AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110077076
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077076
All FCC comments · page 121
2,415 public comments, newest first, 20 per page. Keep scrolling to load more.
AI summary & topic connections
- Sensitivity & health experiences:
Computet Hot spots, etc effects my health, causing ringing in ears, headaches, dizziness, etc.
- Children, schools & development:
It effects people who are sensitive to EMFs & especially kids.
- Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices:
EMF such as comes from smart meters.
- Wildlife & environment:
We need to stop all these untested data centers that are harming people, animals & environment.
- Exposure limits & testing:
We need testing & regulations.
Original comment · unedited text
26110077075
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077075
EMF such as comes from smart meters. Computet Hot spots, etc effects my health, causing ringing in ears, headaches, dizziness, etc. It effects people who are sensitive to EMFs & especially kids. We need testing & regulations. We need to stop all these untested data centers that are harming people, animals & environment.
AI summary & topic connections
- Cancer & tumors:
The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer.
- Children, schools & development:
Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
- Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices:
Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
- Wildlife & environment:
Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
- Exposure limits & testing:
Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
- Court remand & agency accountability:
Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
- Research, evidence & monitoring:
Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
Original comment · unedited text
26110077074
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077074
I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court.
AI summary & topic connections
- Cancer & tumors:
The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer.
- Children, schools & development:
Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
- Towers, antennas & siting:
This issue matters to me personally because I have small children and new towers go up around our house all the time.
- Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices:
Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
- Wildlife & environment:
Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
- Exposure limits & testing:
Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
- Court remand & agency accountability:
Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
- Research, evidence & monitoring:
Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
Original comment · unedited text
26110077073
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077073
I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. This issue matters to me personally because I have small children and new towers go up around our house all the time. There is no escape and I worry about the long term effects of the constant exposure. The laws and research have not caught up and we are being exposed 24/7 without being fully aware of the consequences. I urge the FCC to give meaningful consideration to the experiences and evidence before it and to fully address each of the issues identified by the court.
AI summary & topic connections
- Sensitivity & health experiences:
headaches- nausea- dizzy- ear ringing- weakened immunity- irritable- mood disorder after prolonged use- fatigue- restlessness- and a plethora of other isues-brain damage- it must come to and end- phones need a red box warning- like we do for cigarettes- and prescription meds- kids brains are being fried- concentration is non existent- test scores are low- its a huge distraction.
- Sleep & neurological concerns:
headaches- nausea- dizzy- ear ringing- weakened immunity- irritable- mood disorder after prolonged use- fatigue- restlessness- and a plethora of other isues-brain damage- it must come to and end- phones need a red box warning- like we do for cigarettes- and prescription meds- kids brains are being fried- concentration is non existent- test scores are low- its a huge distraction.
- Children, schools & development:
headaches- nausea- dizzy- ear ringing- weakened immunity- irritable- mood disorder after prolonged use- fatigue- restlessness- and a plethora of other isues-brain damage- it must come to and end- phones need a red box warning- like we do for cigarettes- and prescription meds- kids brains are being fried- concentration is non existent- test scores are low- its a huge distraction.
- Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices:
headaches- nausea- dizzy- ear ringing- weakened immunity- irritable- mood disorder after prolonged use- fatigue- restlessness- and a plethora of other isues-brain damage- it must come to and end- phones need a red box warning- like we do for cigarettes- and prescription meds- kids brains are being fried- concentration is non existent- test scores are low- its a huge distraction.
Original comment · unedited text
26110077072
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077072
headaches- nausea- dizzy- ear ringing- weakened immunity- irritable- mood disorder after prolonged use- fatigue- restlessness- and a plethora of other isues-brain damage- it must come to and end- phones need a red box warning- like we do for cigarettes- and prescription meds- kids brains are being fried- concentration is non existent- test scores are low- its a huge distraction. plus the EMF,s are so bad for you. it poses a serious health risk.
AI summary & topic connections
- Cancer & tumors:
The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer.
- Children, schools & development:
Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
- Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices:
Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
- Wildlife & environment:
Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
- Exposure limits & testing:
Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
- Court remand & agency accountability:
Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
- Research, evidence & monitoring:
Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
Original comment · unedited text
26110077071
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077071
I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. This issue matters to me personally because: The rwdiation have been proven to be harmful to humanity, including but not limited to, biological and biochemical dysregulation. We the people have not voted on this and do not support this harm being positioned on our communities. I urge the FCC to give meaningful consideration to the experiences and evidence before it and to fully address each of the issues identified by the court.
AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110077070
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077070
EMF is dangerous and there is not enough public education about it horrible impacts on the human biology.
AI summary & topic connections
- Sleep & neurological concerns:
This issue matters to me personally because: I have recently experienced anxiety and insomnia I feel they are directly related
- Cancer & tumors:
The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer.
- Children, schools & development:
Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
- Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices:
Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
- Wildlife & environment:
Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
- Exposure limits & testing:
Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
- Court remand & agency accountability:
Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
- Research, evidence & monitoring:
Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
Original comment · unedited text
26110077068
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077068
I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. This issue matters to me personally because: I have recently experienced anxiety and insomnia I feel they are directly related
AI summary & topic connections
- E-Rate & school connectivity:
Our 15 non-profit schools grealy need the e-rate program for our internet and technological needs.
- Children, schools & development:
Our 15 non-profit schools grealy need the e-rate program for our internet and technological needs.
Original comment · unedited text
26110076866
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110076866
Our 15 non-profit schools grealy need the e-rate program for our internet and technological needs. We have relied on it since e-rate's inception. Please continue the program for the benefit of all of our students.
AI summary & topic connections
- E-Rate & school connectivity:
Marlene Dortch: We are writing regarding the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on the E-Rate program, and we appreciate the opportunity to comment ahead of the October 13, 2026 deadline, asking the FCC to preserve the current E-Rate program.
- Children, schools & development:
Our students have reliable internet access at our school because of E-Rate.
- Research, evidence & monitoring:
We also urge the FCC not to impose overly restrictive mandates or administrative burdens, particularly around screen use and content-monitoring requirements proposed in this proceeding, as they will undermine the flexibility schools need to deliver high-quality, digital learning.
Original comment · unedited text
26110076825 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110076825 Dear Ms. Marlene Dortch: We are writing regarding the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on the E-Rate program, and we appreciate the opportunity to comment ahead of the October 13, 2026 deadline, asking the FCC to preserve the current E-Rate program. Our students have reliable internet access at our school because of E-Rate. Without E-Rate funding, we would have to cut core services, programs, and operations to maintain the internet service our school requires. High-speed, reliable internet is central to daily learning at our school. We are concerned by proposals in this proceeding that would narrow the program's scope, including reducing support for schools in less-resourced communities, eliminating funding for certain special construction projects, or ending E-Rate eligibility for early childhood programs. Losing E-Rate support would severely impact our entire school budget, forcing difficult choices between funding essential technology and supporting other critical educational programs. Sixty percent of our internet budget is paid for through E-Rate, and we save several dollars on other technology. We are also concerned about proposed administrative changes that would add significant new burdens on schools without a clear corresponding benefit to students. Eliminating the "Kalamazoo exception" would require schools like ours to re-bid and re-sign existing, already competitively bid contracts more frequently, adding staff time and creating potential service gaps. As a small private school without dedicated E-Rate compliance staff, this change would fall disproportionately hard on us compared to larger districts with dedicated procurement teams. Similarly, requiring a new annual consultant disclosure form (Form 5654) from every applicant, even schools that do not use a consultant, adds a filing requirement with no clear purpose for schools that manage their own applications. E-Rate is an essential program, and we ask for the FCC's continued commitment to ensuring that schools across the nation have access to the federal funds…
AI summary & topic connections
- E-Rate & school connectivity:
Those processes operate well below heating thresholds.
- Cancer & tumors:
It ordered a reasoned explanation of how those guidelines protect against harmful effects unrelated to cancer, including impacts on children, long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices, device-testing procedures, and the environment.
- Children, schools & development:
It ordered a reasoned explanation of how those guidelines protect against harmful effects unrelated to cancer, including impacts on children, long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices, device-testing procedures, and the environment.
- Pregnancy & reproduction:
Health 25:42, 2026, doi:10.1186/s12940-026-01288-6), using EPA-style methods on experimental-animal data, estimate that the FCC/ICNIRP whole-body public limit of 80 mW/kg is 15- to 900-fold above modeled 1×10⁻⁵ cancer-risk levels depending on daily duration, and 8- to 24-fold above male-reproductive reference levels (3.3–10 mW/kg).
- Biological mechanisms & metabolism:
They do not independently evaluate non-thermal disruption of ion-channel gating, calcium waveform signaling, or mitochondrial redox.
- Towers, antennas & siting:
My ability to travel freely throughout my neihborhood and community is severely curtailed due the ever increasing levels of EMF from cell towers, SMART meters, wifi and other sources of non natural frequencies.
- Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices:
My ability to travel freely throughout my neihborhood and community is severely curtailed due the ever increasing levels of EMF from cell towers, SMART meters, wifi and other sources of non natural frequencies.
- Wildlife & environment:
It ordered a reasoned explanation of how those guidelines protect against harmful effects unrelated to cancer, including impacts on children, long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices, device-testing procedures, and the environment.
- Exposure limits & testing:
The court remanded the 2019 decision to keep the 1996 RF exposure guidelines.
- Court remand & agency accountability:
Court of Appeals for the D.C.
- Research, evidence & monitoring:
It ordered a reasoned explanation of how those guidelines protect against harmful effects unrelated to cancer, including impacts on children, long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices, device-testing procedures, and the environment.
Original comment · unedited text
26110076821 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110076821 Comments of Rosemarie Russell ET Docket No. 13-84 (Public Notice DA 26-971) I am a resident in Hurricane, UT. I file this comment so the Commission will complete the work the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit required in Environmental Health Trust v. FCC, 9 F.4th 893 (D.C. Cir. 2021). I live with nearby wireless infrastructure, so this is not an abstract proceeding. It is the air around my home. I am filing because I have EMR Syndrome. My ability to travel freely throughout my neihborhood and community is severely curtailed due the ever increasing levels of EMF from cell towers, SMART meters, wifi and other sources of non natural frequencies. The court remanded the 2019 decision to keep the 1996 RF exposure guidelines. It ordered a reasoned explanation of how those guidelines protect against harmful effects unrelated to cancer, including impacts on children, long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices, device-testing procedures, and the environment. The mandate issued October 5, 2021. The 1996 limits remain in force. The remand is not closed. A new comment cycle is not a substitute for a Commission-level answer. Current FCC limits are thermal-only. They were derived from short-duration animal studies and are designed to prevent tissue heating. They do not independently evaluate non-thermal disruption of ion-channel gating, calcium waveform signaling, or mitochondrial redox. Those processes operate well below heating thresholds. A guideline that treats average power deposition as a complete proxy for harm is inadequate as a public-health standard. Melnick and Moskowitz (Environ. Health 25:42, 2026, doi:10.1186/s12940-026-01288-6), using EPA-style methods on experimental-animal data, estimate that the FCC/ICNIRP whole-body public limit of 80 mW/kg is 15- to 900-fold above modeled 1×10⁻⁵ cancer-risk levels depending on daily duration, and 8- to 24-fold above male-reproductive reference levels (3.3–10 mW/kg). These are whole-body SAR comparisons, not localized phone ratings. The Commission should state which assumptions it accepts or rejects. NTP TR-595 (2018) reported clear evidence of…
AI summary & topic connections
- E-Rate & school connectivity:
I am writing on behalf of Notre Dame de la Baie Academy, a private 9–12 high school in Green Bay, Wisconsin, to express our strong support for the continuation of E-Rate funding.
- Children, schools & development:
I am writing on behalf of Notre Dame de la Baie Academy, a private 9–12 high school in Green Bay, Wisconsin, to express our strong support for the continuation of E-Rate funding.
Original comment · unedited text
26110076817
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110076817
I am writing on behalf of Notre Dame de la Baie Academy, a private 9–12 high school in Green Bay, Wisconsin, to express our strong support for the continuation of E-Rate funding. Our school relies on E-Rate support to maintain essential internet access and our internal network throughout our school. In recent years, we have seen a rise in the number of students qualifying for free and reduced lunch. As our traditional fundraising capacity is limited, E-Rate funding is vital to enhancing our internal connectivity for our students and ensuring equal access to resources. Reliable, high-speed connectivity is essential for preparing our students for higher education and/or the workforce. Without E-Rate support, our limited operating budget would force us to delay critical network equipment upgrades, resulting in aging infrastructure. This would directly impact daily learning and teaching. Also, absorbing these connectivity costs would force us to make difficult cuts to other educational programs that we've spent so much time and energy to build. We implemented an A/V Studio class in the last 5 years where students are video streamed to our classrooms via Vimeo each morning with our daily announcements. The class allows our students to learn about media, on-air presence, directing, controls for video and sound as well as writing script. Without funding for our internet connectivity, this class would struggle or need to be revamped and the bandwidth to stream would likely be in jeopardy. On behalf of our students, faculty, and school community, I respectfully urge the FCC to maintain current E-Rate funding levels. This support remains essential to helping us provide a solid education for our students.
AI summary & topic connections
- E-Rate & school connectivity:
Marlene Dortch: We are writing regarding the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on the E-Rate program, and we appreciate the opportunity to comment ahead of the October 13, 2026 deadline, asking FCC to preserve the current E-rate program.
- Children, schools & development:
Our students have reliable internet access at our school because of E-Rate.
- Research, evidence & monitoring:
We also urge the FCC not to impose overly restrictive mandates or administrative burdens, particularly around screenuse and content-monitoring requirements proposed in this proceeding, as they will undermine the flexibility schools need to deliver high-quality, digital learning.
Original comment · unedited text
26110076779 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110076779 Dear Ms. Marlene Dortch: We are writing regarding the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on the E-Rate program, and we appreciate the opportunity to comment ahead of the October 13, 2026 deadline, asking FCC to preserve the current E-rate program. Our students have reliable internet access at our school because of E-Rate. Without E-Rate funding, we would have to cut core services, programs, and operations to maintain the internet service our school requires. High-speed, reliable internet is at the heart of daily learning in our school. We are concerned by proposals in this proceeding that would narrow the program's scope, including reducing support for schools in less-resourced communities, eliminating funding for certain special construction projects, or ending E-Rate eligibility for early childhood programs. Losing E-Rate support would severely impact our entire school budget, forcing difficult choices between funding essential technology and supporting other critical educational programs. We are also concerned about proposed administrative changes that would add significant new burdens on schools without a clear corresponding benefit to students. Eliminating the "Kalamazoo exception" would require schools like ours to re-bid and re-sign existing, already competitively bid contracts more frequently, adding staff time and creating potential service gaps. As a small private school without dedicated E-Rate compliance staff, this change would fall disproportionately hard on us compared to larger districts with dedicated procurement teams. Similarly, requiring a new annual consultant disclosure form (Form 5654) from every applicant, even schools that do not use a consultant, adds a filing requirement with no clear purpose for schools that manage their own applications. E-Rate is an essential program, and we ask for the FCC's continued commitment to ensuring that schools across the nation have access to the federal funds needed to provide secure, scalable, futureready connectivity that supports the current and evolving needs of our…
AI summary & topic connections
- Cancer & tumors:
Autism, brain tumors, endocrine diseases, etc.,have gone up on the same vector as cell phone use, towers, nnEMF.
- Children, schools & development:
Our children deserve to live and learn in a safe environment.
- Biological mechanisms & metabolism:
Autism, brain tumors, endocrine diseases, etc.,have gone up on the same vector as cell phone use, towers, nnEMF.
- Disability, access & daily life:
It is imperative that we create EMF free zones so that those who have this disability can live.
- Towers, antennas & siting:
Autism, brain tumors, endocrine diseases, etc.,have gone up on the same vector as cell phone use, towers, nnEMF.
- Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices:
Autism, brain tumors, endocrine diseases, etc.,have gone up on the same vector as cell phone use, towers, nnEMF.
- Wildlife & environment:
Our children deserve to live and learn in a safe environment.
- Research, evidence & monitoring:
The studies on nnEMF are clear.
Original comment · unedited text
26110076526
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110076526
The United States Government has a primary duty to protect it's citizens. Our children deserve to live and learn in a safe environment. The studies on nnEMF are clear. Extra noise in a lab or a body creates quantum decoherence. Decoherence creates disease or a ruined experiment. This is especially true in kids and the elderly. It is imperative that we create EMF free zones so that those who have this disability can live. The public must be informed. Autism, brain tumors, endocrine diseases, etc.,have gone up on the same vector as cell phone use, towers, nnEMF. Unseen microwave destroys how the mitochondria communicate. This evidence is irrefutable. We can now change how society views this invisible threat. Create legislation to make it mandatory to inform the public. Save our most vulnerable, our future, our kids.
AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110076475
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110076475
Official documents · 18
- Wireless Technologies and the Risk of Adverse Health Effects in Society- A Retrospective Ethical Risk Analysis of Health and Safety Guidelines 2021 Tom Butler.pdf ↗
- CRITICISM OF THE HEALTH ASSESSMENT IN THE ICNIRP GUIDELINES FOR RADIOFREQUENCY AND MICROWAVE RADIATION (100 kHz - 300 GHz) Dr. Neil Cherry.pdf ↗
- An Opinion of the Trustworthiness of and Unscientific Bias in the ICNIRP Guidelines 2020 Dr. Butler .pdf ↗
- Chronic paternal Wi-Fi RF-EMR exposure impairs placental efficiency and fetal growth- Association with sex-dependent histone modification patterns in mice.pdf ↗
- Effects of 5G frequencies on sperm parameters, mating success, and offspring outcomes in rats copy.pdf ↗
- Shielding the First 24 Postnatal Months of Life- A Proposal for a Prospective Cohort Study of Early-Life Electromagnetic Exposure and Autism Risk.pdf ↗
- Real-World Assessment of RF-EMF Exposure From 3G, 4G, and 5G Mobile Networks Across Different Urbanization Levels.pdf ↗
- EM Radiation Thermal Effects Simulation Study on a Realistic Female Model at Some Frequencies .pdf ↗
- Panagopoulos et al 2026-Response to comments by Foster et al.Recording the Extremely Low Frequency Pulsations of Wireless Communication Electromagnetic Fields pdf.pdf ↗
- Recording the ELF pulsations of wireless communication EMF by Panagopoulos et al 2026 .pdf ↗
- Environmental and auto-induced RF-EMF adult and children far-field exposure simulations between 450 MHz and 26 GHz.pdf ↗
- Mobile Telecommunications and Health Summary of the ECOLOG study for T-Mobile, 2000 .pdf ↗
- Robert_C_Kane Cellular Telephone Russian Roulette.pdf ↗
- Effects of 5G frequencies on sperm parameters, mating success, and offspring outcomes in rats.pdf ↗
- Early-life exposure to 27.5 GHz 5G millimeter-wave radiation induces skin-related biological responses in mice.pdf ↗
- Electromagnetic field distribution in high power wireless EV charging systems under coil misalignment.pdf ↗
- impact of EMF field exposure on reproductive health unmbrella review and meta analysis of systematic reviews Lomzouri 2025.pdf ↗
- ICBE-EMF Child Health Cell Phone Cell Tower EMF Position Statement 9:8:2026.pdf ↗
Loading more comments…