I have followed science on EMF exposure for many years. The majority of non-industry-funded studies are s…

FCC public comment #26110077199 · ET Docket 13-84 · 2026-09-21

#1I have followed science on EMF exposure for many years. The majority of non-industry-funded studies are s…by Douglas Collins » 2026-09-21
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077199

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077199

I have followed science on EMF exposure for many years. The majority of non-industry-funded studies are showing reason for lots of concern in the matter of exposure. And increasingly, it is becoming difficult to find living locations that fall into low- or no-impact levels of EMF. And even if one finds them, there is no guarantee that locations will stay that way if there is no public input allowed. It's not out of order to state that this is already likely a significant public health problem. There should be a moratorium on any activity which increases EMF, robust unbiased study of biological effects, and more public and local oversight on proposed projects that would increase EMF.

Share this public comment

Share guide: link to the comment page, quote the commenter's own words, and point people to the official docket to file their own comment.

Discuss this comment

Replies are reviewed before they appear. This is a community discussion, not an official FCC filing.

Replies