All HHS comments · page 159

Not a scientist and don't have any studies to tout, but as an opinion of a health-conscious American woman, I take precautions against extra EMF, RF and wireless radiation. We chose our house location because it is not located by a cell tower, we chose a manual electric meter instead of wireless, we have hardwired our home for wireless Internet and so on. I think with time and money, future studies will show these frequencies do more harm than good. I also think aesthetically, cell towers are polluting our beautiful landscape-there has to be another way to regulate towers and to transmit service. Thank you.

I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure.

I am responding from the perspective of a concerned citizen.

I have very important health issues. Wireless tv & other appliances don't work so good anyway.

I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence.

I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health.

Thank you for providing individuals, families, health care providers, researchers, and scientists with an opportunity to finally be heard on this critical public health issue.

Thank you for your time.

I am an individual who uses the internet, and I have a lot of concerns about electromagnetic fields, radiofrequency radiation, and wireless radiation exposure. I live near a tower, over which I have no control.

It's time to really take a look at what these things are doing to individual people, the harms that cannot be reversed, and a plan set up to protect "we, the people" of this country.

The Smart Meters that Eversource and National Grid are now installing on every house in Massachusetts are far more intrusive on our privacy than the Flock Cameras.

Smart Meters are far more dangerous to our health through the EMFs they emit continuously.

These Smart Meters have also been linked to fires, though it is hard to prove since utility companies nationwide rush in and grab them from any fire and they disappear.

So-I will be paying over $500 a year to have a "non-communicating" meter installed so my wife and I will not be subject to these EMFs which do far more damage to humans than they are admitting.

I urge you to prevent these life threatening meters from being put on my house to jeopardize our health, indeed our very lives. My wife has a heart condition and these EMFs will kill her. Sincerely, Brice Hereford- Conway, Massachusetts.

Dear HHS I am writing you that you conduct a full review of Cellular Tower Radiation. My plea includes the visible spectrum as well. It cannot be understated that such a study be undertaken. The Telecommunucations Act is preposterous in excluding health and environmental concerns in consideration of Cellular Communication Facilities. In fact the tolerance level for total radiation is the highest in the world. This is unacceptable; there has now been much study around the world in which human health issues (cancer rates etc) are markedly higher in vicinity of cellular facilities. India, of all places for instance has even provided maps over their dense population centers showing this correlation. There have also been studies indicating disruption to wildlife in multiple ways. I fear that even we are affected living in a good neighborhood because 5G (so called ‘low radiation’) radiation towers have been placed in a grid, while our house is not adjacent to one, I have been told there is nothing you can do if one is. As a Senior. I am not so worried as toward the end of my life my total life exposure may not total enough to be a factor in my decline but now with the cellular proliferation children today are the ones at risk for long term exposure. Is that not obvious when you see cellular transmission shields on top of apt buildings (next to children sleeping in bedrooms) in dense urban areas? It is a shame that our approval-guidelines for so many things are only based on immediate effect but long term exposure is not, so if something doesn’t kill you or effect you immediately it must be harmless. How could Glyphosate have been deemed harmless and approved if the effects of exposure were revealed? Likewise with Teflon, or PFases. I also take exception to the Strobing lights required on cell towers which exceed 200’. All are such eyesores to our landscape and our night skies which we need for peace and serenity instead of this growing phobia. Many of our most notable scenic landmarks and even mountaintops have been literally destroyed by such towers with 24/7 flashing lights. The worse is Sandia peak, Albuquerque NM with many others as well. Do we have any respect…

Read the full comment →

As someone who has EMF sensitivity the deployment of 5G towers everywhere including our neighborhood has been absolutely devastating.

Constant headaches, brain fog and inability to think straight.

I can’t even imaging 6G. Our people are being literally killed with this and no one cares.

This needs to stop now! We should be able to protect schools and kindergartens from 4G and 5G towers and no 6G technology!

It’s extremely detrimental to our health!

I am an informed citizen and parent. I request that federal agencies dramatically lower current exposure limits, adopt a rigorous and enforceable precautionary principle, and fund long-term independent research. Current limits are dangerously outdated and ignore exponential exposure growth. FCC/ICNIRP limits were set in the 1990s based on a single acute thermal model, for a world with a handful of cell towers and no Wi-Fi, no smart meters, no small cells, no 5G. That world no longer exists. The ambient RF environment has not merely grown -- it has multiplied. RF levels in Los Angeles were found to be 70 times higher than the EPA's own estimate from four decades earlier. Small cell deployment alone increases downlink RF emissions by a factor of 7 to 46. Bandara & Carpenter (Lancet Planetary Health, 2018) documented "planetary electromagnetic pollution" -- an unprecedented, compounding increase, with 68% of 2,266 reviewed studies showing significant biological effects. 5G densification makes this worse: millimeter waves require an order-of-magnitude increase in antenna density, placing transmitters at street level, in front of homes, schools, and hospitals. The public is being subjected to a massive, unconsented experiment in cumulative RF exposure, and the regulatory framework has not been updated. ICBE-EMF, Environ Health 21:92 (2022): current limits are based on invalid assumptions. Melnick et al., Environ Health (2026): applying EPA's own methodology, limits are at least 200x too high for cancer risk and 8-24x too high for male reproductive toxicity. The precautionary principle must be applied -- not merely acknowledged. The precautionary principle is codified in the Rio Declaration (Principle 15), the EU Treaty (Art. 191), and the Convention on Biological Diversity. Where there are threats of serious harm, lack of full scientific certainty shall not be used to postpone preventive measures. In the U.S., it has been systematically ignored in RF policy. FCC limits are set at the level of thermal injury -- the highest measurable effect -- rather than at a level that protects against non-thermal, chronic, or cumulative effects. This is a permissive threshold,…

Read the full comment →

Having reached out to Regulations.gov on September 22, 2026, regarding my Radiation Poisoning Sickness due to decades of microwave and directed energy assaults along with phone use, for the first time in over a year on Thursday September 24, 2026 to Friday September 25, 2026 I was allowed to fall into REM sleep and actually remembered my dreams. I was even allowed deep sleep not waking up until 9am on 9/25/26. However this reprieve came at a huge price. On Saturday, September 26, 2026, I was jolted awake by the intensity of directed energy assaults causing me severe head, neck, shoulder pain, increased heart rate, tinnitus and my brain stuck in fight or flight mode. The last time I was allowed REM sleep with an entire night of sleep was on 7/29/25 after my doctor placed a heart monitor on me. The following morning on 7/30/26 I was awaken at 3:50 am and 7am due to being microwaved evidenced by increased heart rate and body temperature. My doctor was able to determine a significant rise in my heart rate during these assaults. As a result of my comments on Regulations.gov and shared documents, my life is in grave danger as are the lives of my pets. Although I pray that tens of thousands are able to comment before the comment period ends in 9 days, I guarantee judging from the comments on Facebook and my current condition, many TI's stand to lose their lives. This morning at 3:55 am Monday October 12, 2026 I was microwaved awake, hit with scalar wave sleep deprivation frequencies and brain-mind control technologies causing fight or flight, racing thoughts and a dangerously high heart rate. Forced out of bed due to the high frequency beams causing high body temperature, heart palpitations and a racing heart, my cat who was sleeping with me displayed odd behavior and later had loose stools. I also had diarrhea. In addition to the technologies being used to torture me, HAARP is also being run over the Central Valley causing physical and mental incapacitation for all who are RF-EMF sensitive especially those of us with seizure disorder.

Je m'appelle Helene NOEL et suis francaise, enseignante et directrice d'ecole. J'ai personnellement subi des effets néfastes sur ma santé , liés aux rayonnements radiofréquences : j'ai commencé à être très fatiguée et avoir des problèmes de sommeil à partir de 1995, après avoir déménagé dans une tour au dernier étage, juste sous une antenne relais de téléphonie mobile. En 2003, je suis devenue insomniaque (réveil à 3h00 am tous les jours sans pouvoir me rendormir). EN 2010, j'ai été opérée d'un neurinome sous le crâne, sur la colonne vertébrale, à la Pitié Salpétrière. Le neuro chirurgien m'avait dit de m'éloigner de mon portable la nuit. Après avoir entendu cela, nous nous sommes renseigné et avons enlevé le wifi à la maison, mais l'été du passage de la 3G à la 4G à Paris en 2013, je suis devenue Electro Hyper Sensible : terribles maux de tête et début d' Alzheimer avec oublis de tout tout le temps, incapacité à me concentrer , incapacité à faire à manger à mes enfants , incapable de m'organiser, je me suis perdue dans la rue à 50m de chez moi (j'avais 45 ans) je n'arrivais plus à lire ou faire des opérations simple ou compter à l'envers, maux de ventre très importants, nouvelle allergie au gluten, sucres rapides et lactose, grosse disbiose, etc. J'ai fait un test Alzheimer à 45 ans à l'hopital de La Pitié Salpétrière (surtout avec des exercices physiques, et on m'a dit que le test était adapté aux personnes agées, et pas à moi) J'étais devenue incapable de travailler au passage de la 4G, et suis tombée en arrêt maladie pour 2 ans. Ce qui m'a sauvé : un voile anti ondes pour dormir, puis un déménagement à la campagne, où j'ai pu reprendre le travail en classe et une direction d'école. Pour vivre sans maux de tete et vertiges, je dois faire très attention à ne pas rester plus d'une minute avec un telephone portable ou plus de 15 min dans le wifi ou la foule (= avec beaucoup de téléphones portables ) et donc : je ne peux pas aller dans les grandes surfaces, pas de restaurants ou cinéma, pas de foule, etc) Le déménagement à la campagne a boulversé ma vie et celle de ma famille, car mon mari a dû rester travailler à Paris , ne pouvant revenir dans notre nouvelle…

Read the full comment →

I support HHS's efforts to investigate electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure, including radiofrequency radiation from 5G networks, cell towers, Wi-Fi, and other wireless technologies. However, I am deeply concerned that these technologies have been deployed on such a massive scale without sufficient long-term, independent research demonstrating their safety under real-world conditions. The American public should not be expected to accept widespread, involuntary exposure to these technologies and simply trust that they are safe. The burden of demonstrating safety should fall on the manufacturers, telecommunications companies, and regulatory agencies—not on the public to prove harm after exposure has already occurred. I have several serious questions that deserve transparent, evidence-based answers: What is a safe level of EMF exposure? How were current exposure limits established, and do they adequately account for cumulative exposure over years or decades? How much radiation do 5G towers and other wireless transmitters actually emit? What are the exposure levels in surrounding homes, schools, workplaces, and neighborhoods? Are these levels independently measured and made publicly available? What are the potential long-term health consequences of frequent, close-range exposure? Have we adequately investigated possible effects on neurological function, sleep, reproductive health, cellular processes, and cancer risk? What about children? Children are exposed to wireless technologies from increasingly young ages, including throughout the school day. What independent, long-term studies establish appropriate exposure limits for developing brains and bodies? How is cumulative exposure evaluated? People are surrounded by multiple sources of RF/EMF exposure simultaneously, including cell phones, Wi-Fi routers, Bluetooth devices, smart appliances, and nearby telecommunications infrastructure. Are current safety standards adequately accounting for these combined exposures? Who is conducting the safety research? How much of the available research is independently funded, and how are financial conflicts of interest identified and addressed? Why are technologies permitted to…

Read the full comment →

For approximately the past ten years, beginning around 2015, I have experienced significant neurological and physical health challenges, including chronic headaches, debilitating migraines, persistent dizziness, vertigo, cognitive dysfunction, and overwhelming fatigue. These symptoms have profoundly affected my quality of life and ability to function independently. I am particularly concerned about the possibility that electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure may contribute to or exacerbate my neurological symptoms. My concerns have been heightened by genetic testing that identified four single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within my CACNA1C gene. This gene encodes a component of the CaV1.2 voltage-gated calcium channel, which plays an important role in neuronal signaling, cellular calcium regulation, and nervous system function. The interpretation of my genetic testing suggested that these findings could indicate increased susceptibility to the biological effects of electromagnetic exposure. Although the relationship between CACNA1C variants and sensitivity to everyday electromagnetic fields has not been clinically established, I believe this is an important area deserving further scientific investigation. My experience raises questions about whether genetic variations affecting calcium-channel function could influence individual responses to environmental exposures, particularly among people already experiencing neurological dysfunction. Over the past decade, my headaches, dizziness, and other neurological symptoms have substantially interfered with my daily activities, physical endurance, cognitive functioning, and overall well-being. I am asking the Department of Health and Human Services to investigate whether genetic differences, including variations in genes involved in calcium-channel regulation, may contribute to individual susceptibility to electromagnetic exposures. I believe that research examining potential interactions between environmental electromagnetic fields, genetic predispositions, and neurological health could provide valuable information for patients like me who have spent years searching for answers. I respectfully request that federal…

Read the full comment →

Hello! I am responding from the perspective of a concerned individual. I appreciate the opportunity to voice my concerns and position on the subject of Electromagnetic Radiation. Although it's difficult to determine (definitively) the health effects caused by an INVISIBLE danger such as RF Radiation, I non-the-less felt compelled to voice my concerns.

The

ccc

I am responding from the perspective of a concerned individual. I appreciate the opportunity to voice my concerns and position of the subject of RF Radiation. Although it's difficult to determine the health effects caused by an invisible danger such as Radiofrenqency Radiation, I non-the-less felt compelled to voice my concerns.

The FCC and Telecom companies are seemingly out of control! They are putting up broadband lines, cell antennas and cell towers, smart meters, satellites and Data Centers wherever and whenever they want with little or no input from citizens... the proliferations is staggering!

The public seems to have no protection, no local control or authority over these dangerous and risky practices.

All of this continues to be rolled out at record speed and we the public aren't being informed of any sort of reviews or deployment with any of this; it's everywhere! Citizens deserve to have a vote in this very serious matter.

The FCC (a Captured Agency) and the Telecom Industry have too much power and authority and need to be better regulated. I don't think the health of citizens is a priority for them; money, as usual is the incentive.

I think it is imperative to have updated and thorough analyses pertaining to and including safety, exposure limits and human and environmental health impacts. Thank you for providing the opportunity to voice our concerns.

I find there’s no way to truly understand the effects, but I cannot sleep soundly in my bed, as we have a house full of WiFi and cell towers nearby by, and tired and wired most of the time, but when I go tent camping at the Smokey mountains Cade’s Cove - with no power, WiFi etc. I feel rested and calm with more energy, focus, and better sleep. I breathe more fully and feel more in tune to a healthier sleep and wake cycle. This also happens when I visit friends who live in a more remote area of Ga.. I live in a densely populated area of Greenville SC

I am responding as an individual Consumer, with an autoimmune disease, ongoing organ system(s) damage, that includes, but is not limited to nervous system damage. My background is "turnaround" Private Sector HC Operations - many patient groups/LOC's - multiple States. Followed by decades in Government, including but not limited to spanning two decades as an HHS Mandated Federal Position, required to exist in a State System, and identified issues with the Federal, State, to County - Local, etc., (i.e. "ALL sides"), on many topics regarding HHS activities - all levels of Govt. My types were charged to analyze, identify, state the facts & implement the Law and that included, but was not limited to defending them in litigation matters - WITH NO ERRORS ALLOWED due to potential "political fallout." Via at the time, a beyond corrupt Judicial System, spanning two centuries, not only regarding Health Care Company Defendants & but also due to chosen behavior & actions of their Counsel & Political & Special Interests "friends and supporters." Additionally, unfortunately, this ALSO, meant dealing with Corrupt Federal, State & County Politicians & their funders/controllers & handlers, Staff, DOJ, OIG, Judges, Hearing Officers, etc., including but NOT limited to DOJ Lawyers supposed to be representing my types as Government Counsel, whom at times were just as corrupt, if not more, as opposing Counsel - representing HC (Private & Government) Companies in legal matters, including as newly hired Defendant(s) Counsel, actually being recently former DOJ Attorneys, who were now making the big bucks, by selling out to be Counsel for Companies, via Law Firms, they were previously charged with, doing their job via the Law for Tax Payers and Patients as former Lawyers of DOJ - where many times they did NOT do their jobs based on facts, proven & indisputable, due to "politics." Additionally, as a Consumer, I've researched studies that have been ongoing for years, and at times, Legislative and Judiciary matters - pertaining to technologies implemented on ALL Americans, with little to no oversight, then bureaucracy regarding Special Interests for profit/influence/control, negatively…

Read the full comment →

Please accept this note from a lifelong Wanaque resident whose family history here goes back to the early 1930's, when my grandfather, Aldo Malatesta and his brothers built the Wanaque house that I grew up in and the one that I now own and live in, with their blood, sweat and joy to have such an idyllic and peaceful place that they and their descendents could call home. It was a place where we all could feel safe, protected and hopeful for the future.

In that nearly 100 years Wanaque has held a primary place in our hearts. All of my 8 siblings and I went to St Francis school, where I even had the privilege to teach Art for two years as a young professional. We belonged to The Memorial Cadets, and all the Wanaque sports teams, which my brothers coached as a way to give back to the town we called home. One of us made her career as a longstanding professional at Shippee's Pharmacy. We swam in Back Beach and skated on Meadowbrook Lake. I could go on and on with all the wonderful; memories and people that we have shared but you get the idea. I live in the smallest house in town, in a lovely little clearing just "over the mountain" from Lakeland High School. It is the closest in distance to the area where the proposed tower has been planned to be built.

The thought of this tower invading our space has created a stress unlike anything I have experienced before. Concern for our homes, our water, our air, soil and, especially, the children and folks who spend their days at Lakeland leads us to wonder if there is any protection for us at all from the unknown and, yes, even the known issues that can arise when a tower like this is dropped in the middle of a busy resdiential area. There is also a great deal of wildlife that make their natural homes in the woods between our homes and the school, and this could be a terrible fate for them as well.

Please use your heads and stop this atrocity from happening. It has already been halted once, let the reasoning behind that decision guide your judgement and give us the future we seek for our own decendents. Let the next hundred years be as pleasant and secure as the last hundred have been. Find another place for the tower where people won't be at the risk of harm.

I have been an RF (radio frequency) radio broadcast engineer for 60 years. I hold a General Class Radiotelephone License from the FCC. I have served as Chief Engineer for a number of radio stations, most of them 'full power' facilities in major markets (Boston, Philadelphia)/. Experience with the Radio Sprctrum ranges from the low end of the MW (AM Broadcast) band through the HF, VHF, UHF and 'microwave' bands. I do not have hands on experience with the mobile, personal communications services. The RF bands for these services are very high: Most well above 1 gHz (1 billion Hertz), ranging up yo 79 g

hz. This very complicated allocation system is managed by the World Radio Conference. Yes, high frequencies can be dangerous, BUT so can lower frequencies. What counts is the POWER; you are not going to be climbing up and placing your body in front of that antenna, are you? Even that is low - probaby less that 100 Watts. In the field (where we hang out), the electrical field from that antenna is reduced to a tiny value. The transmitter of the phone you are holding should be of more concern! There are many studies/articles - Google. Ordinarily we are immersed in dozens of radio fields wherever we are. We have been in these fields for over 100 years, No measurable damage -- Ever.

The Telecommunications Act of 1996 Section 704, needs to be challenged as being unconstitutional, and needs to be challenged in the Supreme Court of the United States of America. Specifically what needs to be challenged in the Telecommunications Act is the “environmental effects”. “SEC. 704. FACILITIES SITING; RADIO FREQUENCY EMISSION STANDARDS… (iv) No State or local government or instrumentality thereof may regulate the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with the Commission's regulations concerning such emissions.” I remember visiting the Thomas Jefferson Memorial in 1996. I read all the quotes etched in stone inside the beautiful memorial to a great man. A few years ago, I remembered one that was so significant, "I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man." - Thomas Jefferson Even though, Jefferson could never have imagined what life would be like 200 years in the future. This quote covers it. This wireless insanity is tyranny over the minds of all of us. Tyranny shows up in all sorts of forms and repression, and this invisible wireless stuff is in the category of "every form of tyranny over the mind of man." In the Declaration of Independence, it says "We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights, among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." And then I needed to put it all together....and then Martin Pall's journal article came out "Microwave frequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) produce widespread neuropsychiatric effects including depression". This was the missing piece to the challenging of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, specifically Section 704. Our Constitutional rights are being denied because this is Tyranny over the minds of Men, and we have the inalienable right to the pursuit of happiness, and since wireless technology causes depression and unhappiness in the minds of men, the Telecommunications Act of 1996…

Read the full comment →

It is harmful to all that lives including the Earth, Mother Gaia. This is not the way to go. We should think of other means instead of this. We are laughed at by the advanced aliens who monitor us destroying ourselves.

Having reached out on Sept 22, 2026 regarding my Radiation Poisoning Sickness due to decades of Microwave and directed energy weapons assault, for the first time in over a year on Thursday, Sept 24, 2026 to Friday Sept 25, 2026, I was allowed to fall into REM sleep and actually remembered my dreams. I was even allowed deep sleep not waking until at 9am on 9/25/26. However, this came at a huge price. On Sat, Sept 26, 2026, I was tortured awake in severe pain, increased heart rate, tinnitus and my brain stuck in fight or flight mode. The last time I was allowed REM sleep and an entire night of sleep was on 7/29/25 after my doctor placed a heart monitor on me. The following morning on 7/30/25 I was awaken at 3:50 am and 7am due to microwave assaults evidenced by increased heart rate, body temperature and tinnitus. My doctor was able to determine from the heart monitor reading a significant rise in my heart rate during these episodes. As a result of my comments on Regulations.gov and shared documents, my life is now in grave danger as are the lives of my pets. I pray tens of thousands are able to comment before the comment period ends in 9 days. However, I guarantee you judging from the many comments on Facebook and my condition this morning, hundreds of us TI's will lose our lives. This morning at 3:55 am, Monday, October 12, 2026, I was microwaved awake, hit with scalar wave sleep deprivation frequencies and brain-mind control technologies causing fight or flight, racing thoughts and a dangerously high heart rate. Forced out of bed due to the high frequency beams causing high body temperature, heart palpitations, a racing heart, and tinnitus, my cat who was sleeping with me displayed odd behavior and had loose stools. I also suffered diarrhea. In addition to the deadly technologies being used to torture me, HAARP is also being run over the Central Valley causing physical and mental incapacitation for us RF-EMF sensitive individuals.

I am writing as an individual with first-hand experience (Q2). I am from Israel. My field is computers and the internet, which makes what follows especially hard. How it started (Q3a-d) It began in 2016, or at least that is when I became fully aware of it. My wife and I came back from a vacation in an isolated place abroad and felt really unwell in our own home. I already had an RF meter, but it wasn't fast enough to show what was really happening in the house. After buying a better one, we found a cellular antenna in direct line of sight of our home, and many sources coming from our neighbors. Even before I knew there was a source in a room, I felt pain in my body, and where the pain was told me where the source was. My symptoms were: - Headaches of a very specific kind, like the feeling after being hit on the head. I get the same headaches from exposure to chemicals. - Exhaustion. - Body aches, like the flu. - Confusion, forgetfulness and difficulty finding words. - Difficulty concentrating and doing creative work. - Pain in my fingers, from wireless radiation and also from magnetic and electrical fields. - Sleep problems. The sources involved were Wi-Fi, mobile phones, cellular antennas, transmitting devices at home, and electrical and magnetic fields, including grounding problems. My wife is also sensitive, less than I am, but she suffers the consequences of commuting and working in places with Wi-Fi and antennas. Medical evaluation (Q3e) I took part in a study by a physician who is herself sensitive to radiation. After she received threats, she asked participants not to use the summary she had written, so I have no medical document to attach. What I did, and what changed (Q3f) - I switched off all transmitting devices and the Wi-Fi at home. - After four years of searching, we moved to an apartment with much lower levels. Even so, it took weeks of thorough shielding and fixing grounding and other electrical problems that were causing pain. - I stopped using public transportation. - I moved from the office to working from home and reduced my salaried work. I now teach mostly over Zoom. - I improved my diet, reduced alcohol and took vitamins to help cope…

Read the full comment →