7,080 public comments, newest first, 20 per page. Keep scrolling to load more.
The commenter reports that healthcare providers have identified family health problems as possibly related to EMF exposure.
possibly related to EMF radiation
Our family has health issues which have been identified by various health care providers as possibly related to EMF radiation.
The commenter reports a diagnosis of EMF sensitivity, rapid headaches, tinnitus and fatigue after exposure, and increasing recovery times. They describe staying home to avoid devices, tolerating wired computing, and trying supplements and other mitigation.
officially diagnosed EMF-sensitive
Tinnitus, headaches, chronic fatigue
in other words to stay at home
Working on a wired computer.
1. & 2. I am responding as: 3a. Type of wireless or RF/EMF sources involved (e.g., mobile phones, Wi-Fi, smart meters…)All wireless devices, especially Wi-Fi 3b. Nature, duration, frequency, and approximate timing (e.g., years):over 15 years 3c. Adverse health effect(s) experienced:Tinnitus, headaches, chronic fatigue, and occasional dizziness. 3d. Time from first exposure to first appearance of adverse health effects; and did a change in exposure coincide with the onset of adverse effects:Symptoms manifest almost immediately. The duration of these health effects has been increasing with time - it can take as long as 24 hours for them to fade away after exposure. 3e. Was medical evaluation or treatment sought? (Optionally:) Was there a diagnosis?I was officially diagnosed EMF-sensitive about 5 years ago by Pr. Dominique Belpomme in Paris. 3f. Were steps taken to reduce or eliminate exposure, and were there subsequent changes in the effects?I have scheduled mercury-fillings removal shortly. Various dietary supplements have become part of my daily routine. Some seem to improve my condition a bit. However, it really seems the only cure is to STAY AWAY FROM ALL WIRELESS DEVICES, in other words to stay at home. 3g. Any supporting documentation? This includes Scientific Reports, exposure measurements, or other relevant information:When I was first diagnosed, my histamine level appeared to be especially high. Additional Details you would like to share about your experiences of adverse health effects you believe to be associated with exposure to wireless radiation or EMF's:Concentration problems definitely seem to be another adverse health effect. This is something I do not normally suffer from - I am a pretty focused person. B1a. Sources you experience as causing you Adverse Effects:Mobile phones, connected watches and car keys, chordless landline phones, Wi-Fi, smart meters... B1b. Sources you can sense, but don't seem to harm you: B1c. Sources you can use without sensing or being harmed:Working on a wired computer. B1d. Sources that seem to provide benefit (i.e., electrotherapy):Nature B2a. Health conditions you think may contribute to your sensitivity to EMFs…
The commenter reports burning and disabling hand and arm sensations while holding a phone and describes limiting handling and router proximity. They request an HHS evidence report, consideration of affected people’s experiences, and protective federal standards.
burning and debilitating sensations in my hand and arm
wireless router
create a comprehensive report
actual protective standards
I am submitting this comment as someone concerned about the health effects of wireless radiation as well as the effects on the environment.
I have been personally affected by wireless radiation, in the form of burning and debilitating sensations in my hand and arm from holding my cell phone. I have had to limit handling a cell phone, and keep it on a holder or stand or away from my person as often as possible. I also stay as far away from our wireless router as I can in our home.
I hope that HHS will use this opportunity to create a comprehensive report on the current medical, biological, and public health knowledge regarding these effects and take action on that. Please consider the experiences of those affected by this radiation as part of what is reviewed to come up with what should be the scientific underpinnings to actual protective standards and action by the federal government.
The commenter asserts that wireless towers harm living things and calls for their removal.
equipment towers are dangerous
dangerous to all living things
Call them what you wish, 5G, 6G etc.. EMF, RF wireless equipment towers are dangerous to all living things. The radiation they disburse is destroying all life and they should all be removed.
The commenter hopes their contribution will improve protection from wireless devices worldwide.
improve woldwide protection against all wireless devices
I do hope my contribution will help improve woldwide protection against all wireless devices.
A health consultant reports increasing sensitivity, headaches, tinnitus, cardiac symptoms, and emergency visits associated with wireless exposure. They describe difficulty working and using a porch, expensive mitigation efforts, and opposition to further frequency increases and 6G.
more and more sensitive to this unrelenting energy
heart palpitations, heart pain
Tinnitus, constant headaches
extremely difficult running a business
installed a 5G tower
Thank you for this opportunity to share how horrendous this technology has been for my well-being and health – and everyone else I have talked to that suffer from this. (I am a health consultant) Gradually over the years, and ESPECIALLY after the lockdowns in 2020, I have become more and more sensitive to this unrelenting energy coming through our bodies. Specifics: Tinnitus, constant headaches, CONSTANTLY feeling shaky and as though I am plugged into an electric socket – unless I go out and ground in Nature, and then I can feel a little relief; heart palpitations, heart pain, exhaustion. Having spent several decades in office type environments or running my own business with the required computers, printers, cell phones etc., I need to now limit my time to only one hour here and there, so it makes it extremely difficult running a business. Proven specifics: 1) I had to spend 5 days down in Virginia Beach at a conference end of May 2026 and felt very frazzled most of the time down there. Four days after my return, I ended up in ER with my blood pressure being around 210/115, with heart pain and palpitations, when I had never ever had any heart issues and all prior tests had shown I had a strong heart. The same thing repeated itself a week later, by waking up in the middle of the night 2:30am, with more intense symptoms requiring a rescue squad trip to the ER again. For the past 6 years, every time I drive to Virginia Beach for business reason, the intensity of all the 5G towers and surveillance cameras on every lamp post, etc., has given me chest pains, palpitations and feeling very fragile. 2) We have a lovely sunny porch look-out onto a park. The RF (measured with a TriField meter) used to be around 00019 -.014 mW/m2 outside, and now around that amount inside our home - .014 - .018 (this being BEHIND the metal mesh screens). But now outside on the porch – as they installed a 5G tower visible at a high level across the park about a mile away – the level fluctuates between 7.8 – 11.5 mW/m2 so now makes it totally impossible to sit outside on the porch ever without feeling zapped. I could give many other examples, but these two stand out. The ONLY way I can now…
The commenter supports transparent independent HHS research and a moratorium on exposure expansion, while reporting no personal or known contacts’ health effects. They criticize FCC oversight, Section 704, and restrictions on local siting authority, and raise cumulative and environmental concerns.
transparent so that independent, non-conflict of interest scientists can replicate
Section 704
moratorium on any expansion
environment (animals, plants, etc)
I very much support HHS's involvement in studying (including reviewing published independent non-conflict of interest studies) the effects of electromagnetic fields (EMF), radiofrequency (RF) radiation, and wireless radiation on human health (particularly children and other vulnerable groups, such as pregnant women) and the environment (animals, plants, etc), given that it has the expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health that the FCC does not. These studies should also include long-term consequences and cumulative exposure, and should not include any conflict of interest industry input. Also, I believe that whatever studies the HHS does, should be transparent so that independent, non-conflict of interest scientists can replicate them. And once HHS has completed their studies, analysis, etc., the necessary protections to public health and the environment should be implemented. Herein, I will refer to the 3 areas the HHS will be studying as electromagnetic radiation, although I am aware that the more correct phrase would be non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation. I am responding from the perspective of a concerned member of the public. The FCC has been negligent in this area – 1) touting its 1996 guidelines used to determine the safety limits of exposure to electromagnetic radiation, even though there have been massive increases in the levels of electromagnetic radiation since then, due to advances in the technology; 2) relying on studies done in the 1980's (on animals) which focused only on the thermal factors affecting health, and not on the effects on cells, DNA, and possibly other factors, that could affect human and animal health; 3) ignoring for 5 years, a court order to update their 1996 guidelines to the current date; 4) ignoring the voluminous independent, non-conflict of interest studies that clearly show a DNA, etc. harm to human health and the environment. Based on just these 4 listings of negligence, it is clear to me that the FCC is more concerned about the interests of the industry than the health of the public and the environment, and therefore we need the HHS to take the lead on this. I do not have a story of the health…
The commenter requests independent research on 5G and nearby small cells, criticizing thermal-only standards and highlighting children, pregnancy, older people, and wildlife. They cite linked research and call for HHS action protecting public and ecosystem health.
significant need for more research
close-proximity small cells
children, babies, pregnant women, or the elderly
bee populations, birds, other wildlife
outdated risk assessments
October 21, 2026 HHS Request for Information on EMF and wireless radiation: Docket Number: HHS-OASH-2026-0397 Studies specifically on the higher frequencies used by 5G and close-proximity small cells are totally lacking, indicating the significant need for more research. Some reports point to concerning trends about the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) relying on outdated standards and brushing off evidence of potential harm. No one knows how this will affect bee populations, birds, other wildlife besides the close proximity to living areas for humans, expecially children, babies, pregnant women, or the elderly. In some cases these 5G small cells have been placed right outside someone's house near bedrooms The FCC is a compromised agency ignoring the science that already has shown harm from close proximity to non-ionizing radiation exposures. My comments are based on peer reviewed research. Question 11: “Should exposure assessment or risk evaluation differ for sensitive populations such as those noted below? Please explain.” ANSWER: Yes it should be evaluated totally differently due to the higher risk to children and pregnant women that can be as high as 10x more of a risk factor than that to a 25 year old male risk factor. Also many of these exposure limits are determined by a plastic mannikin head for thermal effects only. These are all totally outdated risk assessments. (References applicable to this statement found here: “Research on Children’s Vulnerability to Cell Phone Radio-frequency Radiation” https://ehtrust.org/research-on-childrens-vulnerability-to-cell-phone-radio-frequency-radiation/ ). Question 12 and 13: ANSWER - For more on scientific studies these weblinks below hereby incorporated by reference at 1. and 2. and 3. that includes numerous citations: 1. “5G Wireless Technology: Cutting Through the Hype” https://www.saferemr.com/2017/11/5g-wireless-technology-cutting-through.html ). 2. Low-level EMF effects on wildlife and plants: “What research tells us about an ecosystem approach” https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9732734/ B Blake Levitt 1,*, Henry C Lai 2,*, Albert M Manville II 3,* Abstract “There is enough evidence to indicate…
The commenter opposes a tower near a rural community of people with electromagnetic hypersensitivity and requests changes to federal law and FCC authority so local health concerns can guide siting.
Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity
Telecommunications Act of 1996
fighting a cell tower
built their homes specifically to protect them
The fact that the Telecommunications Act of 1996 doesn't allow health concerns when local governments deny permits for cell towers is absolutely concerning! AND the fact that the safety limits haven't been updated since 1996 is absurd! I live in a neighborhood near a community of people that have Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity and I have been fighting a cell tower with them that will drastically affect their health and learning about how cell towers effect health in the process is very disturbing. They moved to this rural area away from cell towers and built their homes specifically to protect them for EMFs and RFs and now they are about to turn on the new tower so close to their community. The FCC has too much power over the will of the people and this has got to end! This illness and the effects of EMFs and RFs cannot be ignored, the law needs to change NOW in favor of We The People, not big corporations!
Safe Tech International requests broader examination of technology’s health and environmental impacts, expanded wired infrastructure, independent public education, and study of cumulative exposures. It questions current measurement capabilities and discusses privacy and technology-related ecological concerns.
effects of technology and AI are far broader
a robust fiber or wired infrastructure
e-waste, conflict minerals, energy consumption
surveillance/privacy
Safe Tech International is a not-for-profit organization advocating for safe technology. A 34-page report issued in 1976 by the Defense Intelligence Agency titled "Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Radiation (Radiowaves and Microwaves) – Eurasian Communist Countries, analyzed a number of Soviet and Eastern block research studies that demonstrated a wide range of adverse biological effects from exposure to radio frequency and microwave radiation. In its summary, the report issued a “Smoking Gun” warning: “If the more advanced nations of the West are strict in the enforcement of stringent exposure standards, there could be unfavorable effects on industrial output and military functions." The rest is history – The US chose technological/industrial expansion and military might over the health and well-being of humans, wildlife, and perhaps even Earth herself. The time is long overdue to mend our ways. So we are particularly grateful to HHS for opening this conversation. Before responding to your questions, we offer two suggestions to consider: 1. The effects of technology and AI are far broader than just the health impacts of RF/EMFs. Other areas include psycho-social effects, screen-time addiction, e-waste, conflict minerals, energy consumption, data centers, cyber security, pollution of the skies, surveillance/privacy, info/cyber & EMS warfare, and perhaps our very humanity itself…what it means to be alive. HHS may wish to look into how any or all of these impact health and/or the environment. 2. The need to solicit input on the health of RF/EMFs begs the question as to why in the US we have so much wireless technology polluting our airwaves when a robust fiber or wired infrastructure would be far safer for both humans and wildlife. Currently, the US ranks 32nd out of 38 OECD countries for fiber-to-the-home. With a more robust wired infrastructure, we would be far less reliant on wireless, and less saturated with chaotic RF fields in our environments. Moreover, fiber is safer, faster, more reliable, resilient, cyber secure, energy efficient, and lasts for decades. Along with it, we would need honest public education on the benefits of wired and the harms of…
The commenter attributes daily cardiovascular, respiratory, and cognitive distress to a faulty utility capacitor-bank controller and reports measured field changes, displacement from home, and resolution after shutdown. They state that utility engineers confirmed the equipment problem.
localized power distribution capacitor bank
acute, localized cardiovascular pressure
severe, temporary loss of cognitive function
I was displaced from my home for over a month
HHS RFI Response: Public Experiences and Reported Potential Adverse Health Effects (Question 3) Respondent Perspective: Individual Consumer and Affected Patient. Response to Question 3: a. Type(s) of Wireless Technology / RF/EMF Source Involved: The source was a malfunctioning utility-grade infrastructure component, specifically a defective Radio Frequency (RF) Capacitor controller within a localized power distribution capacitor bank operated by regional provider DTE Energy. b. Nature, Duration, Frequency, and Approximate Timing of Exposure: The exposure occurred daily like clockwork, initiating with an intense, localized peak surge at approximately 7:00 AM every morning. This daily cyclic exposure persisted for over a consecutive month, beginning shortly prior to October 18, 2024, and continuing until temporary structural decommissioning on November 23, 2024. When the seasonal daylight-saving time change occurred, the environmental behavior shifted in a manner that was helpful to show the same shift with the mG timeline and plotting. This shift provided critical diagnostic evidence that allowed the utility company to definitively isolate the source. c. Potential Adverse Health Effects Experienced: Upon the immediate onset of the daily utility cycle, I experienced severe physical distress consisting of acute, localized cardiovascular pressure, respiratory inhibition (“feeling of lung implosion”), near-syncope (extreme dizziness and blacking out), and a severe, temporary loss of cognitive function consistent with cerebral oxygen deprivation. d. Onset and Coincidence of Symptoms Relative to Exposure: The physiological symptoms perfectly mirrored environmental readings. Independent monitoring using calibrated equipment verified that acute cardiovascular and respiratory distress coincided exactly with real-time milligauss (mG) spikes in the local magnetic flux density. e. Medical Evaluation and Treatment Sought: Due to the immediate, life-threatening severity of the daily cardiac and respiratory insults, immediate evacuation from the localized zone was required to avoid total syncopal episodes. Because full physiological recovery occurred only upon leaving the…
A Finnish commenter describes EMF sensitivity with headaches, nausea, cognitive difficulty, and palpitations around phones, towers, and Wi-Fi, especially during travel. They reduce home exposure and request stronger limits addressing effects beyond heating.
my EMF sensitivity
really severe fatigue, nausea and headaches
heart palpitations
public spaces with Wifi or WLAN
the heating effect is not the only one
Hello from Finland! I'm writing about my own experience of reacting to wireless devices and networks. When 4G was launched in Finland, "a net stick" was installed on my laptop, through which I could access the internet. At the same time, I bought an iPhone. My face was always red and hot after using Internet via laptop and after a few months my left hand and my right hand index finger started to hurt and tingle after using the iPhone as well. Then, the operator offered a tablett that has internet connection and would also work as a server for my laptop. That tablett screen was so electrical, that it stack in my fingers almost like there was some kind of glue on it. I discussed many times with the operator about this strange fenomen, but nobody knew, what was the problem. Well, after receiving my EMF meter, the picture got crystal clear! I haven't used that tablett since. At that time I went on business trips to different cities in Finland and at the same time there could be up to 5 mobile phones in the car, several of which were in use at the same time. On such trips, I suffered from really severe fatigue, nausea and headaches, and the confused feeling could continue even days after such a trip. I connected the nausea to the mobile phone being on, as I once turned on the phone in the car and immediately a wave of nausea attacked me. The difference between the real car sickness and EMF sickness is clear; car sickness makes you vomit, EMF sickness gets better, once you exit the vehicle and the metal box filled with EMFR and you don't vomit. The feeling however starts in the back of your scull for both conditions. Later on, I even unknowingly tested the effect of the phone and noticed that, for example the arrival of a text message while driving causes a rapid, stabbing headache, and the ringing of the phone causes nausea and a dizzy sensation in the head even before the phone makes a sound. One time, my friend had, according to my wish, switched off mobile data, but she got a normal call during the drive and she just turned the voice down, but let the phone ring for a long time, because she didn't understand, that I really suffer because of it. I was about to…
The commenter urges protection of children and other living things, recounts advocacy for Oregon school-wireless legislation, and cites reported illness among pupils and teachers. They criticize the handling of a state science review and commercial influence.
children in schools
high power wi-fi routers
passage, in Oregon, of SB283
review science to determine whether children in schools are safe
plants, animals and humans
Thank you for reading this. Please do what is right for our children and our children’s children. You’ll find cell phone radiation is very similar to tobacco. Cell phones are very addictive and have a significant, detrimental health effects and sadly the impact won’t be discovered until years after extraordinary damage has already been done. Please step up and do what is right for the health and wellbeing of humanity and frankly all life on the planet. For the radiation is harmful to all living beings (plants, animals and humans). Many have died do to the effects of cellphone radiation. Many others suffer daily. Many are completely unaware of the dangers and the long term harm being created.Please, Please, please protect the public rather than corporate profits. In 2019 a colleague of mine facilitated the passage, in Oregon, of SB283 which was to review science to determine whether children in schools are safe being exposed to high power wi-fi routers and other wireless devices in the classroom. The bill passed unanimously in the Senate and overwhelmingly in the House. While lobbying the bill and gathering information he interviewed 2 children who had to leave school due to microwave sickness caused by RF in the school. He also met 2 teachers, one in Los Angeles with the same condition. The teacher in L.A. sued the school and won the lawsuit. The results of the science review by the Oregon Health Authority, quoting the first draft: "All studies showed worse health outcomes, all studies showed harm to reproductive organs..." The draft was withheld from a FOIA request and later obtained by journalist, Dan Forbes, who wrote a lengthy article about the corrupt handling and the crime committed by OHA in withholding from a FOIA request. In addition, commercial insurance companies will no longer insure for "harm from exposure to electromagnetic frequencies" This is an industry wide practice that has taken affect years ago. Cell telephone advertising shows people with the phone against their heads yet companies warn to keep the phone an inch from the body. I always wonder if legislators or others in high profile agencies and organizations that are compromised by…
The commenter describes household field measurements without known attributable health effects and proposes blinded sensitivity testing, cumulative real-world exposure research, and phased deployment with control groups. They discuss limits of existing monitoring and ask for improved disclosure.
properly controlled, double-blind or blinded field protocol
planned, phased in implementation
standard wiring by light switches
including a young child
Docket: HHS-OASH-2026-0397 Perspective (Question 2): Individual consumer and homeowner who has measured ambient fields with a consumer multi-field meter (GQ EMF-390) and is concerned about cumulative exposure for my family, including a young child. Exposures (Question 3): I live in a typical household with a growing number of devices transmitting EMF. WiFi and bluetooth on multiple devices, smart meters, and wireless infrastructure. Observed Exposure Patterns (Question 4k): Observed exposure patterns: I got a sensor to review my family's exposure. A surprising finding was that just standard wiring by light switches would give high readings. As a small test i held the sensor up to my phone while streaming a video, our running microwave, and both the phone and microwave at once. The phone and microwave together showed higher readings than the devices by themselves. Holding the sensor higher resulted in higher readings. Taking the sensor outside was notably less exposure. Another surprise to me was that at my work in an office the signal generally was less than at home. My family is concerned but does not have any noticeable health impacts that can directly be attributed to exposures that I know of. Future Research Recommendations (Questions 4m, 5o): Existing studies seem to focus on controlled lab environments mostly over short term exposures. Future studies should look at cumulative real world situations. Cumulative meaning interactions of different sources of exposure and exposure over time. One example experiment is proposed. A straightforward way to test the claim of direct sensing is a properly controlled, double-blind or blinded field protocol: participants who self-identify as sensitive are transported or positioned near verified high- and low-exposure locations (cell sites, base stations, or controlled sources) without visual or other cues, with actual field levels measured independently. Demographic diversity (age, sex, race/ethnicity) would strengthen generalizability. FCC guidance accounts for multiple transmitters inside one product and for multiple fixed sources with known spatial relationships when evaluating site compliance, but does not fully…
The commenter requests tower-siting exposure limits and alleges high radar readings associated with Homeland Security surveillance, with effects on people, plants, and animals.
Set regulations
when the cell.tower is sited
Homeland security does surveillance
people plants and animals
Set regulations for .05 microwaves per cm squared when the cell.tower is sited. Homeland security does surveillance by synthetic aperture radar camera readings as high as 300mw/cm2.The readings are higher near the tower and the beam spreads out as it encountered moisture in the atmosphere effecting thousands of people plants and animals. Have thousands of extreme readings logged!
The commenter describes a wife’s electrical sensitivity, painful cramping after nearby phone calls, associated insomnia, and difficulty visiting town or being around people.
Electrically Sensitive person
The pain leads to insomnia
a challenge for her to go to town and be around people
I am commenting mostly from The perspective of husband to an Electrically Sensitive person as well as an experince I had.
My wife has severe muscle cramping that gradually increases in intensity and pain after even a few moments of exposure to cell phone singals. Particularly, when a call is actively being used.
Her reactions occar when an active call is within 35 feet of her but shorter distances increase the effect. This has been confirmed to me when I have simply walked by the house passing at closest, 10 feet from her. She being inside the house and having no knowledge that I was on a call, nor passing near her. Those evenings later she would be in pain and not understand why. I knew the reason because I had not respected the rule of maintaining my distance with my phone. The pain leads to insomnia for her and the insomnia leads to further severe pain. She is unable to function nor enjoy life until this cycle can be broken. Muscle relaxers have broken this cycle and prevented it but it's a challenge for her to go to town and be around people since cell phone use became widespread in the last decade.
I wanted to briefly share our experience and I hope it is helpful to you.
Thank-You
The commenter reports better sleep after an unannounced meter replacement and describes sensitivity to Wi-Fi and hospital equipment that prevented an overnight stay with a parent. They object to replacement fees and seek access to older technology.
my smart meter switched back
I am what I think is called a sensitive
I started sleeping better
I was unable to stay with my father that night
WiFi has to be off in my house
EMF is horrible. I am one of those people who HAD TO have my smart meter switched back and we all know that it was only switched back to a digital meter. I have an interesting share! I had ordered my smart meter removed/exchanged for an analog (digital is what ya get) and they gave me a date they would be installing it. About a week before that time, they called and let me know they had to move my date 6+ months later. I took a picture of the meter because I wanted to be sure I received a new one. Anyway, not in 6 months, more like 2, I started sleeping better. I even told my husband that I was sleeping so much better that it was like the smart meter had been taken away. Then I thought to go outside and look and sure enough they had changed it out. We must not have been home and the picture I took proved it. IT HAD been switched. Of course the fee also followed right after that for the exchange. Charged for something I never wanted switched in the first place. WiFi has to be off in my house when I sleep or am sick. I am what I think is called a sensitive and I literally can feel the vibration running through me. It is worst at night when I settle down to try and sleep. No C19 shot, I think I may have had covid briefly- just saying. The feeling is unsettling. When I go camping, I sleep like a baby. I am over 50. If this gets any worse, I will have to move further away from things. I believe my husband is affected and does not realize it. One other time, I was in the hospital with my father. He was in one of the rooms they put you in when you enter through emergency. So the room had a door to enter and a door to the side hall. I had planned to stay all night with him but my body was charged worse than ever. I felt like I was going to come unhinged. Literally made me sick. Finally, one of the times that I got up and was snooping around, I opened the side door to find that it was the side hall and they used it to put a bunch of machines to charge. Ones they roll around room to room to do tests. I was unable to stay with my father that night. Not sure how people are working in that atmosphere. Please Please,Please, find a way for the old technology to return. TV…
The commenter associates a ten-year-old granddaughter’s illness and agitation after school with computer and Wi-Fi exposure, and requests research and authoritative guidance for schools.
My Grand Daughter, at 10 years of age
wi-fi exposure all day long
We need more "gold standard science"
I am so happy that the public is finally being asked to participate in important health concerns. My Grand Daughter, at 10 years of age is now taking typing lessons at school on a computer. They have wi-fi exposure all day long and are on the computers a good part of that day. She comes home just bouncing off the walls, or sick! The school will not hear the parents about the dangers! They seem to need someone of "authority" to tell them that their decisions to go digital in all ways, are not benefiting the kids! I believe it is having the opposite affect! We need more "gold standard science" to PROVE that these technologies are dangerous, and promote illness not health in our kids!! Thank you for persuing this issue!!
The commenter describes EMF hypersensitivity with ear and facial pain, difficulty avoiding exposure, and concern about children’s exposure at school.
I am hypersensitive to EMFs
young children are increasingly subjected to EMFs
I learned several years ago that I am hypersensitive to EMFs, and I know that I am due to pain that I experience in my ear and face. I take all precautions that I can to avoid them but of course I know total avoidance is impossible. I’m 74 years old. I am astonished that young children are increasingly subjected to EMFs in all walks of life, including at school. It is an outrage. Something must be done.
The commenter calls for removal of 5G towers, asserting that their EMF emissions harm the public.
TAKE ALL THISE 5G towers DOWN
TAKE ALL THISE 5G towers DOWN THEY ATE HARMING THE PUBLIC THE EMF!s they are emitting is unbelievable Pkease please take them all down they are hiring them in India
Loading more comments…