All FCC comments · page 113

2,415 public comments, newest first, 20 per page. Keep scrolling to load more.

#2241I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its dec…by M.L. Openshaw » 2026-09-21

AI summary & topic connections

Cancer & tumors: The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer.
Children, schools & development: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
Wildlife & environment: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
Exposure limits & testing: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
Court remand & agency accountability: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
Research, evidence & monitoring: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077257

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077257

I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. This issue matters to me personally because I am concerned about myself and my living environment. I need for you to currently test for all impacts to humans, animals, and our environments. Health impacts need to be heard when licenses/applications are being reviewed in public hearings. "We the people" need an agency set up to protect the people, such as the FCC, to gather the objective scientific data for the health agencies to know the impacts to and protect the people's safety and health. Objective, repeatable data not influenced by corporate financial gain. I urge the FCC to give meaningful consideration to the experiences and evidence before it and to fully address each of the issues identified by the court.

#2242Attachment-only filingby Lynn M » 2026-09-21

Attachment-only filings

AI summary & topic connections

Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077256

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077256

Official documents · 1

Non-native EMFs.pdf ↗

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#2243The FCC has been directed to explain its guidelines to protect humans from harm including crucial forms o…by Noella Schum » 2026-09-21

Sensitivity & health experiences Sleep & neurological concerns Towers, antennas & siting Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices Research, evidence & monitoring

AI summary & topic connections

Sensitivity & health experiences: Since 1996 I have chronic pain, palpitations, double vision, insomnia unexplained but notably around computer/phone/near 3-5G
Sleep & neurological concerns: Since 1996 I have chronic pain, palpitations, double vision, insomnia unexplained but notably around computer/phone/near 3-5G
Towers, antennas & siting: , this concerning lackadaisical rules and guidelines concerning RF, EMF, cell tower placement, wifi pollution and the inability for the population to have input over the abuse of Tech to over ride any possible restrictions/studies.
Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: , this concerning lackadaisical rules and guidelines concerning RF, EMF, cell tower placement, wifi pollution and the inability for the population to have input over the abuse of Tech to over ride any possible restrictions/studies.
Research, evidence & monitoring: , this concerning lackadaisical rules and guidelines concerning RF, EMF, cell tower placement, wifi pollution and the inability for the population to have input over the abuse of Tech to over ride any possible restrictions/studies.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077255

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077255

The FCC has been directed to explain its guidelines to protect humans from harm including crucial forms of life that support humans including food sources. , this concerning lackadaisical rules and guidelines concerning RF, EMF, cell tower placement, wifi pollution and the inability for the population to have input over the abuse of Tech to over ride any possible restrictions/studies. . The FCC should not have sole... they are not in the medical field. Only health experts who work with sick people. Since 1996 I have chronic pain, palpitations, double vision, insomnia unexplained but notably around computer/phone/near 3-5G

#2244This email is a reply to the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its d…by Melyssa Rice » 2026-09-21

Sensitivity & health experiences Cancer & tumors Children, schools & development Towers, antennas & siting Wildlife & environment Exposure limits & testing Court remand & agency accountability Research, evidence & monitoring

AI summary & topic connections

Sensitivity & health experiences: This issue matters to me personally because ever since the summer of 2020, when 5G became ubiquitous without any testing or even discussion of its health impacts, I suddenly had EMF intolerance and tinnitus.
Cancer & tumors: The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer.
Children, schools & development: It’s shameful that the FCC is not fully considering evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment.
Towers, antennas & siting: This issue matters to me personally because ever since the summer of 2020, when 5G became ubiquitous without any testing or even discussion of its health impacts, I suddenly had EMF intolerance and tinnitus.
Wildlife & environment: It’s shameful that the FCC is not fully considering evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment.
Exposure limits & testing: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
Court remand & agency accountability: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
Research, evidence & monitoring: It’s shameful that the FCC is not fully considering evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077254

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077254

This email is a reply to the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. It’s shameful that the FCC is not fully considering evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC must recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. This issue matters to me personally because ever since the summer of 2020, when 5G became ubiquitous without any testing or even discussion of its health impacts, I suddenly had EMF intolerance and tinnitus. Neither of these conditions normally appear suddenly, but huge numbers of people had the same experience that I did in 2020. The FCC’s job, among other things, is to protect people from harmful radiation. It is currently failing at this important duty. I urge the FCC to give meaningful consideration to the experiences and evidence before it. To do less than this is to continue in its complete dereliction of duty.

#2245I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its dec…by Brian Havermann » 2026-09-21

Cancer & tumors Children, schools & development Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices Wildlife & environment Exposure limits & testing Court remand & agency accountability Research, evidence & monitoring

AI summary & topic connections

Cancer & tumors: The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer.
Children, schools & development: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
Wildlife & environment: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
Exposure limits & testing: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
Court remand & agency accountability: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
Research, evidence & monitoring: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077249

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077249

I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. I urge the FCC to give meaningful consideration to the experiences and evidence before it and to fully address each of the issues identified by the court.

#2246I am a 73 year old male. Over the last few years I have developed a very real and very inconvenient sensi…by Theodore L Dixon » 2026-09-21

E-Rate & school connectivity Cancer & tumors Children, schools & development Towers, antennas & siting Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices

AI summary & topic connections

E-Rate & school connectivity: Over the last few years I have developed a very real and very inconvenient sensitivity in my hands to any electromagnetic field generated by wireless devices.
Cancer & tumors: Auto-immune diseases and cancer rates are soaring, especially among young adults and children who are defenseless to speak up for themselves.
Children, schools & development: Auto-immune diseases and cancer rates are soaring, especially among young adults and children who are defenseless to speak up for themselves.
Towers, antennas & siting: I now have to wear EMF protection gloves when I use my phone, tablet, TV/Roku wireless remotes or anything that is wireless and depends on WiFi or data modems or towers for signal transmission.
Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: Over the last few years I have developed a very real and very inconvenient sensitivity in my hands to any electromagnetic field generated by wireless devices.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077248

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077248

I am a 73 year old male. Over the last few years I have developed a very real and very inconvenient sensitivity in my hands to any electromagnetic field generated by wireless devices. I now have to wear EMF protection gloves when I use my phone, tablet, TV/Roku wireless remotes or anything that is wireless and depends on WiFi or data modems or towers for signal transmission. My hands burn when I do not use my gloves, even when I use wireless devices for a few seconds! I've had to change all of my wireless computer accessories and return to wired/corded connections. All of this began happening during the 4G days. I have read many accounts similar to mine, and many that are worse than mine. Since I am adversely affected by the simple devices I named, what else is happening because of larger and more powerful structures, such as towers? I urge you to stop moving forward with technologies that immediately harm EMF/Radiation sensitive people like me and place everyone else, including yourselves, in a kind of living test laboratory. Auto-immune diseases and cancer rates are soaring, especially among young adults and children who are defenseless to speak up for themselves. Pursuing money and power over the health of Americans is unethical!

#2247I live 500 meters from a high level 5/6 G tower. I have been experiencing severe headaches and restless s…by DR Jennifer Ramelmeier » 2026-09-21

Sensitivity & health experiences Sleep & neurological concerns Children, schools & development Towers, antennas & siting Wildlife & environment

AI summary & topic connections

Sensitivity & health experiences: I have been experiencing severe headaches and restless sleep(I must wear special hats to mitigate some of it's effect to help with the pain) Also we used to have bees and they always died after a year These towers that are in residential areas and school zones must be taken down now.
Sleep & neurological concerns: I have been experiencing severe headaches and restless sleep(I must wear special hats to mitigate some of it's effect to help with the pain) Also we used to have bees and they always died after a year These towers that are in residential areas and school zones must be taken down now.
Children, schools & development: I have been experiencing severe headaches and restless sleep(I must wear special hats to mitigate some of it's effect to help with the pain) Also we used to have bees and they always died after a year These towers that are in residential areas and school zones must be taken down now.
Towers, antennas & siting: I live 500 meters from a high level 5/6 G tower.
Wildlife & environment: I have been experiencing severe headaches and restless sleep(I must wear special hats to mitigate some of it's effect to help with the pain) Also we used to have bees and they always died after a year These towers that are in residential areas and school zones must be taken down now.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077247

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077247

I live 500 meters from a high level 5/6 G tower. I have been experiencing severe headaches and restless sleep(I must wear special hats to mitigate some of it's effect to help with the pain) Also we used to have bees and they always died after a year These towers that are in residential areas and school zones must be taken down now.

#2248I know when the cell towers went to 5 G, the children and families in the area of the tower all got sick.…by Diane » 2026-09-21

Sensitivity & health experiences Children, schools & development Towers, antennas & siting Research, evidence & monitoring

AI summary & topic connections

Sensitivity & health experiences: This was like having the flu, body aches, headaches.
Children, schools & development: I know when the cell towers went to 5 G, the children and families in the area of the tower all got sick.
Towers, antennas & siting: I know when the cell towers went to 5 G, the children and families in the area of the tower all got sick.
Research, evidence & monitoring: Cornell did a study, never saw the results.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077246

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077246

I know when the cell towers went to 5 G, the children and families in the area of the tower all got sick. This was like having the flu, body aches, headaches. When the cell tower went in the farmers in the area had cows abort their calves and then you also had the uterine prolapse, which takes a cow out of production. Cornell did a study, never saw the results. It time to end the addition of towers, and upping the level.

#2249I lost my husband to cancer 5 months ago. If you ever saw a loved one die of this disease, its unbearable…by Charlene Goldberg » 2026-09-21

Cancer & tumors Research, evidence & monitoring

AI summary & topic connections

Cancer & tumors: I lost my husband to cancer 5 months ago.
Research, evidence & monitoring: Studies have been done on the effects of wireless radiation.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077244

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077244

I lost my husband to cancer 5 months ago. If you ever saw a loved one die of this disease, its unbearable. Studies have been done on the effects of wireless radiation. I fear for all of us on this planet!

#2250To whom it concerns, Wireless radiation has not been properly tested for safety. I urge the FCC to ensure…by Lawrence Kochert » 2026-09-21

Exposure limits & testing

AI summary & topic connections

Exposure limits & testing: Please due the proper testing.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077243

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077243

To whom it concerns, Wireless radiation has not been properly tested for safety. I urge the FCC to ensure this is done. Please due the proper testing. Lawrence Kochert

#2251Since the installation of 5G in y area I am tired so much of the time. My son who lives with me has to ta…by Julia Muller Calderon » 2026-09-21

Sensitivity & health experiences Children, schools & development Towers, antennas & siting Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices

AI summary & topic connections

Sensitivity & health experiences: Since the installation of 5G in y area I am tired so much of the time.
Children, schools & development: My son who lives with me has to take a long nap during the day too.
Towers, antennas & siting: Since the installation of 5G in y area I am tired so much of the time.
Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: I try to keep as many wireless devices out of my home as possible, and even pay $10 a month extra to have an analog electrical meter.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077241

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077241

Since the installation of 5G in y area I am tired so much of the time. My son who lives with me has to take a long nap during the day too. The before and after effect has been abrupt, not gradual. I try to keep as many wireless devices out of my home as possible, and even pay $10 a month extra to have an analog electrical meter. It amazes me how the government could make an experiment of this magnitude without being entirely sure of the health effects on every living creature on this planet.

#2252Attachment-only filingby Bart Winston » 2026-09-21

Attachment-only filings

AI summary & topic connections

Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077239

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077239

Official documents · 2

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#2253ET Docket No. 13-84.by Lan Quach » 2026-09-21

Other public filings

AI summary & topic connections

Other public filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077238

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077238

ET Docket No. 13-84.

#2254Attachment-only filingby Kupersmid » 2026-09-21

Attachment-only filings

AI summary & topic connections

Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077237

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077237

Official documents · 1

FCC Comment.pdf ↗

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#2255I’m old enough to recall safety concerns with wireless radiation so I’ve taken steps to actively limit ex…by Nathan Milligan » 2026-09-21

Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices Exposure limits & testing

AI summary & topic connections

Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: I’m old enough to recall safety concerns with wireless radiation so I’ve taken steps to actively limit exposures but i see 25 year olds now keeping their phones in their pockets or restimg on their lap- they assume that all is fine because surely we would know if it was.
Exposure limits & testing: Safety assessments are long, long overdue.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077236

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077236

I’m old enough to recall safety concerns with wireless radiation so I’ve taken steps to actively limit exposures but i see 25 year olds now keeping their phones in their pockets or restimg on their lap- they assume that all is fine because surely we would know if it was. Safety assessments are long, long overdue.

#2256I have definitely noticed pain and a tingling sensation in my hands when using certain cell phones (so I …by Jared Fearon » 2026-09-21

Sensitivity & health experiences Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices Research, evidence & monitoring

AI summary & topic connections

Sensitivity & health experiences: I have definitely noticed pain and a tingling sensation in my hands when using certain cell phones (so I use them less often now.
Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: I have definitely noticed pain and a tingling sensation in my hands when using certain cell phones (so I use them less often now.
Research, evidence & monitoring: I think we should conduct studies to try and understand some of the risks, and hopefully try to make wireless technologies safer to use.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077235

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077235

I have definitely noticed pain and a tingling sensation in my hands when using certain cell phones (so I use them less often now. I think we should conduct studies to try and understand some of the risks, and hopefully try to make wireless technologies safer to use.

#2257RF radiation exposure that i have been exposed to has caused Brain fog, hearing problems/buzzing and fati…by beth chiodo » 2026-09-21

Sensitivity & health experiences Sleep & neurological concerns

AI summary & topic connections

Sensitivity & health experiences: RF radiation exposure that i have been exposed to has caused Brain fog, hearing problems/buzzing and fatigue.
Sleep & neurological concerns: RF radiation exposure that i have been exposed to has caused Brain fog, hearing problems/buzzing and fatigue.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077234

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077234

RF radiation exposure that i have been exposed to has caused Brain fog, hearing problems/buzzing and fatigue. This has reduced my ability to work. Pleaase update your regulations to reflect the negative effects of RF radiation. Thank you Beth Chiodo

#2258I've personally been impacted by wireless radiation through devices at home and work. From headaches, sle…by Diane Liska » 2026-09-21

Sensitivity & health experiences Sleep & neurological concerns Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices Exposure limits & testing Research, evidence & monitoring

AI summary & topic connections

Sensitivity & health experiences: From headaches, sleeplessness, and inability to concentrate, wireless radiation has significantly impacted my life, as I've had to spend money i don't have on airtube headphones and expensive EMF blockers that I must carry everywhere to stay in my protected bubble.
Sleep & neurological concerns: From headaches, sleeplessness, and inability to concentrate, wireless radiation has significantly impacted my life, as I've had to spend money i don't have on airtube headphones and expensive EMF blockers that I must carry everywhere to stay in my protected bubble.
Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: This has helped, but I don't know what the next generation phones and other technology may bring that I'll have to research ways to mitigate just so I can function.
Exposure limits & testing: It's egregious that the FCC has allowed unbridled rollout of all of this wireless radiation without simple safety testing.
Research, evidence & monitoring: This has helped, but I don't know what the next generation phones and other technology may bring that I'll have to research ways to mitigate just so I can function.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077233

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077233

I've personally been impacted by wireless radiation through devices at home and work. From headaches, sleeplessness, and inability to concentrate, wireless radiation has significantly impacted my life, as I've had to spend money i don't have on airtube headphones and expensive EMF blockers that I must carry everywhere to stay in my protected bubble. This has helped, but I don't know what the next generation phones and other technology may bring that I'll have to research ways to mitigate just so I can function. It's egregious that the FCC has allowed unbridled rollout of all of this wireless radiation without simple safety testing. Go to those in the EMF blocking industry. They can help, quickly. Stop harming generations of people.

#2259When I hold my phone up to my ear my head hurts for hours. My arm bones hurt just from holding it. When I…by Sarah Keister » 2026-09-21

Sensitivity & health experiences Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices

AI summary & topic connections

Sensitivity & health experiences: When I hold my phone up to my ear my head hurts for hours.
Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: When I hold my phone up to my ear my head hurts for hours.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077232

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077232

When I hold my phone up to my ear my head hurts for hours. My arm bones hurt just from holding it. When I go places with no cell service, all my tension and anxiety just melts away. I believe it worsens anemia.

#2260I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its dec…by Mary Donovan » 2026-09-21

Cancer & tumors Children, schools & development Towers, antennas & siting Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices Wildlife & environment Exposure limits & testing Court remand & agency accountability Research, evidence & monitoring

AI summary & topic connections

Cancer & tumors: The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer.
Children, schools & development: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
Towers, antennas & siting: There are seven cell towers within three miles of our building, two of which are within less than one-half mile.
Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
Wildlife & environment: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
Exposure limits & testing: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
Court remand & agency accountability: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
Research, evidence & monitoring: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077231

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077231

I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. This issue matters to me personally because: I live in a condominium complex and my building has five attached units. Five out of the five units have residents who have been diagnosed with cancer, four with bladder cancer and one with lymphoma. We have had the water tested by the State DEP and the result shows no reason for concern. There are seven cell towers within three miles of our building, two of which are within less than one-half mile. I urge the FCC to give meaningful consideration to the experiences and evidence before it and to fully address each of the issues identified by the court.