Approximately 10% of my patients have a bad reaction to strong electromagnetic radiation fields. These pa…

FCC public comment #26110083138 · ET Docket 13-84 · 2026-10-22

#1Approximately 10% of my patients have a bad reaction to strong electromagnetic radiation fields. These pa…by Dr. John Ruhland, John Ruhland » 2026-10-22
AI summary & topic connections
  • Children, schools & development: For instance, in schools and multi-tenant buildings, but even near single-family homes and businesses.
  • Towers, antennas & siting: These patients have an allergic-type reaction and/or a sensitivity to high frequency radiation, as found in cell antennas, cell phones, "smart" meters, and wi-fi.
  • Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: These patients have an allergic-type reaction and/or a sensitivity to high frequency radiation, as found in cell antennas, cell phones, "smart" meters, and wi-fi.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110083138

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083138

Approximately 10% of my patients have a bad reaction to strong electromagnetic radiation fields. These patients have an allergic-type reaction and/or a sensitivity to high frequency radiation, as found in cell antennas, cell phones, "smart" meters, and wi-fi. A smaller percentage even react to lower frequency radiation as found in home wiring that was not properly installed and therefore gives off strong fields. There should be much stricter limits on what people can be exposed to. For instance, in schools and multi-tenant buildings, but even near single-family homes and businesses.

Share this public comment

Share guide: link to the comment page, quote the commenter's own words, and point people to the official docket to file their own comment.

Discuss this comment

Replies are reviewed before they appear. This is a community discussion, not an official FCC filing.

Replies