All FCC comments · page 20

• Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• E-Rate & school connectivity: With our current uptick in maladies such as cancers of all kinds, infertility, neuro-degeneration, Cardiovascular Disease, ASD, Hoshimoto’s Thyroiditis, Type 2 Diabetes, and more, we should be asking why this is happening exponentially as we increase the rate of our wireless radiation exposures.
• Sensitivity & health experiences: Since then it is impossible for me to leave my home without suffering from symptoms of migraine, vertigo, latent sleep disorder, and even at times seizures.
• Sleep & neurological concerns: Since then it is impossible for me to leave my home without suffering from symptoms of migraine, vertigo, latent sleep disorder, and even at times seizures.
• Children, schools & development: If I am so affected by these frequencies, what might they be doing to the developing child’s brains or to our pets and wildlife?
• Pregnancy & reproduction: With our current uptick in maladies such as cancers of all kinds, infertility, neuro-degeneration, Cardiovascular Disease, ASD, Hoshimoto’s Thyroiditis, Type 2 Diabetes, and more, we should be asking why this is happening exponentially as we increase the rate of our wireless radiation exposures.
• Biological mechanisms & metabolism: After deep diving into published research, it is clear that the literature shows wireless technologies are neuro-toxic to biology via neurotransmitter changes and Voltage Gated Calcium Channel dysfunction.
• Towers, antennas & siting: That cell phone towers, power stations, and other facilities or antenna that emit ELF, EMF, or RF be required to be positioned a mile or more away from buildings, public spaces, and areas of residence OR require informed consent from all potentially affected parties as to the exposures and their unknown possible effects.
• Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: Thankfully I can function on my own property without wi-fi as I was able to switch to wired internet.
• Wired connections & alternatives: Thankfully I can function on my own property without wi-fi as I was able to switch to wired internet.
• Wildlife & environment: If I am so affected by these frequencies, what might they be doing to the developing child’s brains or to our pets and wildlife?
• Exposure limits & testing: Focusing on the thermal effects of non-ionizing radiation does not suffice in assuring the public you are required to protect that these technologies are safe.
• Research, evidence & monitoring: After deep diving into published research, it is clear that the literature shows wireless technologies are neuro-toxic to biology via neurotransmitter changes and Voltage Gated Calcium Channel dysfunction.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• E-Rate & school connectivity: My firm is one of the very few law firms which primarily represents the interests of residents of communities where wireless carriers are seeking permits to install and operate personal wireless communications infrastructure.
• Cancer & tumors: The panel eviscerated the FCC for its utter lack of reasoned decision-making on all the significant health and environmental issues raised, except for cancer, which the panel found that the FCC at least set forth a reasoned basis – without opining on the merits of the FCC’s reasoning.
• Children, schools & development: I graduated from the University of Chicago Law School and the University of Chicago Graduate School of Business, receiving my JD and MBA degrees in 1983.
• Biological mechanisms & metabolism: While the exact etiology has not definitively been determined for all diseases and negative health impacts, persistent wireless radiation exposure appears to lead to oxidative stress which is well known to precipitate a cascade of negative human health conditions.
• Towers, antennas & siting: The 1996 FCC guidelines were issued in a rush at the dawn of the wireless age when hardly any cell phones, no less a plethora of wireless devices, existed, and the number of cell towers and other wireless communications facilities around the country were minimal.
• Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: The 1996 FCC guidelines were issued in a rush at the dawn of the wireless age when hardly any cell phones, no less a plethora of wireless devices, existed, and the number of cell towers and other wireless communications facilities around the country were minimal.
• Wildlife & environment: Similarly, serious scientific studies of the impact of wireless radiation exposure on flora and fauna are ongoing, and already numerous studies show negative impacts on birds, bats, bees, and flora.
• Exposure limits & testing: Petitioners filed for writ of mandamus after the FCC contemptuously ignored for 4 ½ years the mandate from the DC Circuit to reconsider most of the FCC’s unreasoned and arbitrary 2019 ruling refusing to conduct a rule-making procedure to update its 1996 RF exposure guidelines.
• Court remand & agency accountability: CIRCUIT REMAND IN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH TRUST V.
• Research, evidence & monitoring: Jeffrey Shuren that scientific studies do not show health risks from exposure to low level RF radiation.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Cancer & tumors: The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer.
• Children, schools & development: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
• Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
• Wildlife & environment: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
• Exposure limits & testing: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
• Court remand & agency accountability: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
• Research, evidence & monitoring: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• E-Rate & school connectivity: As parents, we were desperate to understand what was happening to our daughter and to find answers that would allow her to live a normal, healthy life.
• Sensitivity & health experiences: The timing of these symptoms and the profound impact they have had on her life have left our family deeply concerned about the possible relationship between her health and her exposure to RF radiation.
• Sleep & neurological concerns: We pursued extensive medical care, including multiple appointments with specialists in cardiology, neurology, and other practitioners, including neurological chiropractors.
• Cancer & tumors: The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer.
• Children, schools & development: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
• Disability, access & daily life: My daughter is now 34 years old and remains unable to work outside the home.
• Towers, antennas & siting: This issue matters to me personally because: I am writing to express my deep concern about the potential health effects of radiofrequency (RF) radiation from cell towers and to ask that the FCC take a more serious, proactive role in investigating the experiences of individuals and families who believe their health has been affected by exposure to these emissions.
• Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
• Wildlife & environment: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
• Exposure limits & testing: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
• Court remand & agency accountability: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
• Research, evidence & monitoring: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Children, schools & development: As a mother I advocate for safer tech habits, including using speakerphone and wired headphones, keeping wireless devices away from one self and my children's bodies when practical, turning Wi-fi off when not in use and utilizing direct hard wire connection when feasible.
• Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: As a mother I advocate for safer tech habits, including using speakerphone and wired headphones, keeping wireless devices away from one self and my children's bodies when practical, turning Wi-fi off when not in use and utilizing direct hard wire connection when feasible.
• Wired connections & alternatives: As a mother I advocate for safer tech habits, including using speakerphone and wired headphones, keeping wireless devices away from one self and my children's bodies when practical, turning Wi-fi off when not in use and utilizing direct hard wire connection when feasible.
• Research, evidence & monitoring: Therefore I believe there should be more regulations and studies to limit this radio frequency exposure, mothers should not have to choose between benefits of modernized tech and the health of ones family.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Sensitivity & health experiences: Also please understand that I started experiencing symptoms years before I understood about RF-EMR or was introduced to the idea of being EHS (Electro Hypersensitive) so my symptoms are NOT psychosomatic.
• Cancer & tumors: The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer.
• Children, schools & development: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
• Disability, access & daily life: With increasing ubiquitous levels of environmental RF-EMR in the town where I live, I have now become quite isolated.
• Towers, antennas & siting: My health went into, what I would describe, chronic RF-EMR sensitivity, when I started to make regular car journeys through a large town with 4G and 5G masts in 2022.
• Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
• Wired connections & alternatives: Interestingly the engineer installing the computer knew exactly what I was experiencing and wired the computer via ethernet immediately.
• Wildlife & environment: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
• Exposure limits & testing: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
• Court remand & agency accountability: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
• Research, evidence & monitoring: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Sleep & neurological concerns: The science now shows neurotoxicity, ADD/ADHD, seizures, cancer, infertility and more!
• Cancer & tumors: The science now shows neurotoxicity, ADD/ADHD, seizures, cancer, infertility and more!
• Children, schools & development: The science now shows neurotoxicity, ADD/ADHD, seizures, cancer, infertility and more!
• Pregnancy & reproduction: The science now shows neurotoxicity, ADD/ADHD, seizures, cancer, infertility and more!
• Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: I offered to read or phone in the monthly meter readings but PSE&G refuses to remove the extra charge.
• Exposure limits & testing: In 1996 the telecom industry got a law passed to bring toxic wireless radiation to market with no safety testing, and no accountability for harm.
• Court remand & agency accountability: In 1996 the telecom industry got a law passed to bring toxic wireless radiation to market with no safety testing, and no accountability for harm.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.