All HHS comments · page 102

See comment attached.

*See Attached Testimonial From Another Innocent Individual Injured By Wireless RF Radiation

Kevin Mottus, Outreach Director

CA Brain Tumor Assn

Email: wirelessbiologicaleffects@gmail.com

*See Attached: Non-thermal Electromagnetic Field studies demonstrating harmful effects.

See comment attached.

*See Attached Testimonial From Another Innocent Individual Injured By Wireless RF Radiation

Kevin Mottus, Outreach Director

CA Brain Tumor Assn

Email: wirelessbiologicaleffects@gmail.com

See attached document for my comments.

I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence.

I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health.

Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.

See comment attached.

*See Attached Testimonial From Another Innocent Individual Injured By Wireless RF Radiation

Kevin Mottus, Outreach Director

CA Brain Tumor Assn

Email: wirelessbiologicaleffects@gmail.com

As a mother and a longtime Santa Monica resident, I want families to have clear, trustworthy information about wireless radiation and health. Technology is part of everyday life, and I want federal agencies to examine potential risks carefully and explain what is known, what remains uncertain, and what practical steps are justified by the evidence. I submit this comment as an individual member of the public, not as a scientific expert. My requests are informed by the peer-reviewed review cited below. I ask HHS and the FCC to conduct transparent, independent assessments of radiofrequency exposure that consider children, long-term and repeated exposure, and realistic conditions of device use. Mevissen and colleagues (2025) reviewed experimental animal cancer studies and reported high-certainty evidence for increased glioma and malignant heart schwannoma in male rats. The authors also emphasize that extrapolating these findings to human risk is complex. These findings warrant careful evaluation; they do not, by themselves, establish that everyday wireless exposure causes cancer in people. Please assess this review alongside its 2026 corrigendum, the underlying studies, and relevant human research, including findings that do not show harm. I respectfully request that the agencies: 1. Publish an accessible assessment that distinguishes biological changes from adverse health outcomes, animal findings from human evidence, and established conclusions from uncertainty. Explain study quality, exposure levels, limitations, and conflicting results. 2. Explain whether current exposure limits and compliance testing adequately address children, long-term use, and devices used close to the body. Identify where evidence supports current practices and where additional testing or research is needed. 3. Prioritize independent, reproducible research on developmental and neurological outcomes, reproductive health, and cumulative exposure, with transparent funding and conflict-of-interest disclosures. 4. Provide practical guidance on reducing unnecessary exposure where warranted, while preserving access to communication, education, and assistive technology. For HHS, please use this…

Read the full comment →

*See Attached: Non-thermal Electromagnetic Field studies demonstrating harmful effects.

Our comments are contained in the attached file and are supported by three published paper attachments.

Other scientific references are included in our submission.

See comment attached.

*See Attached Testimonial From Another Innocent Individual Injured By Wireless RF Radiation

Kevin Mottus, Outreach Director

CA Brain Tumor Assn

Email: wirelessbiologicaleffects@gmail.com

See comment attached.

*See Attached Testimonial From Another Innocent Individual Injured By Wireless RF Radiation

Kevin Mottus, Outreach Director

CA Brain Tumor Assn

Email: wirelessbiologicaleffects@gmail.com

See comment attached.

*See Attached Testimonial From Another Innocent Individual Injured By Wireless RF Radiation

Kevin Mottus, Outreach Director

CA Brain Tumor Assn

Email: wirelessbiologicaleffects@gmail.com

*See Attached: Non-thermal Electromagnetic Field studies demonstrating harmful effects.

I am submitting this comment as a consumer concerned about long-term exposure to wireless radiation from phones, Wi-Fi routers, cell towers, and other connected devices.

I urge HHS to conduct a thorough, independent review of whether current exposure limits adequately protect public health. This review needs to consider those most heavily exposed and should examine potential effects beyond tissue heating, including evidence concerning cancer, reproductive health, and children’s development.

Please prioritize research that reflects how people actually encounter wireless radiation: repeated exposure over many years, often from multiple sources and devices used close to the body. Assessments should consider signal strength, pulse patterns, duration, and combined exposure.

Please consider Melnick and Moskowitz’s 2026 analysis of animal data, which argues that existing exposure limits may inadequately protect against cancer and reproductive harm (https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-026-01288-6). I also ask HHS to evaluate Lai and Levitt’s review of exposure intensity, duration, and signal modulation (https://doi.org/10.1080/15368378.2022.2065683), and Scarato’s review of US regulatory gaps and proposed reforms (https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1677583). These papers warrant careful consideration alongside the broader evidence, including studies that have not found adverse effects.

I ask HHS to:

•Assess whether additional protections are needed for children, pregnant women, and other potentially vulnerable groups.

•Support long-term research with safeguards against industry conflicts of interest.

•Provide clear information about exposure and practical ways to reduce it, including wired alternatives in homes and schools.

•Recommend updated standards wherever the evidence shows that existing limits are insufficient.

Consumers should not have to navigate these questions alone. Please use this inquiry to advance transparent science, meaningful oversight, and public health protection.

See comment attached.

*See Attached Testimonial From Another Innocent Individual Injured By Wireless RF Radiation

Kevin Mottus, Outreach Director

CA Brain Tumor Assn

Email: wirelessbiologicaleffects@gmail.com

Please study EMFs, RFs and wireless radiation exposure. It’s been many years since these things were looked at and thins have changed dramatically since 2996. We need accurate updated information ASAP.

*See Attached: Non-thermal Electromagnetic Field studies demonstrating harmful effects.

"The precautionary principle instructs us that in the face of serious threats, a lack of scientific certainty never justifies inaction. The primary reason for inaction is the meme repeatedly cited by the wireless industry: there is no conclusive proof of harm. " -- Martin Blank PhD

Stop the madness. Uncontrolled proliferation of the wireless grid amounts to the largest medical experiment in human history, with no informed consent and no way to opt out short living off-grid in extremely remote locations.

I am against the widespread use of excessive Wireless radiation exposure. Everywhere we go there are towers and too much exposure that is unhealthy to our children and to all of us. I personally know individuals who have been exposed be in the schools that used excessive WiFi connections or in all public places. We are not paying attention to the health hazards of brain fog, headaches. Unexplained weakness and pain and many other health problems . Please be concerned . I believe there will be an epidemic of issues associated with prolonged excessive exposure to EMF and RF and wireless exposure

See attached file

RFI response on 10-20-26

refers to Requirements document: https://www.regulations.gov/document/HHS-OASH-2026-0397-0001

This RFI response is based on peer-reviewed research and Engineering knwledge,

Executive Summary

It’s well known, to EMF Engineers, that Near-field radiation can bring very intense radiation within inches to human organs (i.e. Brain, auditory channel, Eye, etc. ) primarily because being within particular frequency wavelengths and close proximity antennas can concentrate radiated energy to organ structures.

In 4-7-2023, Dr. Lai published a paper: Henry Lai* and B. Blake Levitt, Cellular and molecular effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields, Environ Health 2024; 39(3): 519–529 { https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2023-0023 } .

This paper integrates much knowledge gained over several decades in bio-electromagnetic research and points to a likely unifying mechanism which explains both the many adverse and beneficial effects seen with exposure to man-made EMFs. Dr. Lai paper cites many other studies over +44 years

Most of the RFI responses (below) reference Dr. Lai paper, which I felt it necessary to submit this relevant RFI to HHS {HHS–OASH–2026–0397}.