All FCC comments · page 22

2,415 public comments, newest first, 20 per page. Keep scrolling to load more.

#421Hi. I suffer from Electro Hypersensitivity, which has limited my life drastically, caused the end of my m…by Dr Debby Baskin » 2026-10-22
AI summary & topic connections
  • Sensitivity & health experiences: I suffer from Electro Hypersensitivity, which has limited my life drastically, caused the end of my marriage, and caused me 3-4 decades of illnesses no one had any diagnosis for.
  • Sleep & neurological concerns: After seeing ear specialists, due to the unrelenting tinnitus, and neurologist for the malignant insomnia and migraines, and no one could find anything wrong with me.
  • Cancer & tumors: Also the study done a few years ago by the National Toxicology Institute shows clear evidence of RFR causing cancer in rats.
  • Children, schools & development: You are the people who can and must work to reverse the skyrocketing diseases that are directly related to the installations of cell towers near homes and schools and hospitals, and our fire stations which are hotbeds of cancer!
  • Biological mechanisms & metabolism: We urgently need to listen to the research that shows carcinogenicity and cellular damage WAY below current standards of heating!!
  • Disability, access & daily life: We also need to make safe hospital and doctors offices ASAP so those of us who already are suffering this dis -ease, have a safe place to go for health care.
  • Towers, antennas & siting: You are the people who can and must work to reverse the skyrocketing diseases that are directly related to the installations of cell towers near homes and schools and hospitals, and our fire stations which are hotbeds of cancer!
  • Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: I fear needing to go into a hospital with WIFI, as it makes me instantly very sick.
  • Wildlife & environment: It took me over 10 yrs to learn how to remediate my environment to get as well as I seem to be able to get.
  • Exposure limits & testing: I feel there needs to be a total new perspective on the well know adverse health effects of Manmade Radiofrequency Radiation or RFR, and a complete revamping of our safety standards.
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: The declassified Naval Military Research documents easily available on the internet, on the subject of how man made radiation affect the human body, are from the 50's and again in the 1970's clearly showing evidence of damage to every system of our bodies from this radiation.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110083146 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083146 Hi. I suffer from Electro Hypersensitivity, which has limited my life drastically, caused the end of my marriage, and caused me 3-4 decades of illnesses no one had any diagnosis for. I now know what it is caused by. After seeing ear specialists, due to the unrelenting tinnitus, and neurologist for the malignant insomnia and migraines, and no one could find anything wrong with me. I had to begin to look out of the box for other explanations. I found this is more common than I had any idea, and millions like me are suffering from this sensitivity and are simply canaries in the coal mine. We are showing how harmful this out of control ubiquitous RFR is. I live in a shielded home and use only wired communications. It took me over 10 yrs to learn how to remediate my environment to get as well as I seem to be able to get. I have lost my freedom to travel or even go to visit a friend at their home. I fear needing to go into a hospital with WIFI, as it makes me instantly very sick. I feel there needs to be a total new perspective on the well know adverse health effects of Manmade Radiofrequency Radiation or RFR, and a complete revamping of our safety standards. Our old standards set in 1996 are BEYOND outdate and totally wrong. The declassified Naval Military Research documents easily available on the internet, on the subject of how man made radiation affect the human body, are from the 50's and again in the 1970's clearly showing evidence of damage to every system of our bodies from this radiation. Also the study done a few years ago by the National Toxicology Institute shows clear evidence of RFR causing cancer in rats. There are thousands of studies showing this is harmful, and most other first world countries have much more rigid standards. The toxic nature of these emissions and devices needs to be told to the population so they can make informed decision about wiring their homes and using wired communications, if we want to see cancer and a host of thousands of other illness on the rise start to decline. We also need to make safe hospital and doctors offices ASAP so those of us who already are suffering…

Read the full comment →

#422Attachment-only filingby Sharon Goldberg » 2026-10-22
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110083145

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083145

Official documents · 4

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#423Attachment-only filingby Katie Alvord » 2026-10-22
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110083144

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083144

Official documents · 1

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#424Attachment-only filingby Debra L Trublood, Debbie Trublood » 2026-10-22
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110083142

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083142

Official documents · 2

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#425My first experience with EMFs was in the year 2000 when I purchased my first cell phone it was a 2g/3g. T…by Phyllis D. Hunter » 2026-10-22
AI summary & topic connections
  • Sensitivity & health experiences: The adverse effects I began experiencing was trouble sleeping and headaches.
  • Sleep & neurological concerns: The adverse effects I began experiencing was trouble sleeping and headaches.
  • Children, schools & development: low-frequency electromagnetic fields cause DNA strand breaks in normal cells https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3897901/ Health effects of electromagnetic fields on children https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7642138/ Neurophysiologic effects of radiofrequency and microwave radiation.
  • Pregnancy & reproduction: low frequency and wireless communication electromagnetic fields https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12179773/ Impact of electromagnetic radiation on human reproduction health: Causes, consequences, and potential therapeutic approaches https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1687850725007228 LIVING WITH ELECTROHYPERSENSITIVITY A Survival Guide http://www.weepinitiative.org/livingwithehs.html Extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields cause DNA strand breaks in normal cells https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3897901/ Health effects of electromagnetic fields on children
  • Biological mechanisms & metabolism: I also provided data to this website as Citizens Scientists: https://globalemf.net/ Sources: Electromagnetic field induced biological effects in humans https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27012122/ Electromagnetic fields act via activation of voltage-gated calcium channels to produce beneficial or adverse effects https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3780531/ Blank, M.
  • Towers, antennas & siting: Pall MD, MSc, PhD, Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences, Washington State University, he points out that there are eight distinct and primary ways that man-made EMFs can cause harm, which he outlined in 5G Risk: The Scientific Perspective – Compelling Evidence for Eight Distinct Types of Great Harm Caused by Electromagnetic Field (EMF) Exposures and the Mechanism that Causes Them."
  • Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: My first experience with EMFs was in the year 2000 when I purchased my first cell phone it was a 2g/3g.
  • Wildlife & environment: We are bioelectrical systems and environmental exposure to artificial EMFs interact with fundamental biological processes in the human body and all life on this planet for example the BEEs.
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: As an IT professional, I asked the question why and started doing some research.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110083141 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083141 My first experience with EMFs was in the year 2000 when I purchased my first cell phone it was a 2g/3g. The adverse effects I began experiencing was trouble sleeping and headaches. So, I decided to remove the cell phone from my bedroom and the problems with sleeping and waking up with headaches stopped. As an IT professional, I asked the question why and started doing some research. Distance is key to reducing exposure and learning simple convenience changes. I began studying and researching the biological effects that man-made EMF exposures have on humans and other living organisms for years. My studies and research with health care professionals, scientists, researchers, journalists , EMF Mitigation professionals and Building biologists. We are bioelectrical systems and environmental exposure to artificial EMFs interact with fundamental biological processes in the human body and all life on this planet for example the BEEs. My next major challenge was in 2011, I could no longer work in electronic environments, because of my sensitivity to all of the electro-pollution that has now filled our environments. I cannot take airplane trips, be in large crowds, and going into to town is overwhelming on my nervous system. I live in Rural area in Nature where this is little exposure to the EMF toxins. I can feel the difference when I am in a Natural harmonic environment vs the city full of electro-pollution. I am living with Electro-hypersensitivity. When I am overwhelmed, it takes days for me to recover. I have experienced the following symptoms: Trouble Sleeping Headaches and migraines difficulty concentrating dizziness irritability Heart palpitations, irregular heartbeats, fast heartrate fatigue weakness depression ringing in the ears the phone when it rings sends a painful shock through my body I now help people with EMF mitigation support, education as to source awareness, safer products, potential Health and well-being consequences, EMF mitigations and simple things they can do to reduce their health and well-being exposure. We have to consider EMFs as just one of the many possible factors in the Rising…

Read the full comment →

#426Attachment-only filingby Alexander HELIAS » 2026-10-22
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110083140

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083140

Official documents · 5

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#427Approximately 10% of my patients have a bad reaction to strong electromagnetic radiation fields. These pa…by Dr. John Ruhland, John Ruhland » 2026-10-22
AI summary & topic connections
  • Children, schools & development: For instance, in schools and multi-tenant buildings, but even near single-family homes and businesses.
  • Towers, antennas & siting: These patients have an allergic-type reaction and/or a sensitivity to high frequency radiation, as found in cell antennas, cell phones, "smart" meters, and wi-fi.
  • Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: These patients have an allergic-type reaction and/or a sensitivity to high frequency radiation, as found in cell antennas, cell phones, "smart" meters, and wi-fi.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110083138

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083138

Approximately 10% of my patients have a bad reaction to strong electromagnetic radiation fields. These patients have an allergic-type reaction and/or a sensitivity to high frequency radiation, as found in cell antennas, cell phones, "smart" meters, and wi-fi. A smaller percentage even react to lower frequency radiation as found in home wiring that was not properly installed and therefore gives off strong fields. There should be much stricter limits on what people can be exposed to. For instance, in schools and multi-tenant buildings, but even near single-family homes and businesses.

#428Attachment-only filingby Shanda Ezell » 2026-10-22
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110083136

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083136

Official documents · 2

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#429Attachment-only filingby Targeted Justice » 2026-10-22
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110083135

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083135

Official documents · 1

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#430Attachment-only filingby Reza Ganjavi » 2026-10-22
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110083133

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083133

Official documents · 11

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#431Attachment-only filingby Roger Cavnaugh » 2026-10-22
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110083132

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083132

Official documents · 5

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#432Here's a three minute video containing data that is published science, testing results, or public standar…by Clara Smith » 2026-10-22
AI summary & topic connections
  • E-Rate & school connectivity: When Xcel threatened us I was desperate to learn how to protect our live bodies.
  • Sensitivity & health experiences: https://www.facebook.com/reel/1748284186236212 In my home office I experienced disabling head pain, frightening heart palpitations, shortness of breath and brain fog leading to an inability to think.
  • Sleep & neurological concerns: https://www.facebook.com/reel/1748284186236212 In my home office I experienced disabling head pain, frightening heart palpitations, shortness of breath and brain fog leading to an inability to think.
  • Children, schools & development: I can't imagine the terror moms and dads have over their young children being constantly bombarded by man made radiation frequencies that disturb the young and old alike and do damage to the DNA level to every live member of mankind, animal kind and plant kind!
  • Biological mechanisms & metabolism: I can't imagine the terror moms and dads have over their young children being constantly bombarded by man made radiation frequencies that disturb the young and old alike and do damage to the DNA level to every live member of mankind, animal kind and plant kind!
  • Towers, antennas & siting: placing frequency devices DIRECTLY ON all the town's people's WATER TOWER!!!
  • Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: After spending nearly two years refusing Xcel Energy access to install a smart meter, Xcel and the Colorado Public Utilities Commission FORCED US TO INSTALL THE SMART METER, A RADIATION EMITTING DEVICE, or Xcel Energy would shut our electric power off.
  • Exposure limits & testing: Here's a three minute video containing data that is published science, testing results, or public standards including the serious detrimental effects of these over-powerful man-made radiation frequencies.
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: Constant research about radiation frequencies, including dirty electricity that's inherent in our power grid from 42% wind and solar power delivered to our house...

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110083131 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083131 Here's a three minute video containing data that is published science, testing results, or public standards including the serious detrimental effects of these over-powerful man-made radiation frequencies. Please watch it. https://www.facebook.com/reel/1748284186236212 In my home office I experienced disabling head pain, frightening heart palpitations, shortness of breath and brain fog leading to an inability to think. It took me AVOIDING my office to figure it out. After spending nearly two years refusing Xcel Energy access to install a smart meter, Xcel and the Colorado Public Utilities Commission FORCED US TO INSTALL THE SMART METER, A RADIATION EMITTING DEVICE, or Xcel Energy would shut our electric power off. When Xcel threatened us I was desperate to learn how to protect our live bodies. Constant research about radiation frequencies, including dirty electricity that's inherent in our power grid from 42% wind and solar power delivered to our house... I purchased SaticShield and Aulterra products to shield, filter and "retune" the POWERFUL man-made smart meter radiation and technology frequencies constituting interference with our natural live electrical bodies; including the wifi router, cell phones, laptop, desktop and big screen tv. We applied individual products to the technology devices, a whole house filter to our electrical lines and each of our automobiles. We wear the protection on our bodies as well. Finally the buzzing in my head reduced some and sleep was improved some. We shielded the FORCED UPON US smart meter from pulsing extremely heavy loads of radiation into our kitchen where we stand to cook and walk past EVERY DAY. What do people do that can't afford to mitigate the harmful health effects? Or those that don't know a silent killer is frequenting them every day practically all day and all night? I can't imagine the terror moms and dads have over their young children being constantly bombarded by man made radiation frequencies that disturb the young and old alike and do damage to the DNA level to every live member of mankind, animal kind and plant kind! Yes, the radiation frequencies…

Read the full comment →

#433Attachment-only filingby Christine M. Hoch » 2026-10-22
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110083129

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083129

Official documents · 1

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#434I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its dec…by Laura Ross » 2026-10-22
AI summary & topic connections
  • Sensitivity & health experiences: This issue matters to me personally because I experience intense physical symptoms when I am in areas with a lot of wi-fi signals and cellular phones.
  • Cancer & tumors: The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer.
  • Children, schools & development: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Wildlife & environment: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Exposure limits & testing: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
  • Court remand & agency accountability: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110083128

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083128

I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. I hope the FCC will fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. This issue matters to me personally because I experience intense physical symptoms when I am in areas with a lot of wi-fi signals and cellular phones. I get very dizzy, have intense ringing in my ears, headaches, nausea, and experience visual problems when I go into an airport, a large discount box store like Costco, or into a a building that has over 10 wi-fi signals from multiple apartments or offices. I've also had friends and co-workers who have ended up with cancerous tumors where they kept their cell phone on their body or against their ear i.e. a brain tumor behind the ear used with phone and cancer in the hip bone where a friend kept their phone hooked to their belt all the time. I urge the FCC to give meaningful consideration to the experiences and evidence before it and to fully address each of the issues identified by the court.

#435It is known that RF energy is dangerous when it heats tissue, so keeping exposure below the heating thres…by christina bertea » 2026-10-22
AI summary & topic connections
  • E-Rate & school connectivity: There is nothing inside my home that would generate an “alarm” waking me every night, so I have had to question other possible sources and smart meters are a likely suspect.
  • Sensitivity & health experiences: https://www.emfanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Naval-Medical-Research-Institute-2300-Studies-on-EMF-Health-Effects.pdf In this comment I will focus on my own individual personal experience related to symptoms listed in that bibliography such as sleep disturbance; lens of eye (cataractous lesions)/ lens opacity and coagulation; blood disorders; blood oxygen content resulting from EMF/RF exposure; hypertension.
  • Sleep & neurological concerns: https://www.emfanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Naval-Medical-Research-Institute-2300-Studies-on-EMF-Health-Effects.pdf In this comment I will focus on my own individual personal experience related to symptoms listed in that bibliography such as sleep disturbance; lens of eye (cataractous lesions)/ lens opacity and coagulation; blood disorders; blood oxygen content resulting from EMF/RF exposure; hypertension.
  • Towers, antennas & siting: As of then no cell towers had been erected nearby.
  • Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: SLEEP DISTURBANCE Some time after forced installation of smart meters on both my household electrical system and natural gas system, I began to notice a strange pattern.
  • Wired connections & alternatives: I don’t have wifi in my home, choosing to use ethernet connections instead to minimize EMF/RF exposure.
  • Exposure limits & testing: However, “The Federal Communications Commission’s safety exposure limits for wireless radiation are based on the assumption that the radiation can harm human health ONLY at levels high enough to heat human tissue.
  • Court remand & agency accountability: In 2021 I returned for another live blood cell analysis and my red blood cells were all clumped in Rouleaux Formation.
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: Yet a government funded review of 2300 studies done before 1971 found a plethora of biological effects.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110083127 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083127 It is known that RF energy is dangerous when it heats tissue, so keeping exposure below the heating threshold has been the “safety” goal since the 1990's. However, “The Federal Communications Commission’s safety exposure limits for wireless radiation are based on the assumption that the radiation can harm human health ONLY at levels high enough to heat human tissue. Cellphones emit radiation at levels lower than that.” https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/cellphone-radiation-abnormal-blood-cells-rouleaux-formation/? So an entire category of biological effects from RF energy has been denied consideration by the FCC. It is now imperative that the FCC fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning ALL possible types of health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation. Personally I have been dismayed that for many years the FCC has refused to update their decades old “safety standards” for RF exposure, clinging to “thermal effects” as the only possible harmful impact on living beings. Yet a government funded review of 2300 studies done before 1971 found a plethora of biological effects. https://www.emfanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Naval-Medical-Research-Institute-2300-Studies-on-EMF-Health-Effects.pdf In this comment I will focus on my own individual personal experience related to symptoms listed in that bibliography such as sleep disturbance; lens of eye (cataractous lesions)/ lens opacity and coagulation; blood disorders; blood oxygen content resulting from EMF/RF exposure; hypertension. SLEEP DISTURBANCE Some time after forced installation of smart meters on both my household electrical system and natural gas system, I began to notice a strange pattern. I would wake up from deep sleep at precisely the same time every night. (For a long while it was 4:14 am.) It mattered not what time I had gotten to bed nor how tired I had been, etc. Just a peculiar waking up at exactly the same moment every night, often with heart arrhythmia or racing heartbeat. And then having great difficulty getting back to sleep. This became very tiresome and took a serious toll on my health and…

Read the full comment →

#436Thank you for the opportunity to share the following information. The following research is helpful to un…by Marilyn R Wilson » 2026-10-22
AI summary & topic connections
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: The following research is helpful to understand the serious issues of over exposure to EMF that is well below the current threshold, and these thresholds need to be revised based on all relevant research.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110083126

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083126

Thank you for the opportunity to share the following information. The following research is helpful to understand the serious issues of over exposure to EMF that is well below the current threshold, and these thresholds need to be revised based on all relevant research. Research includes: The Bio Initiative Report, The CRC Handbook on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields written by Charles Polk, University of Rhode Island, The NIEHS EMF Rapid Program. More current research includes materials from the research by Magda Havas, PhD. Trent University All the authors within the Bio Initiative Report are relevant. Some of those being; Henry Lai, PhD, "Evidence for Genotoxic Effects (RFR and ELF Genotoxicity)", Martin Blank, PhD. Columbia University, "Evidence for Stress Response Health Risk of EMF", Olle Johansson, PhD Karolinska Institute Stockholm, Sweden. These are just a few of the researchers/ materials that I have studied based on my own severe health issues that were caused from over exposure to EMF from a wiring error of the Madison Gas and Electric Company near my home in Madison, Wisconsin. The over exposure (unknowingly over exposed from 1994- 2001) in all seriousness this over exposure ruined my health. Thank you for being brave and taking this highly politized issue on. Best to all of you in your much needed work. Marilyn Wilson

#437Attachment-only filingby Dawn Kardasz » 2026-10-22
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110083125

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083125

Official documents · 1

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#438My comments are simple The FCC is in breech of trust to do its work ensuring the safety of the technology…by COURTLANDT JENNINGS, Courtlandt Jennings » 2026-10-22
AI summary & topic connections
  • Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: (2021) BioInitiative Report (2012, with Subsequent Research Updates) I think it pretty obvious that very measurable harms will found from exposure to cell phones, smart appliaances, wifi, and most of the other RF waves that are bouncing around.
  • Court remand & agency accountability: The courts have ordered you do something, like how about doing some reviews of all the peer reviewed studies already existing since your last review WAY BACK in 1996?
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: The courts have ordered you do something, like how about doing some reviews of all the peer reviewed studies already existing since your last review WAY BACK in 1996?

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110083124

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083124

My comments are simple The FCC is in breech of trust to do its work ensuring the safety of the technology you allow in our homes. The courts have ordered you do something, like how about doing some reviews of all the peer reviewed studies already existing since your last review WAY BACK in 1996? That is 30 years ago here are some studies : Levitt, Lai & Manville (2021) Panagopoulos et al. (2021) BioInitiative Report (2012, with Subsequent Research Updates) I think it pretty obvious that very measurable harms will found from exposure to cell phones, smart appliaances, wifi, and most of the other RF waves that are bouncing around. Please do the dillegence expected of a Federal Agency and do a proper review and make some serious changes to the technology you are allowing into our lives. There are better ways, better frequencies etc to use than what is being used today. Thank you

#439Please, please take care of our people, especially our children and grandchildren!! Putin said he doesn't…by Jana Baughman » 2026-10-22
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110083122

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083122

Please, please take care of our people, especially our children and grandchildren!! Putin said he doesn't have to worry about the USA because they are killing themselves! You can review, rethink, and adjust the safety guidelines! Its unbelievable that they haven't been reassessed since 1996!! We need good science, not from the source! It CAN NOT just be about the MONEY!! Our nation is at risk!! There is so much involuntary exposure! There are thousands of studies proving biological impact on humans and our animal friends! UGH!! There is "safe technology" ! Please make this a priority. Thank you, Jana Baughman

#440I feel that exposure levels do not reflect what we now know about biological effects of EMF, that they ar…by Kathleen Sundmark » 2026-10-22
AI summary & topic connections
  • Sensitivity & health experiences: I have friends who get headaches, tinnitus, brain fog, fatigue and body pain around dense EMF sources, including newer vehicles.
  • Sleep & neurological concerns: I have friends who get headaches, tinnitus, brain fog, fatigue and body pain around dense EMF sources, including newer vehicles.
  • Children, schools & development: Please consider studies that have been performed on the effects of these high fields on all species, and especially humans and especially vulnerable people and children.
  • Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: I experience heart rate increases near WiFi and bluetooth, but I am unable to avoid it while moving about my daily life.
  • Exposure limits & testing: Please downwardly adjust recommended exposure levels to reduce non-thermal effects to biolotical systems.
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: Please consider the quality research that has been done over the decades on microwave exposures, radiofrequency exposures, electrical fields, magnetic fields, dirty electricity, and combinations.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110083121

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083121

I feel that exposure levels do not reflect what we now know about biological effects of EMF, that they are too high and need to be lowered and regulated. I experience heart rate increases near WiFi and bluetooth, but I am unable to avoid it while moving about my daily life. I have friends who get headaches, tinnitus, brain fog, fatigue and body pain around dense EMF sources, including newer vehicles. I know people who must avoid places, whether business or personal, because the EMF fields are dense and debilitating. Because so few people have been educated/warned about proper use of EMF emitting devices, and telecom companies have penetrated into our communities with poor oversight over their support infrastructure, many of us have symptoms without knowing why. Physicians are not trained to suspect EMF exposures as factors in many illnesses. Please consider the quality research that has been done over the decades on microwave exposures, radiofrequency exposures, electrical fields, magnetic fields, dirty electricity, and combinations. Please consider studies that have been performed on the effects of these high fields on all species, and especially humans and especially vulnerable people and children. Please downwardly adjust recommended exposure levels to reduce non-thermal effects to biolotical systems. Thank you.