Important parameters for optimized metal nanoparticles-aided electromagnetic field (EMF) effect on cancer.

Cancer nanotechnology · 2018 · Unclear · Insufficient evidence

← Research stream

UnclearInsufficient evidencePaper 5548

Study snapshot

PublicationCancer nanotechnology · 2018

Study typeother

Reported directionUnclear

Evidence ratingInsufficient

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A number of experimental research findings for the metal nanoparticles (NPs)-mediated EMF photothermal therapy of cancer cells show an intriguing trend of the NPs' size-dependent efficacy. This is a phenomenon we find to trend with the light absorption bandwidth behavior (full width at half maximum) of the NPs and the accompanying electric field enhancement. We find that the nanoparticle sizes that have been reported to produce the optimized effect on cancer cells are of minimum absorption bandwidth and optimized electric field magnitude. While the death of cancer cells under the NPs-aided EMF effect has in the past attracted varied interpretations, either as a thermal or non-thermal effect, photothermal effect has gained a wide acceptance due to the exhibited hyperthermia. However, the exhibited trend of the NPs' size-dependent efficacy is beginning to feature as a possible manifestation of other overlooked underlying or synergistic phenomenal conditions. METHOD: We present a theoretical model and analysis which reveal that the contribution and efficacy of the metal NPs in the destruction of cancer depend partly but significantly on the accompanying electric field intensity enhancement factor and partly on their absorption cross-section. RESULTS: This paper finds that, other than the expected hyperthermia, the metal NPs' sizes for the optimized therapy on cancer cells seem to fulfill other synergistic conditions which need to come to the fore. We find interplay between electric field and thermal effects as independent energy channels where balancing may be important for the optimized EMF effect, in the ratio of about 5:1. The required balancing depends on the absorption bandwidth and absorption cross-section of the NPs, the frequency of EMF used and the relative permittivity of the cancer cells. The NPs' size-dependent efficacy decreases away from the NPs' size of minimum absorption bandwidth, which is around 20 nm for Au NPs or other shapes of equivalent surface area-volume ratio. While the absorption wavelength peak for metal NPs would change with the change of shape, the responsible condition(s) for optimizing the efficacy remains relatively invariable. CONCLUSION: From the modeling and the analysis of the NPs' size for optimizing the EMF therapy on cancer cells, the ratio of electric field enhancement by metal NPs to the associated thermal effect is a very important factor for efficacy.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeother

Effect directionunclear

Populationcancer cells (not further specified)

Sample sizeNot supplied

ExposureNot supplied

Evidence strengthInsufficientConfidence: 74% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

A theoretical model/analysis suggests that efficacy of metal nanoparticle-mediated EMF photothermal therapy depends on both electric field intensity enhancement and absorption cross-section. The analysis indicates an interplay between electric field and thermal effects as independent energy channels, with an approximate balancing ratio of about 5:1 for optimized effect, and suggests optimized nanoparticle sizes near minimum absorption bandwidth (around 20 nm for Au nanoparticles or equivalent surface area-volume ratio).

Outcomes measured

modeled efficacy/optimization parameters for nanoparticles-mediated EMF photothermal therapy
electric field intensity enhancement factor
absorption cross-section
hyperthermia/thermal effects vs electric field effects

Limitations

The work is a theoretical model/analysis rather than reporting new experimental or clinical outcome data.
EMF frequency, exposure metrics (e.g., SAR), and specific experimental conditions are not specified in the abstract.
Cancer cell type/model and any sample size are not described.

View raw extracted JSON

{
  "study_type": "other",
  "exposure": {
    "band": null,
    "source": "photothermal therapy (metal nanoparticles-aided EMF)",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": "cancer cells (not further specified)",
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "modeled efficacy/optimization parameters for nanoparticles-mediated EMF photothermal therapy",
    "electric field intensity enhancement factor",
    "absorption cross-section",
    "hyperthermia/thermal effects vs electric field effects"
  ],
  "main_findings": "A theoretical model/analysis suggests that efficacy of metal nanoparticle-mediated EMF photothermal therapy depends on both electric field intensity enhancement and absorption cross-section. The analysis indicates an interplay between electric field and thermal effects as independent energy channels, with an approximate balancing ratio of about 5:1 for optimized effect, and suggests optimized nanoparticle sizes near minimum absorption bandwidth (around 20 nm for Au nanoparticles or equivalent surface area-volume ratio).",
  "effect_direction": "unclear",
  "limitations": [
    "The work is a theoretical model/analysis rather than reporting new experimental or clinical outcome data.",
    "EMF frequency, exposure metrics (e.g., SAR), and specific experimental conditions are not specified in the abstract.",
    "Cancer cell type/model and any sample size are not described."
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "insufficient",
  "confidence": 0.74,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "metal nanoparticles",
    "gold nanoparticles",
    "photothermal therapy",
    "electric field enhancement",
    "absorption bandwidth",
    "absorption cross-section",
    "hyperthermia",
    "cancer cells",
    "theoretical model",
    "EMF"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": []
}

AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1186/s12645-018-0038-4
PubMed: 29576808

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library