All HHS comments · page 148

I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure.

You likely know about the Clinton administration's 1992 Telecommunication Act. Prior to it being passed, telecommunication companies were prohibited from building cell towers within close proximity of schools, hospitals, medical clinics, day care and senior care centers. Why? Because strong Wi Fi (RF radiation) is not healthy. It is radiation. Human bodies perceive it as a foreign body and our immune system responds. Eventually our immune system fatigues and our bodies inflammatory response leads to disfunctions like diabetes and cancers. The passing of the 1992 Telecommunication Act rescinded that protection. How is it we knew to put protections in place, for our most vulnerable populations, and then pretended we did not know? Politics, greed and ignorance. You see the ill effects of strong Wi Fi (RF radiation) in your friends, families and neighbors every day. RF radiation stresses the nervous system, the immune system and eventually erodes good health. The statistics of alarming numbers of what were rare cancers are indisputable. There are volumes of reliable independent research on the damaging effects of RF radiation. If we do not have our good health nothing else matters. You were put in the position to act on behalf of yourself, your family, friends and country in this serious matter. I pray that you have the clarity, courage and wisdom to put reasonable safeguards in place.

Thank you for taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence.

I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health.

Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.

I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure.

I am responding from the perspective of a concerned member of the public

I know several people who have been adversely effected by EMF's. Especially from smart meters. This technology needs to be better tested for potential harm it does to the human body. Even subtle disturbance should be taken under consideration. Who knows the long term effects of those subtle frequencies and how it can add up to the cause of this cronically ill nation.

I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence.

I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health.

Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.

Stevn Forman

I have a friend who is very isolated because of electromagnetic fields, she can't even watch television. I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence.

I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health.

Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.

My life is no longer the same. I suffer from a serious thyroid condition and symptoms that prevent me from leading a normal life.

As soon as I pick up the phone, I start to experience pain in my bones and breasts.

I developed a large lump in my breast five years ago, and that is exactly where it hurts when I pick up the phone.

I suffer from dizziness and difficulty keeping my balance,

a cold, burning sensation in my head and fatigue. I often experience arrhythmias and paroxysmal tachycardia.

Lately, I’ve been feeling worse because I live not far from a 5G mast.

How can one protect oneself when Wi-Fi is everywhere?

How can one work in this state?

You must acknowledge that you are destroying the lives of adults and children.

But perhaps that is exactly what you want.

Cell phones burn my hands if I hold onto them. Cell towers activate a hystemine reaction in nerves that were damaged from herpes virus. Extremely [ainful feels like a wasp bite, to a 3 degree burn. Sometimes lightening bolts that go from top of my sho0ulder to stomach to bottom of my feet. It impacts my daily life because I cant go to the movie theater or to certain grocery stores. People think I am crazy but when I am traveling my body gets hives before we go around the bend and see a gigantic cell tower in the distance.

I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure.

I am responding from the perspective of a [patient, parent, family member, caregiver, healthcare professional, researcher, advocate, concerned member of the public, or other].

PERSONALIZE YOUR COMMENT HERE: Tell HHS how wireless radiation has affected you, your child, your family, or someone you care about. You may describe the source and duration of the exposure, health effects experienced, when they began, whether reducing exposure made a difference, and how these experiences have affected daily life. If you are an ally, describe why you support people affected by wireless radiation and why you believe HHS should address this issue.

I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence. My sister is so affected by electromagnetic frequencies that she is unable to leave her house because especially her heart rate may go as high as 175 or may drop to dangerous levels. Her entire body suffers from exposure to EMFs.

If you look at the businesses that are selling items to help people with this problem of sensitive to EMFs, you will realize it is a real problem that many people have.

I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health.

Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.

I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure.

I am responding from the perspective of a concerned member of the public.

Wireless radiation has affected me because I have been forced to allow smart meters be installed at my home. The electric meter was placed on the outside of my kitchen. I was told to allow them to install it or police would be called. My local health group sent many documents to the Kansas Corporation Commission and they have not helped to protect our health or property. One friend is sensitive to wireless radiation and avoids groups do to phone and other radiation. In 1970 my Father felt ill while working for KG&E the Electric Company at their substation. He died from a cardiac arrest before his buddy could get him to the hospital leaving my Mother to raise four young children on her on. I support people affected by wireless radiation because their health is important to me and I believe HHS should address this issue because the Kansas Corporation Commission has not protected Kansans.

I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence.

I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health.

Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.

I am fearful of cancer and other possible side effects if these technologies especially with our children's cancers on the rise.

Please stop them all frim killing us with their "technologies"

I have a friend who is very sensitive to electromagnetic radiation and it makes her sick. She cannot live as a normal person.

I have a neighbor who is extra sensitive. Ultimately, he had to move. He surveyed the neighbors within a radius of one block of him. Many had the onset of severe headaches they had not experience before. His dog developed symptoms. Once they both moved 20 miles away, they both recovered from symptoms.

I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure.

I am responding from the perspective of a musician.

Although I don't personally notice affects from wireless radiation, I know it is something that should be reduced because I look at studies on bees and small animals that are harmed by wireless radiation. And we don't know how it is affecting the plant world around us. I want to live in the most healthy environment possible, and one step toward that is limiting wireless radiation.

I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence.

I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health.

Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.

I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure.

I am responding from the perspective of a parent, caregiver, researcher, and concerned member of the public.

I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence.

I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health.

Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.

I am so thankful these things are being talked about and investigated! There’s been many links and correlation with EMF and many health issues! MAHA is a blessing!

A detached agency from the US government that is tied to the pentagon is using these weapons everyday against innocent civilians.

They need to be stopped.

Constant harassment everyday. All started January 1st 2026 after I criticized ICE online. Non stop.

I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure.

I am responding from the perspective of a concerned member of the public.

I personally feel better when in nature or an area where there’s no heavy EMF. I feel more clear, clean, and can appreciate nature more.

I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence.

I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health.

Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.

I am submitting this comment in response HHS's Request for Information on EMFs, RF Radiation and Wireless Radiation Exposure.

As a concerned member of the public, I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, epidemiology, biology and public health should address issues with the potential to affect human health, considering both the scientific evidence as well the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected.

This is unconstitutional! The FAA is supposed to stop things like this! You’re a murder if you don’t! Don’t be evil! Help mankind!! Stop this tyranny!!!

This is unconstitutional! The FAA is supposed to stop things like this! You’re a murder if you don’t! Don’t be evil! Help mankind!! Stop this tyranny!!!

Hola soy de Bogotá Colombia ya hace unos años instalaron una cosa de estas al lado de mi casa y desde hay el ambiente en la casa se siente raro siempre hay como un pitido o sonido en mis oídos y el cansancio se siente desde que me levando como si no ubiera descansando al dormir cada día esto es peor de lo que parece saludos

https://nationalhealthfreedom.org/take-action-let-hhs-know-the-risks-of-wireless-radiation