, many test and not finished yet.
Have EMF/RF reader(very accurate) Ranging from lowest to highest Ghz. Well over the norm. Recorded Results in EMF/RF reader .
See attached file(s)
Reports fatigue, dizziness and disorientation associated with smartphones and connected vehicles, with perceived improvement after changing phone and car. Requests clearer information to help choose lower-EMF products for personal and family health.
can make me feel tired, dizzy, disoriented.
I definitely would like to know more about how to choose low EMF products
I am 70 years old. Cell phones have not always been part of my life, obviously. I have noticed that smart phones and my smart connected car (Subaru Forrester 2019) and other cars with smart features can make me feel tired, dizzy, disoriented. Recently (in the last 6 months) I switched to a phone that is considered "dumb" without all the data features. I cannot get group texts or pictures. My health has improved. I don't get "zapped" anymore. I got rid of the 2019 Subaru with Eye Drive and all the smart features. I have much more energy. My brain works better without all that interference. I also have a Blushield product in my home that counteracts the EMFs. I definitely would like to know more about how to choose low EMF products because I want to be healthy and I want my family to be healthy. It was not easy to find the best phone and car for myself.
Reports tinnitus, headaches and other observations, including alleged digging, directed light phenomena and elevated EMF readings near vehicles. Requests independent investigation, review of exposure standards and greater transparency about residential emissions.
persistent ringing in my ears, headaches, sinus-like symptoms
unusual light phenomena directed toward my property and person
support independent research
review existing exposure standards, increase transparency regarding electromagnetic emissions in residential areas
I am submitting this comment to share concerns about potential EMF, RF, and wireless radiation exposure in Clinton, Maryland.
Since approximately 2020, I have experienced persistent ringing in my ears, headaches, sinus-like symptoms, and unusual floor vibrations from unauthorized digging beneath my property that were not present previously. I have also documented what appear to be blue light rays and other unusual light phenomena directed toward my property and person, including video recordings captured at night.
In addition, I have observed elevated EMF readings around certain nearby vehicles that remain stationary for extended periods. These observations have raised concerns about possible exposure from Wi-Fi systems, radio frequency transmissions, wireless infrastructure, and other electromagnetic sources.
While I recognize that more research is needed, my experiences lead me to believe that potential health effects from long-term EMF and RF exposure deserve further scientific investigation. I encourage federal agencies to support independent research, review existing exposure standards, increase transparency regarding electromagnetic emissions in residential areas, and take public concerns seriously.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide this input.
Concerned American
Clinton, Maryland
See attached file.
Criticizes FCC exposure limits and close residential tower siting. Describes approval of a tower beside family property despite an existing nearby tower, challenges the submitted coverage justification and local decision-making, and requests stronger telecommunications accountability.
the FCC has abdicated its duty to enact truly protective RF exposure limits.
approved a 195-foot-tall cell tower adjacent to my beautiful property
prioritize research into the biological effects of wireless radiation
First, I want to thank HHS for soliciting information from the public about EMF and wireless radiation-related health and environmental issues. The federal government has failed to adequately protect the public from ever-increasing exposures to EMFs for decades, and the FCC has abdicated its duty to enact truly protective RF exposure limits. The fact that HHS is taking steps to prioritize research into the biological effects of wireless radiation, and EMFs more broadly, is a meaningful step toward addressing long overdue gaps between science and public health policy in this area. Despite thousands of peer-reviewed, published scientific studies indicating biological harm from wireless radiation exposure, even at levels below FCC exposure limits, today’s wireless environment is governed by 30-year-old exposure limits that only address short-term, thermal impacts of exposure. Meanwhile, children are literally sleeping with cell phones under their pillows at night, men are carrying cell phones in their pants pocket all day long, and massive, industrial cell towers with dozens of wireless antennas on them are installed and operational mere feet away from peoples’ homes. And have you seen the wireless antenna arrays installed atop apartment buildings in New York City? Huge antennas mere feet away from peoples’ bedroom windows! That’s insanity! (I have attached some photos of particularly egregious installations to this comment for the agency’s review.) On a more personal note, sadly, two weeks ago, my Planning Commission (the Jefferson County Planning Commission in Jefferson County, FL), approved a 195-foot-tall cell tower adjacent to my beautiful property that has been in the family for decades. The property is also located in a majority minority community near historic Baptist and Methodist rural churches. Meanwhile, a 302-foot-tall cell tower is already installed and operational just 0.82 miles from the installation site! To assert its bogus “needs” case, Verizon provided the Jefferson County Planning Commission with anonymously produced RF coverage maps. Nowhere in Verizon’s submission is there reference to the type of RF propagation model used to generate its…
I have attached a brief comment regarding the biological harms and need for further study on man-made RF/EMF and am grateful for the opportunity to speak.
Describes a coworker’s seizures near power infrastructure and improvement after changing jobs, plus personal and spousal brain fog and insomnia after a neighborhood tower installation. Requests independent research on wireless devices, household exposure and LED lighting.
a power pole with multiple large lines going into it
Both my husband and I have been experiencing extreme brain fog and forgetfulness and insomnia
a 5G tower was put up near our neighborhood.
Studies need to be done by independent health-minded agencies or non-profits.
In-home wi-fi and wi-fi appliances
Am grateful to hear that EMF exposure will be seriously researched.
I have a co-worker that worked in my office for 10 years - approx 10 feet away from her desk window is a power pole with multiple large lines going into it - not an average power pole. She began having mini seizures and was diagnosed with a rare, one of a kind type of epilepsy and was asked to be a study. Within 6 months, she moved to another job and all of her symptoms went away.
In the past year, a 5G tower was put up near our neighborhood. Both my husband and I have been experiencing extreme brain fog and forgetfulness and insomnia to an uncomfortable extreme. We have been otherwise healthy.
Makes me wonder about the utility box that is mounted just outside of our bedroom wall.
In-home wi-fi and wi-fi appliances - are there any studies on the effects of short and long-term exposure?
LED light bulbs - everywhere, since incandescent have been outlawed. I have seen reports that they have a blinking pattern similar to fluorescent lights. Are there studies on this?
Studies need to be done by independent health-minded agencies or non-profits.
Thank you for the opportunity give input.
Advocates residential setbacks of at least 300 meters for smaller base stations and typically half a mile or more for larger facilities. Supplies a list of attached research documents offered in support of those siting proposals.
a relatively low-height "small cell" base station (such as those on lamp posts) should be no closer than 300 meters to a residence.
a large "macro cell" facility typically should be half a mile or more from any home.
Thank you for the opportunity to submit information regarding biological effects and potential health hazards of low-level, long-term exposure to radiofrequency radiation (RFR).
I am uploading here several recent, well-written RFR-related scientific documents. Each one is relevant to the ongoing campaign by many doctors and scientists worldwide to restrict mobile phone base stations (cell towers) to locations at least 300 meters away from residential homes.
Currently, in most countries, telecommunications providers are allowed to site base stations almost wherever they want. Yet much scientific evidence now supports the idea that a relatively low-height "small cell" base station (such as those on lamp posts) should be no closer than 300 meters to a residence. The same body of evidence suggests that a large "macro cell" facility typically should be half a mile or more from any home.
Upload #1: Akkam 2020 MWR blood ROS.pdf
Upload #2: Cell carrier frequencies.pdf
Upload #3: Hardell 2022 EHS nr base stns.pdf
Upload #4: McCredden 2026 EMF sensitivity survey.pdf
Upload #5: Nilsson 2023 5G cases two men.pdf
Upload #6: Nilsson 2023 MPBS 5G caused EMR-S.pdf
Upload #7: Nilsson 2025 RFR memory probs children.pdf
Loading more comments…