All HHS comments · page 117

1. & 2. I am responding as: an individual 3a. Type of wireless or RF/EMF sources involved (e.g., mobile phones, Wi-Fi, smart meters…)mobile phone and SMART meter 3b. Nature, duration, frequency, and approximate timing (e.g., years):years, not certain exact length of time as I avoid using a cell phone 3c. Adverse health effect(s) experienced:my left ear is painful when I try to use my cell phone on that side. 3d. Time from first exposure to first appearance of adverse health effects; and did a change in exposure coincide with the onset of adverse effects:I know that in 2012 when a SMART electric meter was installed on my prior home, I had sudden-onset tinnitus which never went away. I also experienced abrupt sleep interruption at 1 am, 2 am, 3am most nights. The meter was on the outside of my bedroom wall about 10 feet from my head while in bed. 3e. Was medical evaluation or treatment sought? (Optionally:) Was there a diagnosis?No medical help sought. No diagnosis. 3f. Were steps taken to reduce or eliminate exposure, and were there subsequent changes in the effects?For today I minimize cell phone use and when I do use it hold it on the right side to prevent the discomfort/pain. In 2012 I put aluminum foil on the inside wall of the bedroom on the meter side. Holding the cell phone on the non-affected side is the only way I can use a cell phone for verbal. The aluminum foil on the wall was in place for years, it may have helped. 3g. Any supporting documentation? This includes Scientific Reports, exposure measurements, or other relevant information:Many studies exist but studies warning of harms are not accepted by the decision-makers. Only studies that are favorable to industry seem accepted. But try listening to AM radio nowadays-during the night it is not possible to hear most stations for the multiple interferences of RF waves. Even FM radio transmission is poor, especially during the night hours. And while traveling, you drive into heavy fields of EMF audible on the car radio. Additional Details you would like to share about your experiences of adverse health effects you believe to be associated with exposure to wireless radiation or EMF's:I believe the many…

Read the full comment →

See comment attached.

*See Attached Testimonial From Another Innocent Individual Injured By Wireless RF Radiation

Kevin Mottus, Outreach Director

CA Brain Tumor Assn

Email: wirelessbiologicaleffects@gmail.com

*See Attached: Non-thermal Electromagnetic Field studies demonstrating harmful effects.

Hi, i am a cancer survivor. Capillary thyroid from resumption and received overdise of RAI. Everytime I enter a store, I get tge needle price all over my body, and electric shock everytime I use my 56 phone, I used to have emf prote too on my ph ,

Also when near 6G towers,I attended a funeral in nJ , I felt it evrn in the church, saw nearby gasoline station about 1.5 to 2 miles away is a 56 tower

I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure.

I am responding from the perspective of a parent, family member and concerned member of the public.

Wireless radiation has negatively affected several people I know and care about over the past 12 years. It has majorly impacted critical areas of their lives such as housing security, employment, school attendance, finances and above all, their physical health and emotional well-being. It is imperative that the HHS assess this issue. It pertains to essential human rights.

I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence.

I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health.

Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.

I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure.

I am responding from the perspective of a parent and a highly concerned member of the public.

The proper role of government and the agencies created is not to allow corporations or different branches of government to experiment on the citizens. YOUR ROLE IS TO PROTECT THE PEOPLE FROM HARM BEFORE EVERYTHING ELSE.

It is not acceptable, nor Constitutional, for Congress to give power to an agency that infringes on the rights of the people to be free from what are essentially experiments. Those who suffer impacts already are ignored. A clear example is the entire medical establishment. Medical care has been perverted by sick incentives, and the proposed solutions do not mitigate the harms that have been caused. The same is going on with the FCC and the regulations that prevent towns and cities to negate contracts with companies like Verizon and AT&T—to try and stop the 6G and who knows, eventually 12G?, towers and the constant bathing of people in radiation exposures and wireless pulses..

I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence. Private citizen groups comprised of those opposed need to be at the table as we are ultimately the largest stakeholders, and in fact the people that fund all of it.

I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health.

Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.

Leadership is not about being in charge. It is about taking care of those in your charge.

- Simon Sinek

Good day. I have been targeted since birth, but became aware of my targeting/ harassment/ human trafficking in 2024 in my previous residence. I would wake up to red welts on my neck and face, an my ear was also red, inflamed and swollen. These weapons used against me are causing my face to appear much older than I am in just two years. My face has rapidly lost its elasticity. The nerves around one of my teeth are deteriorating and my gums are now very sensitive and painful and bleed often when I brush them. The radiation has caused the whole right side of my face, neck and ear to become very painful to the point that I have to take prescription pain medication. The radiation has caused thinning and brittle hair, clumps of hair falling out, sensitive scalp and bald spots. I experience tremors and brain fog, confusion and anxiety. I often wake up to blurry vision and red eyes. I also get heart palpitations and body vibrations when hit with these weapons. Thank you for allowing me to share my experiences.

It is well documented that EMFs beyond the acceptable range can cause innumerable health problems and exacerbate existing ones.

As someone with electrical sensitivity and an autoimmune condition caused by mold and mercury exposure I can attest to the negative impact of high range EMFs. These include debilitating headaches, visual problems, dizziness and severe nerve pain.

EMFs are also known to disturb pollinators and birds among others. The science is in and we need to be wise in our use of technology. Technology is supposed to make our lives better not hurt us and everything around us

The science industry is flooded with scientific information concerning this issue of electromagnetic fields (EMFs), radiofrequency (RF) radiation, and wireless radiation exposure and the mere fact that the question continues to be sought for response leads one to believe that there is enough concern to request comments so I appreciate the opportunity in hopes my comments are weighed and taken seriously. HHS/NIH knows already of the emergence of technologies in the arena of humans and health-care and our input requires swift action. As a nation we have embarked upon an experimental era of coexisting with emerging technologies: artificial intelligence, biotechnology, brain computer interface technology, nanotechnology, directed energy, and quantum technology (CRS IF1110). I have become victim subject to dangerous levels of wireless radiation exposure. I can't upload images for evidence because my library of intellectual property containing pictorial works have yet to be properly documented and registered with the U.S. Copyright Office. Emerging technologies coupled with 5G millimeter EMR is the commonality between biology, biotechnology, and IoT wireless connectivity, architectural infrastructures are the backbone of research and experimental development and discovery fueling the 21st Century Bioeconomy. Humans and health-care are inclusive and have become the bedrock foundation harnessing engineered programmable artificial DNA/RNA consumer cellular technologies, operatable only by means of wireless internet of things connectivity. Without the powerful use of radiation electromagnetics, radiofrequency radiation, and influx of internet of things Wi-Fi wireless connectivity devices: antennas, sensors, biosensors, RFID tags, biotechnology and recent developments of chemical technology vaccines coupled with directed energy there would not exist wireless radiation exposure neither could there be excitation operation of these materials, devices, tools and communication infrastructures. With the ongoing deployment of 6G and the coexistence of artificial intelligent in humans, brAIn and health-care transparency and action is required including readdressing current laws…

Read the full comment →

I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure.

I am responding from the perspective of a mother, wife and member of society.

I along with many others am sensitive to EMFs. Headaches and general not feeling well. Please don’t go to 6G as we already have problems. I believe that children’s brains can be affected. Please conduct extensive research before doing anything else for the good of everyone.

I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence.

I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health.

Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.

*See Attached: Non-thermal Electromagnetic Field studies demonstrating harmful effects.

I find these towers have been a harm. My husband and I suffer from brain fog when we are home . They are everywhere now. My husband recently passed from a metastatic cancer turbo of lung and liver and health issues like this caused by this radiation that we can’t do anything about.

I tried and tried to send you part of a scientific journal explaining the hazards of EMFs for children, but kept getting an error message. Let's see if the URL for this article will be enough to send: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6701402/

*See Attached: Non-thermal Electromagnetic Field studies demonstrating harmful effects.

I have been affected my smart meters, close proximity of cell towers, and Wi-Fi. Gas company moved a meter on the back side of my house to the front side less than 1 /12 feet from the head of my bed. They installed a smart meter (I had NO SAY in this). I started waking up for no reason and had difficulty getting back to sleep; unexplained nose bleeds; and a digestive condition started causing me problems at night when it normally calms down! I consulted with an EMF expert, and she immediately found the issue. I have spent $100s (including expert's fee) on blocking material, etc. I contacted engineer at Cascade Natural Gas, and he gave me the typical smart meter "no problem" song and dance. Luckily, I don't run Wi-Fi in my house since I had all connections hard wired. Wi-Fi in hotels and other lodging has cause same issues (primarily sleep). When I am staying in motels, etc. I turn off or unplug (if possible) wi-fi routers etc. I have purchased various personal shielding (again several $100s) that I use when sleeping in motel, etc. I have friends that are more sensitive than I am!!

I implore the HHS to take action on these issues! Affects are REAL!

*See Attached: Non-thermal Electromagnetic Field studies demonstrating harmful effects.

I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure.

I am responding from the perspective of a concerned member of the public. I am concerned about my own health but especially what happens to children. I have been attempting to protect myself by using emf protection to help reduce radiation. Friends and relatives are doing the same especially those near 5g towers. I limit smart devices and appliances and have no smart phone.

I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence.

I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health.

Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.

I would very much like to know why, according to NASA, there is a "man made barrier" or "bubble" of Very Low Frequency radio waves surrounding the entire planet (see link below). Was this created accidentally or incidentally (seems extremely doubtful, but please let us know)? Has this been created intentionally? If so, for what purpose? What kind of effect is this or might this be having on the 6-8 billion inhabitants of the planet? Is the number of people potentially being affected by this perhaps sufficient to demand that these questions be answered in the PUBLIC'S INTEREST?

https://www.nasa.gov/missions/van-allen-probes/nasas-van-allen-probes-spot-man-made-barrier-shrouding-earth/

I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure. I am responding from the perspective of a concerned member of the public. When WiFi became popular I was onboard. Shortly afterward I noticed that I no longer felt well on an every day basis. After doing extensive research I discovered that the radiation from WiFi and cellular phones use EMF radiation and is damaging to humans, animals, bees and plants, and every progression, from 3G to 4G and finally 5G (which uses millimeter waves, the same type of waves that are used by the military in their radar and microwave-based and wireless weapons) became more dangerous and more damaging to humans, animals, bees and plants. Once I eliminated the sources of EMF radiation in my home I began to fell better almost immediately and almost immediately my health improved. The industries that profit from this technology has always claimed that the technology was harmless without ever doing honest independent studies to prove what they were saying. The only studies that they quote was VERY HEAVILY and intensionally biased in their favor. When truly independent studies were finally done it debunked that biased studies and honestly and accurately proved that the EMF radiation was without a doubt harmful to humans, animals, bees and plants!!! It is long overdue to heavily regulate this technology and ban the placement of towers and other devices that capture and/or relay this EMF radiation within at least 500 feet of homes, schools and other buildings where people and animals are found and an IMMEDIATE ban and removal of ALL so called Smart Meters that have been installed where people and animals reside MUST be put in place!!! I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific…

Read the full comment →

I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure.

I am responding from the perspective of a [patient, parent, family member, caregiver, healthcare professional, researcher, advocate, concerned member of the public, or other].

PERSONALIZE YOUR COMMENT HERE: Tell HHS how wireless radiation has affected you, your child, your family, or someone you care about. You may describe the source and duration of the exposure, health effects experienced, when they began, whether reducing exposure made a difference, and how these experiences have affected daily life. If you are an ally, describe why you support people affected by wireless radiation and why you believe HHS should address this issue.

I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence.

I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health.

Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.