All HHS comments · page 273

Lives are being impacted in a negative way.

It is almost impossible to drive at night due to blinding headlights. LED lights are problematic. I am temporarily unable to see, either blinding me directly in my eyes coming towards me or when the lights appear behind me. Attempting to look away from the lights does not work and causes a dangerous loss of focus on the road.

Please research all the impacts to heath, society and safety.

I, personally, can cause my heart to become arrhythmic just by standing in front of a wireless router for a few minutes.

I am a tennis player, and know of at least 8 other tennis players, men and women, who have had unexplained cardiac episodes in the last 2 years. . They go to a cardiologist, who cannot find a cause. And these are healthy, active individuals!

Thank you for taking on this important issue.

I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure.

I am responding from the perspective of a parent and grandparent. My husband is chemically sensitive to all man-made (unnatural) chemicals, and his condition has gotten much worse ever since FPL installed their wireless meter outside our bedroom wall. We are being bombarded by radiation from the meter, and from both sides of our home from our neighbors' WIFI routers. I fear for our granddaughters who live in a totally wireless world, without even an analog clock in their home; everything is wireless! This nightmare has got to stop!

I support HHS taking an active role in examining the health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence.

I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health.

Thank you for the opportunity to be heard on this critical public health issue.

I experience a noticeable difference when exposed to higher levels of EMF, especially during sleep. I mitigate it the best I can but we need to create better awareness and protect our kids who are surrounded by this every day at school especially.

For the past few years, I have been regularly suffering from headaches that are sometimes quite disabling. I don't sleep well either. Since this year 2026, I have noticed a drop in the quality of my sleep and I also notice that people living in the same town as me (with several 5G antennas in a bird's-eye radius of less than a km) suffer from insomnia and often all wake up at the same time (3 a.m.). I don't know if it's due to the waves but I don't find my symptoms normal. I would like to point out here that I work in a school where the connections are multiple and on all the time (Wifi in addition to the wired system + students' mobile phones).

HI ON

Joe Rogan Experience #2560 - David Grusch

ABOUT 15MIN FROM BEGINNING GRUSCH IS TALKING ABOUT HIS KNOWLEDGE ABOUT "HAWANA SINDROM"ATTACKS

THIS IS WHY YOU NEED TO TALK TO DAVID GRUSCH IN ADDITION TO:

RICHARD LIGHTHOUSE

ANA TOLEDO

JESSE BELTRAN

HI LOOK FOR

JESSE BELTRAN

813-919-8355 - Call/Text Us

info@cosmicclarityconnections.orghttps://www.cosmicclarityconnections.org/scans

TO GET BETTER INFO ON THIS

I experience skin issues and ringing in my ears, sleep in an emf canopy and when wifi is off or when i am in areas without wifi connection, these physical ailments stop - please get focus on this issue fast

I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure. I am responding from the perspective of a concerned member of the public and mother. These frequencies interfere with molecular biology and are not resonate to our bodies. It impedes the proper functioning of our bodies and disrupts our wellbeing. I consider it to be an environmental toxin, personally. I first learned about the dangers of EMF exposure when listening to a Health Summit on the matter in 2018. I learned that baby monitors were a very high emitter and immediately stopped using ours to monitor our developing infant. My husband and I also took measures to connect our electronics to the internet with cables rather than use WiFi, including our phones. We also stopped using any Bluetooth devices. Sadly, there are spaces that I cannot protect my family from, such as my son's school. We were able to at least put him in a school that was not right next to a 5G tower, something that happened about half a mile from our house. We opted for a school that was a 15 minute drive from our house rather than expose him to 5G radiation while at school. If this isn't a crime against humanity, I do not know what is. My husband and I are exposed at work and anywhere else we go in town, really. With all the 5G mini towers on tops of buildings throughout town, we feel safest at home and when we're deep out in nature. I recently heard that nature has tech in certain areas so I will be sure to bring my EMF reader to check out my favorite nature areas. We all have the right to know what we are being exposed to, ideally the right to choose not to be exposed in the first place. It would be ideal if our government wanted protections in place for everyone's well being. If only well being was put before money and "convenience". It isn't very convenient to have leukemia or whatever other cancers they're linking to high EMF exposure. Our nervous systems are deeply affected. We all need to take a hard look at the reality of things instead of sticking our heads in the sand. This is not hard to understand. It's…

Read the full comment →

I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure.

I am responding from the perspective of a parent who is also affected negatively by the radiation. My oldest daughter developed unexplainable headaches and overall disturbing body sensations that left her distracted and unable to focus at school due to the close proximity of 2 cell towers placed literally in the elementary school yard. We took her out of school and within 2 days all of her symptoms disappeared. I am also very impacted and my health suffers when I am exposed to this radiation. I do my best to avoid it but it’s becoming less possible as more towers are being installed daily. I suffer from extreme brain fog and disturbing body sensations as well as extreme fatigue.

I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence.

I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health.

Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.

My name is Yosheeda Hyche. I have been targeted since 2003. So about 21 years. Loud cars through the night. Guided energy is sent into my house through my ears and a force hits the to of my head usually all night. These attacks have caused struggles with my memory eyesight sleep and other problems. Loud sudden noises from cars through the night and when I drive in the daytime. Unnatural heat in my home even when it’s cold. Followed on the road constantly. Color patterns on the road. I am a Christian and committed to the Lord Jesus. I have only survived all these years because of my God. I lost my job as a school teacher and office jobs.

I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure.

I am responding from the perspective of a concerned member of the public

I have personally been negatively affected by wireless towers in my health. I cannot get a proper sleep cycle when I am within 200 yards of a tower - it has also affected my cognitive abilities - I am unable to focus and do my work and have experienced sickness from said towers as well. Because of my sensitivity I am unable to travel to certain areas and have to be careful where I roam. This is unacceptable and deeply concerns me for all in my community that experience this.

I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence.

I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health.

Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.

I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure.

I am responding from the perspective of a [patient, parent, family member, caregiver, healthcare professional, researcher, advocate, concerned member of the public, or other].

PERSONALIZE YOUR COMMENT HERE: Tell HHS how wireless radiation has affected you, your child, your family, or someone you care about. You may describe the source and duration of the exposure, health effects experienced, when they began, whether reducing exposure made a difference, and how these experiences have affected daily life. If you are an ally, describe why you support people affected by wireless radiation and why you believe HHS should address this issue.

I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence.

I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health.

Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.

EMF exposure affects me very directly . My symptoms are irregular heart beat and micro-clotting of the blood, both putting me at high risk of heart attack or stroke. I cannot travel or live in a normal house, but can only survive in a house that has been protected from EMF's in every way possible.

Good day -

As an over 8.5-year target of government weaponization, I can assure you that many things most would assume as relegated to and specific of science fiction, are sometimes and unfortunately, objectively true.

In fact, when Arthur C. Clark made a statement about 'any sufficiently advanced technology being indistinguishable from magic,' he was probably imagining or considering some of the technologies that we see utilized - and sometimes for illegal, nefarious purposes - today.

More specifically, when one considers the government as (in effect) an organism, and that the prime directive of any organism is to survive and grow, then it is not so hard to extrapolate to the notion that when such institution has a history of dubious decisions and behavior, and thinks that such would be harmful to its prospects of long-term survival if exposed, that those (such as activists or whistleblowers) who were starting to or effective at such exposure, might find themselves on a soil whose government has now taken an adversarial position against them.

Indeed, as Targeted Individuals know, the tactics subsequent to such an illegal, due process-flouting decision (secret listing, probably in the Terrorist Screening Database) by state actors and/or their co-conspirators, can be quite painful and damaging.

While this is not the specific place to get into all of the absurdities and illegalities directed at targeted citizens, suffice it to say that patents do exist for the technologies that so many of them (us) complain about.

For instance, U.S. patent #4345220 is for a weapon termed the Vircator, and the features/technologies within such are certainly capable of producing various symptoms (such as burning of the skin, headaches, concussion-like symptoms, etc.) that many are increasingly complaining about.

Certainly, there are also various and related technologies which can do milder things, such as interfere with one's electronic devices.

But in closing, other than organized stalking (which I have been subject to for many years), I would guess that having "invisible weapons" pointed at oneself and one's property is the most common, consistent, and damaging horror faced by Targeted Individuals.

Thank you (and thanks for any action which can be taken to shut down this program, by anyone reading this).

I am submitting this comment as a consumer concerned and someone who is on the board of a nonprofit organization where we research the effects of toxins in our food and environment on child development, about long-term exposure to wireless radiation from phones, Wi-Fi routers, cell towers, and other connected devices. Cell Towers should not be legally allowed to be on schoolgrounds across America, yet they are in my town. I joined the School Health Advisory Council to address this issue as the head of the Student Environmental Health Subcommittee. However, it's an uphill battle, but if you make a law that cell towers can't be on school grounds, then the school district would have no choice but to take these cell towers down. I urge HHS to conduct a thorough, independent review of whether current exposure limits adequately protect public health. This review needs to consider those most heavily exposed and should examine potential effects beyond tissue heating, including evidence concerning cancer, reproductive health, and children’s development. Please prioritize research that reflects how people actually encounter wireless radiation: repeated exposure over many years, often from multiple sources and devices used close to the body. Assessments should consider signal strength, pulse patterns, duration, and combined exposure. Please consider Melnick and Moskowitz’s 2026 analysis of animal data, which argues that existing exposure limits may inadequately protect against cancer and reproductive harm (https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-026-01288-6). I also ask HHS to evaluate Lai and Levitt’s review of exposure intensity, duration, and signal modulation (https://doi.org/10.1080/15368378.2022.2065683), and Scarato’s review of US regulatory gaps and proposed reforms (https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1677583). These papers warrant careful consideration alongside the broader evidence, including studies that have not found adverse effects. I ask HHS to: •Assess whether additional protections are needed for children, pregnant women, and other potentially vulnerable groups. •Support long-term research with safeguards against industry conflicts of interest. •Provide clear…

Read the full comment →

I am concerned about the massive proliferation of LED lights in all areas of our lives, but particularly with respect to automobile headlights and street/outdoor lighting.

The harsh blue-white color temperature of these LEDs (say, 6000K and above) is dazzling to the eye at night. When I drive past cold white headlights, my vision takes longer to return to normal than when driving past even bright halogen headlights. In addition, my area has mostly replaced sodium street lighting with bright white LEDs. Rather than casting a diffuse glow that makes it easy to discern shapes at night, LED streetlights provide a bright area of light, while the area beyond if not illuminated as well appears even darker in comparison because the eye has to adjust to the bright and harsh LED lighting.

Next, bright white LED street lighting shines through (my) residential windows at night and makes it impossible for me to sleep without an eye mask, meaning I can no longer wake up to sunlight because I need to cover my eyes to block the bright light from the street lights. Harsh/bluish lighting has already been proven to disrupt the circadian rhythm of humans and wildlife alike.

Automotible headlights now are extremely bright to the point of causing temporary blindness at night. I feel far more unsafe driving at night now than I did ten years ago. I also am frequently blinded as a pedestrian when cars shine their headlights on me. I'm also under 30 with 20/20 vision. This is not a problem limited to those with poor eyesight.

I have also noticed that even when LEDs in public aren't necessarily too bright, they are often very intense light sources coming from small points that tend to be dazzling/blinding when you look directly at them. Street and vehicle lighting should, in my opinion, not only have a limit on the color temperature and brightness of lighting, but there should be a surface intensity light emission limit as well. For the same overall amount of light, a larger light fixture or one with a diffuser will be far easier on the eyes and less blinding than a light fixture or headlight that emits the same amount of light from a very small surface area.

I am severely affected by wireless radiation. It happened when I was in my car using my cell phone and trying out my newly received hearing aids with their blue tooth connection, Right afterwards whenever I passed a telephone line I noticed I felt a lot of pressure on my head and it wase extremely uncomfortable. After that I could not be around telephone lines, cell phones, cell towers, mortems, and other types of EMF sources. In fact I had to sleep in my car away from all these sources.

Someone told me about a neurotoxicologist who knew about this problem. He didn't have any answers at that time, but was researching the problem. Later someone told me to contact him again, which I did. The doctor had come out of retirement to research a medicine that had helped someone else. He gave me the same prescription to try and it cut my reactions to the EMF's by about half, but then again, he needed to retire. The Dr. was 96 or 97 at the time and his name is Dr. Gunnar Heuser or maybe Hueser. I could not have him help me anymore as I mentioned as he had retired again, Dr. Heuser may not be alive by now--that was about 4 years ago, but my regular doctors know about my problem.

Even though the medicine Dr. Heuser gave me cut my reactions about half, my life is still very affected. I now have a landline and can only use my cell phone in emergencies, cannot be around most other people's phones or computers, cell towers, and most modems which means there are many events I cannot attend, eat out unless far away from others phones, or spend anytime in my car if parked by a type of car that has high EMF output.

I have met other people also affected EMF's, and I am especially concerned for children who live or go to schools near cell towers I do not want ANYONE to go through what I have been though. Also I would like people who carry their phones which are always on, on their bodies or anyone else that may be affected by the EMF outputs knew about these risks.

Please help us!

Sincerely

Elsie Heather Reed email: hreed95959@yahoo.com

I am submitting this comment as a consumer concerned about long-term exposure to wireless radiation from phones, Wi-Fi routers, cell towers, and other connected devices.

I urge HHS to conduct a thorough, independent review of whether current exposure limits adequately protect public health. This review needs to consider those most heavily exposed and should examine potential effects beyond tissue heating, including evidence concerning cancer, reproductive health, and children’s development.

Please prioritize research that reflects how people actually encounter wireless radiation: repeated exposure over many years, often from multiple sources and devices used close to the body. Assessments should consider signal strength, pulse patterns, duration, and combined exposure.

Please consider Melnick and Moskowitz’s 2026 analysis of animal data, which argues that existing exposure limits may inadequately protect against cancer and reproductive harm (https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-026-01288-6). I also ask HHS to evaluate Lai and Levitt’s review of exposure intensity, duration, and signal modulation (https://doi.org/10.1080/15368378.2022.2065683), and Scarato’s review of US regulatory gaps and proposed reforms (https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1677583). These papers warrant careful consideration alongside the broader evidence, including studies that have not found adverse effects.

I ask HHS to:

•Assess whether additional protections are needed for children, pregnant women, and other potentially vulnerable groups.

•Support long-term research with safeguards against industry conflicts of interest.

•Provide clear information about exposure and practical ways to reduce it, including wired alternatives in homes and schools.

•Recommend updated standards wherever the evidence shows that existing limits are insufficient.

Consumers should not have to navigate these questions alone. Please use this inquiry to advance transparent science, meaningful oversight, and public health protection.

I am submitting this comment as a consumer concerned about long-term exposure to wireless radiation from phones, Wi-Fi routers, cell towers, and other connected devices.

I urge HHS to conduct a thorough, independent review of whether current exposure limits adequately protect public health. This review needs to consider those most heavily exposed and should examine potential effects beyond tissue heating, including evidence concerning cancer, reproductive health, and children’s development.

Please prioritize research that reflects how people actually encounter wireless radiation: repeated exposure over many years, often from multiple sources and devices used close to the body. Assessments should consider signal strength, pulse patterns, duration, and combined exposure.

Please consider Melnick and Moskowitz’s 2026 analysis of animal data, which argues that existing exposure limits may inadequately protect against cancer and reproductive harm (https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-026-01288-6). I also ask HHS to evaluate Lai and Levitt’s review of exposure intensity, duration, and signal modulation (https://doi.org/10.1080/15368378.2022.2065683), and Scarato’s review of US regulatory gaps and proposed reforms (https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1677583). These papers warrant careful consideration alongside the broader evidence, including studies that have not found adverse effects.

I ask HHS to:

•Assess whether additional protections are needed for children, pregnant women, and other potentially vulnerable groups.

•Support long-term research with safeguards against industry conflicts of interest.

•Provide clear information about exposure and practical ways to reduce it, including wired alternatives in homes and schools.

•Recommend updated standards wherever the evidence shows that existing limits are insufficient.

Consumers should not have to navigate these questions alone. Please use this inquiry to advance transparent science, meaningful oversight, and public health protection.