Effects of magnetic flux density and direction of the magnetic field on growth and CO2 exchange rate of potato plantlets in vitro.

Acta horticulturae · 1996 · Benefit · Low evidence

← Research stream
BenefitLow evidencePaper 4186

Potato plantlets cultured for 20 days under magnetic flux densities of 2, 4, or 6 mT showed beneficial effects around 4 mT on growth promotion and enhanced CO2 uptake, regardless of whether the magnetic field direction was upward or downward. Magnetic field d…

Study snapshot

PublicationActa horticulturae · 1996
Study typein_vitro
Reported directionBenefit
Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

Potato plantlets (Solanum tuberosum L. cv. Benimaru) were cultured in vitro for 20 days on a 10 ml MS agar medium under a magnetic flux density of 0 (control: Cont), 2, 4 or 6 mT (T=Wb m-2) in both upward and downward directions of magnetic field. Air temperature in the head space of the test tubes and photosynthetic flux density on the culture shelf were 25 +/- 1 degrees C and 38 micromoles m-2 s-1 respectively. The results showed that a magnetic flux density of around 4 mT had beneficial effects, regardless of the direction of magnetic field, on the growth promotion and enhancement of CO2 uptake of potato plantlets in vitro The direction of magnetic field at the magnetic flux densities tested had no effects on the growth and CO2 exchange rate.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typein_vitro
Effect directionbenefit
PopulationPotato plantlets (Solanum tuberosum L. cv. Benimaru) cultured in vitro
Sample sizeNot supplied
ExposureELF · 20 days
Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 74% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

Potato plantlets cultured for 20 days under magnetic flux densities of 2, 4, or 6 mT showed beneficial effects around 4 mT on growth promotion and enhanced CO2 uptake, regardless of whether the magnetic field direction was upward or downward. Magnetic field direction at the tested flux densities had no effect on growth or CO2 exchange rate.

Outcomes measured

  • Growth (growth promotion)
  • CO2 uptake / CO2 exchange rate

Limitations

  • Sample size not reported in abstract
  • Exposure frequency not reported (only magnetic flux density and direction described)
  • In vitro plant model; findings may not generalize beyond this experimental system
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "in_vitro",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "ELF",
    "source": "other",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": "20 days"
  },
  "population": "Potato plantlets (Solanum tuberosum L. cv. Benimaru) cultured in vitro",
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "Growth (growth promotion)",
    "CO2 uptake / CO2 exchange rate"
  ],
  "main_findings": "Potato plantlets cultured for 20 days under magnetic flux densities of 2, 4, or 6 mT showed beneficial effects around 4 mT on growth promotion and enhanced CO2 uptake, regardless of whether the magnetic field direction was upward or downward. Magnetic field direction at the tested flux densities had no effect on growth or CO2 exchange rate.",
  "effect_direction": "benefit",
  "limitations": [
    "Sample size not reported in abstract",
    "Exposure frequency not reported (only magnetic flux density and direction described)",
    "In vitro plant model; findings may not generalize beyond this experimental system"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.74,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "magnetic flux density",
    "magnetic field direction",
    "mT",
    "potato plantlets",
    "in vitro culture",
    "growth",
    "CO2 exchange rate",
    "CO2 uptake"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": []
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.1996.440.106
PubMed: 11541587

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library