RF Safe

All FCC comments · page 115

2,415 public comments, newest first, 20 per page. Keep scrolling to load more.

#2281I personally have been damaged by smartmeters, cell towers, cell phones. I had to move out of my family h…by Debbie patrick » 2026-09-21
Towers, antennas & sitingWi-Fi, meters & wireless devicesCourt remand & agency accountabilityResearch, evidence & monitoring
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077208

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077208

I personally have been damaged by smartmeters, cell towers, cell phones. I had to move out of my family home to get over serious diseases....multiple times....including Covid. No one should be driven out of their home to regain their health. It is scientifically proven to suppress the immune system.... Stop ignoring the human and animals studies!!! Are we to conclude that these tech companies are running the FCC???? YOU ARE OUR FIRST LINE OF PROTECTION! PLEASE HELP THE AMERICAN PEOPLE! THANK YOU.

#2282I am submitting these comments to the FCC to review the impacts of RF radiation from cell towers, and oth…by inez garcia » 2026-09-21
Sensitivity & health experiencesChildren, schools & developmentTowers, antennas & sitingWildlife & environmentResearch, evidence & monitoring
AI summary & topic connections
  • Sensitivity & health experiences: I have experienced sudden unusual headaches while driving in areas, without prior cause.
  • Children, schools & development: Children, pets, farm animals, wildlife must be impacted...I'm sure I can't be the only person feeling sensitive to this "bombardment" of frequencies.
  • Towers, antennas & siting: I am submitting these comments to the FCC to review the impacts of RF radiation from cell towers, and other public sources.
  • Wildlife & environment: I have waited years for a proper review of health and environmental concerns that impact humans, wildlife and the environment; this is of utmost importance to be done by experts in the those fields, scientific, biological and otherwise related.
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: I have waited years for a proper review of health and environmental concerns that impact humans, wildlife and the environment; this is of utmost importance to be done by experts in the those fields, scientific, biological and otherwise related.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077207

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077207

I am submitting these comments to the FCC to review the impacts of RF radiation from cell towers, and other public sources. I have waited years for a proper review of health and environmental concerns that impact humans, wildlife and the environment; this is of utmost importance to be done by experts in the those fields, scientific, biological and otherwise related. With satellites, cell towers, and other manmade objects being sent up into the ionosphere, how could there not be an over bombardment of frequencies on all of us? I have experienced sudden unusual headaches while driving in areas, without prior cause. At times these areas are the same again and again with the onset of headaches. Children, pets, farm animals, wildlife must be impacted...I'm sure I can't be the only person feeling sensitive to this "bombardment" of frequencies. Please conduct a PROPER and THOROUGH STUDY to come to a conclusive determination of the application of these devices!

#2283am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decad…by Pip P Reynolds » 2026-09-21
Cancer & tumorsChildren, schools & developmentTowers, antennas & sitingWi-Fi, meters & wireless devicesWildlife & environmentExposure limits & testingCourt remand & agency accountabilityResearch, evidence & monitoring
AI summary & topic connections
  • Cancer & tumors: The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer.
  • Children, schools & development: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Towers, antennas & siting: Because they had 5G and WiFi at his school he was forced to drop out.
  • Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Wildlife & environment: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Exposure limits & testing: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
  • Court remand & agency accountability: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077206

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077206

am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. This issue matters to me personally because: It gave my son a heart condition. Because they had 5G and WiFi at his school he was forced to drop out. And he is limited where he can go. And I know of other people and children who are suffering with the same problem and worse.

#2284Here's a published, peer-reviewed research article on the effects of wireless radiation: "Effect of radio…by Noel A Taylor DC » 2026-09-21
Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devicesResearch, evidence & monitoring
AI summary & topic connections
  • Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: Here's a published, peer-reviewed research article on the effects of wireless radiation: "Effect of radiofrequency radiation from Wi-Fi devices on mercury release from amalgam restorations." Paknahad M, Mortazavi SMJ, Shahidi S, Mortazavi G, Haghani M.
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: Here's a published, peer-reviewed research article on the effects of wireless radiation: "Effect of radiofrequency radiation from Wi-Fi devices on mercury release from amalgam restorations." Paknahad M, Mortazavi SMJ, Shahidi S, Mortazavi G, Haghani M.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077204

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077204

Here's a published, peer-reviewed research article on the effects of wireless radiation: "Effect of radiofrequency radiation from Wi-Fi devices on mercury release from amalgam restorations." Paknahad M, Mortazavi SMJ, Shahidi S, Mortazavi G, Haghani M. Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, 2016.

#2285I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its dec…by Mindy Maxwell » 2026-09-21
Cancer & tumorsChildren, schools & developmentWi-Fi, meters & wireless devicesWildlife & environmentExposure limits & testingCourt remand & agency accountabilityResearch, evidence & monitoring
AI summary & topic connections
  • Cancer & tumors: The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer.
  • Children, schools & development: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Wildlife & environment: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Exposure limits & testing: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
  • Court remand & agency accountability: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077203

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077203

I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. I urge the FCC to give meaningful consideration to the experiences and evidence before it and to fully address each of the issues identified by the court.

#2286My personal experience includes the need to turn off my WiFi router at night in order to sleep. This has …by Noel A Taylor DC » 2026-09-21
Sleep & neurological concernsWi-Fi, meters & wireless devicesCourt remand & agency accountabilityResearch, evidence & monitoring
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077202

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077202

My personal experience includes the need to turn off my WiFi router at night in order to sleep. This has been a problem for me ever since I obtained internet services in my home. On the other hand, the research has been quite clear since 2015 that wireless radiation is a health hazard. Here (below) is a link to an explanation that you have either missed or ignored. Please get up to speed before ruling. Thank you. https://eng.unimelb.edu.au/engage-with-us/lectures/davis-2015

#2287The wireless radiation has induced tinitus in my ears. I ground my feet on the earth and grounding mats t…by Louise Gaston » 2026-09-21
Sensitivity & health experiencesWi-Fi, meters & wireless devices
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077201

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077201

The wireless radiation has induced tinitus in my ears. I ground my feet on the earth and grounding mats to control this ill effect of wireless radiation. I also opted out of the smart meter.

#2288I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its dec…by Maggie Roberts, Gary Roberts, Justin Roberts » 2026-09-21
Sensitivity & health experiencesCancer & tumorsChildren, schools & developmentWi-Fi, meters & wireless devicesWildlife & environmentExposure limits & testingCourt remand & agency accountabilityResearch, evidence & monitoring
AI summary & topic connections
  • Sensitivity & health experiences: This issue matters to me personally because we have seen the effects of wireless radiation through headaches, cancer, decrease in focusing abilities, and many other health related issues.
  • Cancer & tumors: The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer.
  • Children, schools & development: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Wildlife & environment: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Exposure limits & testing: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
  • Court remand & agency accountability: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077200

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077200

I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. This issue matters to me personally because we have seen the effects of wireless radiation through headaches, cancer, decrease in focusing abilities, and many other health related issues. I urge the FCC to give meaningful consideration to the experiences and evidence before it and to fully address each of the issues identified by the court.

#2289I have followed science on EMF exposure for many years. The majority of non-industry-funded studies are s…by Douglas Collins » 2026-09-21
Research, evidence & monitoring
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077199

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077199

I have followed science on EMF exposure for many years. The majority of non-industry-funded studies are showing reason for lots of concern in the matter of exposure. And increasingly, it is becoming difficult to find living locations that fall into low- or no-impact levels of EMF. And even if one finds them, there is no guarantee that locations will stay that way if there is no public input allowed. It's not out of order to state that this is already likely a significant public health problem. There should be a moratorium on any activity which increases EMF, robust unbiased study of biological effects, and more public and local oversight on proposed projects that would increase EMF.

#2290Wireless radiation has caused me to have sleep problems over the last several years. Most recently, I hav…by Elizabeth Rozmarniewicz » 2026-09-21
Sensitivity & health experiencesSleep & neurological concernsTowers, antennas & sitingWi-Fi, meters & wireless devicesExposure limits & testingResearch, evidence & monitoring
AI summary & topic connections
  • Sensitivity & health experiences: I'm very sensitive to this wireless technology and have begun the process of de-smart metering my home as well as unplugging my wireless router in my home.
  • Sleep & neurological concerns: Wireless radiation has caused me to have sleep problems over the last several years.
  • Towers, antennas & siting: He emphasized that American leadership in 5G must be an immediate national priority and that the agency would allow the technology to flourish without what he termed "needlessly prescriptive regulations".
  • Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: I'm very sensitive to this wireless technology and have begun the process of de-smart metering my home as well as unplugging my wireless router in my home.
  • Exposure limits & testing: We Americans are demanding updated radiation guidelines and testing.
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: There have NEVER been ANY safety studies for this technology, which is criminal in my opinion.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077198

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077198

Wireless radiation has caused me to have sleep problems over the last several years. Most recently, I have been experiencing electrical issues with my heart. I'm very sensitive to this wireless technology and have begun the process of de-smart metering my home as well as unplugging my wireless router in my home. There have NEVER been ANY safety studies for this technology, which is criminal in my opinion. At a minimum, the government should require safety studies. Tom Wheeler, former FCC chair, famously declared, "Unlike some countries, we do not believe we should spend the next couple of years writing committee reports... turning innovators loose is far more preferable than unleashing committees. He emphasized that American leadership in 5G must be an immediate national priority and that the agency would allow the technology to flourish without what he termed "needlessly prescriptive regulations". Because the FCC did not commission or require new independent medical or environmental safety studies prior to greenlighting the 5G spectrum rollout. We Americans are demanding updated radiation guidelines and testing.

#2291Attachment-only filingby Ellen Marie Domeny-Gowin » 2026-09-21
Attachment-only filings
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077196

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077196

Official documents · 1

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#2292I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its dec…by JohnDay MD » 2026-09-21
Cancer & tumorsChildren, schools & developmentTowers, antennas & sitingWi-Fi, meters & wireless devicesWildlife & environmentExposure limits & testingCourt remand & agency accountabilityResearch, evidence & monitoring
AI summary & topic connections
  • Cancer & tumors: The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer.
  • Children, schools & development: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Towers, antennas & siting: This issue matters to me personally because: A dear elderly friend of mine killed herself last November after months of living with nearly constant radio-chatterfrom a nearby microwave tower, no matter what she tried, including a Faraday Cage, which helped incompletely.
  • Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Wildlife & environment: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Exposure limits & testing: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
  • Court remand & agency accountability: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077195

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077195

I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. This issue matters to me personally because: A dear elderly friend of mine killed herself last November after months of living with nearly constant radio-chatterfrom a nearby microwave tower, no matter what she tried, including a Faraday Cage, which helped incompletely. She was clear-headed, not mentally ill. She had lived through a lot, including metastatic breast cancer 20 years before, but this did her in. I urge the FCC to give meaningful consideration to the experiences and evidence before it and to fully address each of the issues identified by the court.

#2293I am strongly urging the FCC to conduct a study on the health effects of wireless radiation. I experience…by Jill Shepherd » 2026-09-21
Towers, antennas & sitingWi-Fi, meters & wireless devicesResearch, evidence & monitoring
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077194

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077194

I am strongly urging the FCC to conduct a study on the health effects of wireless radiation. I experience extreme ear ringing when I am in proximity to people with cell phones, especially those with 5G. I know it is coming from the wireless radiation that bombards my body as when I took a vacation to Northern Minnesota and was on a very remote lake with very poor cell phone reception, my ear ringing went away. I also felt more energetic and clear-minded. It is time for an appropriate scientific study on the effects of wireless radiation. The American people cannot wait any longer. Please.

#2294I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its dec…by Roxanne Pryhorocki » 2026-09-21
Sensitivity & health experiencesSleep & neurological concernsCancer & tumorsChildren, schools & developmentWi-Fi, meters & wireless devicesWildlife & environmentExposure limits & testingCourt remand & agency accountabilityResearch, evidence & monitoring
AI summary & topic connections
  • Sensitivity & health experiences: This issue matters to me personally because: I'm without energy, I'm so tired that my level of activity is very limited, I have chronic insomnia, my wounds take months to heal if at all.
  • Sleep & neurological concerns: This issue matters to me personally because: I'm without energy, I'm so tired that my level of activity is very limited, I have chronic insomnia, my wounds take months to heal if at all.
  • Cancer & tumors: The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer.
  • Children, schools & development: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Wildlife & environment: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Exposure limits & testing: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
  • Court remand & agency accountability: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077193

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077193

I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. This issue matters to me personally because: I'm without energy, I'm so tired that my level of activity is very limited, I have chronic insomnia, my wounds take months to heal if at all. My mind is foggy and I can't concentrate. My vision has gotten worse very quickly. I urge the FCC to give meaningful consideration to the experiences and evidence before it and to fully address each of the issues identified by the court.

#2295My provider charges $16.50 per month in order for me to keep my analog meter. I am well versed on the rad…by James McKindles » 2026-09-21
Towers, antennas & sitingWi-Fi, meters & wireless devices
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077192

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077192

My provider charges $16.50 per month in order for me to keep my analog meter. I am well versed on the radiation being emitted by the misnamed smart meters, cell towers/phones. You, the FCC haven't done your job by allowing the 1996 Comm Act to be legal. It, the "1996 Tel Comm Act," is a direct violation of the Peoples 4rth and 5th Amendment Rights and yet you still don't act to solve this nightmare. SCOTUS has alredy instructed you to make corrections yet all I hear are crickets. Get off your fat asses, stop taking the bribes and do your job!

#2296I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its dec…by Edward Zullo » 2026-09-21
Sensitivity & health experiencesCancer & tumorsChildren, schools & developmentTowers, antennas & sitingWi-Fi, meters & wireless devicesWildlife & environmentExposure limits & testingCourt remand & agency accountabilityResearch, evidence & monitoring
AI summary & topic connections
  • Sensitivity & health experiences: Ear ringing goes away and headaches are less.
  • Cancer & tumors: The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer.
  • Children, schools & development: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Towers, antennas & siting: Some patients are much more sensitive than others and some of them have moved to less congested areas specifically to get away from the cell towers.
  • Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Wildlife & environment: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Exposure limits & testing: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
  • Court remand & agency accountability: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077190 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077190 I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. This issue matters to me personally because: There are many reasons that I know that RF is harmful; my own personal experience from when I have the opportunity to stay with friends that live very far from congested areas. Ear ringing goes away and headaches are less. They, the headaches and ear ringing, come back as soon as I return home to Yardley boro. Also, I’m an acupuncturist and I have many patients that tell me similar stories about decreased symptoms when they leave the area. Some patients are much more sensitive than others and some of them have moved to less congested areas specifically to get away from the cell towers. To be honest and…

Read the full comment →

#2297Attachment-only filingby Lonnie Gordon » 2026-09-21
Attachment-only filings
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077189

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077189

Official documents · 1

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#2298I strongly urge the FCC/ US government to take this issue seriously and revisit the current wireless regu…by david moonan » 2026-09-21
Exposure limits & testing
AI summary & topic connections
  • Exposure limits & testing: I strongly urge the FCC/ US government to take this issue seriously and revisit the current wireless regulations, which are inadequate and are negatively impacting the health of Americans.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077188

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077188

I strongly urge the FCC/ US government to take this issue seriously and revisit the current wireless regulations, which are inadequate and are negatively impacting the health of Americans.

#2299The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental…by Paul Berland » 2026-09-21
Cancer & tumorsChildren, schools & developmentTowers, antennas & sitingWildlife & environmentExposure limits & testingCourt remand & agency accountabilityResearch, evidence & monitoring
AI summary & topic connections
  • Cancer & tumors: The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment.
  • Children, schools & development: The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment.
  • Towers, antennas & siting: This issue matters to me personally because I have seen the video of bees dying close to a 5G tower, and the video and story of the island of birds where the birds died off because of the proximity of cell towers.
  • Wildlife & environment: The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment.
  • Exposure limits & testing: The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment.
  • Court remand & agency accountability: Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court.
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077187

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077187

The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. This issue matters to me personally because I have seen the video of bees dying close to a 5G tower, and the video and story of the island of birds where the birds died off because of the proximity of cell towers. I am concerned about the birds and bees that are fundamental for our ecosystems. I suspect that the presence of 5G cell towers is affecting all the nature and wildlife in a detrimental way. This was revealed to me by a possible manifestation of God. The radio frequencies are infiltrating everywhere, into every biological body in range. They are detrimental and we need to really study the health effects in a scientific manner.

#2300I am very sensitive to EMF radiation. I cannot be near cell phone towers, smart meters, flat screen telev…by Jacqueline Victor » 2026-09-21
Sensitivity & health experiencesChildren, schools & developmentTowers, antennas & sitingWi-Fi, meters & wireless devices
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077186

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077186

I am very sensitive to EMF radiation. I cannot be near cell phone towers, smart meters, flat screen televisions, routers, or a room full of cell phones. I believe I am the canary in the coal mine--perhaps I'm the lucky one. My headaches, chills, and discomfort around these devices doesn't mean I'm unusual, but give me a chance to try to avoid EMF radiation. All living things are effected by EMF radiation whether they are sensitive enough to consciously feel it or not. Our children have no say about EMF radiation in their schools, playgrounds, rec centers or homes. Many of them carry cell phones. The FCC appears to be captured by the wireless providers using very outdated standards to evaluate our safety. Please reevaluate this hazard. Thank-you.