All FCC comments · page 116

26110077185

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077185

I was diagnosed with extreme EMR sensitivity at work when they moved my office in front of largeadjacent computer and phone database space. Within minutes of being in my new office, my heart rate was over 120 BPM I was nauseous and felt faint so I called OSHA RR in company and was sent to ER where my BP was 210/110 and they wanted to admit me to hospital - i refused, recd therapy and stayed there all day for observation When I was released they told me I had severe sensitivity to EMR, and needed to watch my environment To militate it/ I have trouble staying at any hotel, can’t work in many spaces with excessive wireless. Have severe sleeping issues unless I Use expensive tools to mitigate exposure. I was doing oat home until Xcel Emergy and WI refused to give me health consideration for a smart meter outside and below my BR. I have spent $1K + To mitigate so I can sleep but still have major medical issues. I carry my phone in a radiation bag and avoid all sources of this radiation in my environment. It severely limits my life, and it’s inconceivable that the State of WI and Xcel Energy cannot grant health exceptions to smart meters etc with diagnosed health issues. We plead for help to assist us and remove this health threat. We should be able to have a safe nontoxic home that does not threaten our health since we pay taxes to live in it.

26110077184

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077184

26110077182

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077182

Radiation has gotten out of hand. I work in the public schools as a RN. Is the FCC at all concerned about what happening to our children? Shame on you for not seeing this gross injustice to our children. Obesity, ADHD, seizures, Diabetes, just to name a few.

26110077181

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077181

We are writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. We urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. We urge the FCC to give meaningful consideration to the experiences and evidence before it and to fully address each of the issues identified by the court.

26110077179 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077179 I was occupationally exposed and became sensitized to electromagnetic radiation in 2003. My neurologist of over 30 years has acknowledged in writing that I am sensitive to electromagnetic radiation. I am now forced to live in an exponentially increasing amount of RF radiation which greatly exacerbates migraine headaches and results in extreme insomnia if I am not protected (which is everywhere outside of my home, including medical offices, hospitals, etc.). I have spent years studying this and untold thousands of dollars on mitigation including wired only connections for phone* and internet such as coaxial cable and ethernet, health strategies and metering, metal roof and special fabric (mostly silver) for bed canopy and windows. I do not use a cell phone (*but have one only in case of emergency as there are no longer any alternatives and it is contained in a metal box and always off because even on airplane mode phones can "leak" which I have detected and measured). I have contacted state and federal representatives and agencies, some of which include innumerable congressional representatives, Florida Public Service Commission which was compelled by some of us to hold a hearing on smart meters to ultimately be told that no one has any authority over health effects other than the FCC, Brevard County Commission, former Governor Scott, Attorney General of the State of Florida, the FCC-numerous times, FDA, etc., basically to no avail, partly because the FCC is a captured agency which has thus far refused to acknowledge the now hundreds if not thousands of studies demonstrating BIOLOGICAL effects (not thermal) of RF radiation at very low levels or to perform required NEPA studies for small cells despite a federal appellate court ruling! I apparently have NO protection under the ADA due to the FCC's blatant negligence and loyalty to the telecoms rather than the American public. After suffering for over 2 decades I am no longer mincing words and have lost all faith in US government agencies. The US has among the worst EMR standards in the world and seemingly does not care at all for the fate of its children who…

Read the full comment →

26110077178 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077178 I am writing today regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology, or public health; yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. This issue matters deeply to me personally as someone who has experienced unexplainable, chronic headaches that started, coincidentally, around the time our house was 'upgraded' to wireless electric usage transmission. I would like proper scientific studies that investigate the effects of wireless signals on our brains. It is particularly concerning to me because I am an adult who is, perhaps, more sensitive than other adults--what about the effects on children's developing brains? What about migratory wildlife that utilize magnetic fields to guide their journey? We are energetic beings, and to reject out of hand that RF radiation and…

Read the full comment →

26110077176

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077176

Unseen radiation affects the cells in the body. Many instances have been reported of tumors started right behind the ear, where the cell phone is held. People who live near cell phone towers develop serious cancers. Unseen radiation of any kind impacts the human body. It must be taken into consideration, before permitting more radiation to be loosed on humanity. Americans are among the unhealthiest in the world and spend more on drugs and medical treatments, because of our government's promotion of money-making industries at the expense of the mental and physical health of the American people...This will eventually take down America.

26110077175

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077175

I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. This issue matters to me personally because: As a primary healthcare provider for 44 years and after just hearing Michael Adams present a 13 chapter presentation on genetic survival, I urge each member of the CC to listen to the potential interactions that occur when mRNA spike proteins meet the wireless radiation affects. If it is a population reduction that you are interested in producing then go ahead and continue with this propagation of electromagnetic field Radiation. Reference this at geneticsurvival.com. I urge the FCC to give meaningful consideration to the experiences and evidence before it and to fully address each of the issues identified by the court.

26110077174

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077174

26110077173 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077173 I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. There is substantial evidence of harm from RF radiation and I myself have experienced negative effects. I sat next to a wifi router for two years and finally realized that metabolic issues and fatigue were likely due to the router which I moved. However, I find that wifi-rich environments make me tired and brain-fogged. The US Government / FCC MUST Examine the available data/studies and not just the industry-paid studies but the real studies that are done more accurately. There are many! The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. This issue matters to me personally because: of what I mention above, as well as I know many friends who become quite ill when they are in WiFi – several of them…

Read the full comment →

26110077172

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077172

In 2002 I developed a benign parotid adenoma in the deep lobe of my left parotid from extensive use of a cell phone on that side. I had it surgically resected in 2003 but the surgery left me with permanent paralysis of my left lower lip.

26110077171

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077171

We must develop a greater protocol for future development and the current hazards each and every home suffers from. Ultimately the public trust gets impacted which usually spills into revolts and unnecessary protests that the FCC could’ve helped avoid. In fact it is starting from here which will regain that public trust again for us to become the thriving nation we started off as. I have such great solutions with my experience as a health and wellness coach that your going to wish you found me earlier.

26110077170

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077170

In 2016 I was working in an office which was close to an apartment building which had maybe 10 or so cell towers on the roof. I started experiencing heart palpitations. After I removed myself from the office in question, my palpitations resolved quickly and have never returned. I know that that doesn't constitute proof, but there was no other obvious cause for this to happen and to be resolved.

26110077169

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077169

To whom it may concern: I periodically suffer from sensitivity to EMF frequencies, esp wireless signals from phones or towers. My range of symptoms is from palpitations when holding a phone too long to just simply touching the phone. It’s hard to find a place to go that has no cell towers molesting every corner and mile of the country. To be honest, I am very suspicious of who is actually benefitting from this technology if it is not those who would usher in a total surveillance state as is being pushed by the World Economic Forum with Agenda 2030. Peter Thiel has publicly stated he thinks technology is a ‘great alternative to politics’ since he open admits his views are in such a minority. This agency is building the infrastructure needed to accomplish Thiels ideals. I dont want to be trapped in a 15 minute ‘city’ and stripped of all my property rights. Were not concentration camps basically 15 minute cities where work makes you free? It is getting hard to justify that so many unconstitutional policies are necessary to ‘national security’ and ‘convenience’ all of which is coming at the cost of violating multiple of those pesky constitutional amendments such as free speech, free assembly, and warrantless searches. Worse, it is coming at greater and greater expense to our health. The cancer rate according to cancer.gov is 1 in every 2.5 people in the US. And of those, only 19 million ‘survive’ as defined by 5 years post diagnosis. Thats about a 13% 5 year survival. This is worse than the bubonic plague. And this agency thinks that more cell towers with less local oversight is just the thing. Only an industrial complex would desire such a thing. Crime is not going down, health is obviously not improving. I cannot even say that current policies coming out of captured agencies are simply misguided….they seem to be abjectly malevolent except to line corporate pockets and give the ruling class/oligarchy even more power….. A ruling class that seems intent to burn everything down just to rule over the ashes. All run by ivy league grads from universities sponsored by Jeffrey Epstein. Those who give up their freedoms for a little bit of safety will receive neither. -Benjamin Franklin

26110077168

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077168

I have experienced extreme toxicity from exposure to my cellphone with symptoms including nausea, headaches, dizziness and brain fog. I have also developed extreme difficulty with being able to sleep since I started using the cellphone so am now looking to switch to a flip phone or other alternative type that emits lower levels of EMFs. It is clearly very toxic.

26110077167

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077167

I have suffered from migraine headaches since Con Ed installed 182 radioactive smart meters directly under my floor. I have all internet cabled so that there is no wifi in my home. My roommate's is blocked by metallic fabric. I pleaded with con ed to cage the meters under my floor which is simple and prevents radiation escape but they refused. All of Europe uses smart meters that are NOT wifi. All of them are run inside fiber cables to remove the danger to humans. Your standards are 40 years behind the current knowledge. This must be ended. If not you will be sued a million times over for serious injuries and disabilities caused by small cell radiation. All of this is known. This is not a secret to anyone and has been known for decades. Please face reality,

26110077166

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077166

My entire life shifted six years ago. Before my demise, I was a successful actress, wrote four books, two screenplays, started a children's theater company, became a spiritual marketer supporting the holistic, therapeutic community, and traveled the world. And then, my world stopped. In succession, I was exposed to mold, botulism, Roundup, and Radiation Poisoning. The radiation was the worst, triggering severe Tinnitus. You see, you can't smell, feel, or see radiation, but you feel it. It still feels like the wires in my brain are shifting. My memory is disappearing; I can no longer sleep through the night. I had to move seven times to stay away from towers, antennas, and transformers. It became worse when the "powers that be" started ramping up the radiation. My teeth started hurting every time I opened the computer. I had to get all my crowns out and get new ones that were compatible with my microbiome. I had to sell my car, buy an old Jeep, remove anything that was electric, and choose a car with fewer EMFs (electromagnetic fields). My gut is worse than ever. I developed SIBO, and no longer have a stomach that can digest anything. I weigh 95 pounds instead of 120. Clearly, it is getting harder and harder to find a place to live where I can use an Ethernet cable or remove the Digital Meter attached to one's home. Analog meters are safer, as they don't bring radiation into the home. Perhaps, one day people will come together and create a safe place to live WITHOUT wires, Transformers, and Towers (that are now being covered with green leaves).

26110077165

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077165

I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. This issue matters to me personally because: My mother contracted ear cancer and had to have the top portion of her ear surgically removed. I have been having headaches almost every day since 1993. I urge the FCC to give meaningful consideration to the experiences and evidence before it and to fully address each of the issues identified by the court.

26110077164 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077164 I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. This issue matters to me personally because: Because at the time that all this wireless radiation was being rolled out in Arlington Virginia my Vitamin D started declining despite getting lots of sunshine. I became prediabetic as my blood sugar increases coincided with each subsequent decline of vitamin D as measured by tests at the doctor's office. I started taking increasing doses of vitamin D3 which helped me avoid diabetes but I eventually developed other autoimmune issues despite a healthy diet and active lifestyle. The doctors I saw were all baffled. I can't prove that EMF was the cause but I suspect that how EMF affects various minerals in…

Read the full comment →

26110077163

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077163

I was living in Fayetteville AR. when cell phone towers first began going up, and there was one near my home. I am very sensitive to EMFs, and when I drove past the tower, I could feel a very toxic energy being emanated from it. I began to have panic attacks because I was becoming forgetful, and I feared I might be coming down with early onset Alzheimer's, but I also suspected it might have been due to the cell phone technology. I decided to move to a much more rural area and as soon as I did, I was fine. Sadly, there is no longer many ways to escape the dangers of cell phone tech. Since then, I have become a member of an international forum online which discusses at length the many toxins , both biological and technological, that are infesting the planet now. There has been no lack for a very long time of very credible evidence about how toxic cell phone tech is not only to humans, but to many lifeforms on Earth, including the bees which human life depends on to continue. I believe we are in the End Times, which so many prophets have warned us against, and that we all need to make sure we are ready to meet our Maker. Those who defend these dangerous technologies will have much to answer for when they do.