Preliminary investigations of the effects of low-level microwave radiation on spontaneous motor activity in rats.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 1975 · No effect · Low evidence

← Research stream
No effectLow evidencePaper 6137

Male rats exposed to 10.7 GHz (cw), 3 GHz (cw), or 3 GHz (pw) for 185 hours at ~1 mW/cm^2 showed no differences in post-exposure spontaneous activity compared with nonirradiated controls. A subset exposed to 3 GHz (pw) for 17 days at 25 mW/cm^2 also showed no…

Study snapshot

PublicationAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 1975
Study typeanimal
Reported directionNo effect
Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

Male rats were irradiated with microwaves of 10.7 GHz (cw), 3 GHz (cw), or 3 GHz (pw) for 185 hr with power densities of approximately 1 mW/cm-2. Spontaneous activity was automatically measured and analyzed in five amplitude classes, after irradiation had ceased. No differences were found between the irradiated and the similarly treated nonirradiated control rats. A few rats were exposed for 17 days to 3 GHz (pw) at 25 mW/cm-2. Here, again, the spontaneous motor activity was not affected. Before irradiation, these rats had been trained to constant peak performance in a 2-m long runway. Their running times remained unchanged by this treatment regimen and did not differ from those of nonirradiated control rats. So far, no deleterious effects of the microwave radiation used has been detected.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeanimal
Effect directionno_effect
PopulationMale rats
Sample sizeNot supplied
Exposuremicrowave · 10700 MHz · 185 hr; also 17 days (subset)
Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 74% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

Male rats exposed to 10.7 GHz (cw), 3 GHz (cw), or 3 GHz (pw) for 185 hours at ~1 mW/cm^2 showed no differences in post-exposure spontaneous activity compared with nonirradiated controls. A subset exposed to 3 GHz (pw) for 17 days at 25 mW/cm^2 also showed no change in spontaneous activity or runway running times versus controls.

Outcomes measured

  • Spontaneous motor activity
  • Runway running time (trained performance)

Limitations

  • Sample size not reported in abstract
  • Outcome assessment described only after irradiation had ceased (post-exposure measurement)
  • Exposure metrics reported as power density; SAR not provided
  • Details of randomization/blinding and statistical methods not provided in abstract
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "animal",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "microwave",
    "source": null,
    "frequency_mhz": 10700,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": "185 hr; also 17 days (subset)"
  },
  "population": "Male rats",
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "Spontaneous motor activity",
    "Runway running time (trained performance)"
  ],
  "main_findings": "Male rats exposed to 10.7 GHz (cw), 3 GHz (cw), or 3 GHz (pw) for 185 hours at ~1 mW/cm^2 showed no differences in post-exposure spontaneous activity compared with nonirradiated controls. A subset exposed to 3 GHz (pw) for 17 days at 25 mW/cm^2 also showed no change in spontaneous activity or runway running times versus controls.",
  "effect_direction": "no_effect",
  "limitations": [
    "Sample size not reported in abstract",
    "Outcome assessment described only after irradiation had ceased (post-exposure measurement)",
    "Exposure metrics reported as power density; SAR not provided",
    "Details of randomization/blinding and statistical methods not provided in abstract"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.74,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "microwave radiation",
    "rats",
    "10.7 GHz",
    "3 GHz",
    "continuous wave",
    "pulsed wave",
    "power density",
    "spontaneous motor activity",
    "runway performance"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": []
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1975.tb36017.x
PubMed: 1054244

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library