A randomized trial of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, cisplatin and epirubicin (PELF) versus 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and etoposide (ELF) given as adjuvant chemotherapy to patients with resected advanced gastric adenocarcinomas.
← Research streamIn 78 randomized patients (ELF n=37; PELF n=41), median overall survival was 12.3 months with ELF vs 17.2 months with PELF (p=0.01). Median DFS was 17 weeks with ELF vs 35 weeks with PELF (p=0.0004), and 2-year overall survival was 8% vs 24% (p=0.03). No stat…
Study snapshot
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and toxicity between 2 regimens [5 fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin and etoposide (ELF) and 5-FU, leucovorin, cisplatin and epirubicin (PELF)] administered as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy to patients with completely resected advanced gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1998-2002, 78 patients with advanced gastric cancer were randomly assigned to receive 6 cycles of adjuvant ELF or PELF combination chemotherapy after complete surgical tumor resection. Endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival and treatment toxicity. RESULTS: ELF was administered to 37 and PELF to 41 patients. Median overall survival was 12.3 months in the ELF group and 17.2 months in the PELF group (p=0.01), respectively. For the ELF group the median DFS was 17 weeks (range 7-160 weeks), while for the PELF group it was 35 weeks (range 12-172 weeks) (p=0.0004). Two-year overall survival was 8% (3 patients) in the ELF group and 24% (10 patients) in the PELF group (p=0.03). Grade 2 hematologic toxicity occurred in 21% (8 patients) in the ELF group and in 22% (9 patients) in the PELF group (p=0.5) and grade 3 in 29% (11 patients) in the ELF group and in 24% (10 patients) in the PELF group (p=0.2). Grade 2 non-hematologic toxicity was seen in 8% (3 patients) in the ELF group and in 17% (7 patients) in the PELF group (p=0.2). Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity occurred in 29% (11 patients) in the ELF group and in 26.8% (11 patients in the PELF group) (p=0.2). CONCLUSION: PELF combination chemotherapy resulted in DFS and overall survival advantage compared with ELF. No significant differences in hematologic or non-hematologic toxicities between the two groups were registered. PELF is superior to ELF and represents a valid option for the treatment of gastric cancer.
AI evidence extraction
Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.
Main findings
In 78 randomized patients (ELF n=37; PELF n=41), median overall survival was 12.3 months with ELF vs 17.2 months with PELF (p=0.01). Median DFS was 17 weeks with ELF vs 35 weeks with PELF (p=0.0004), and 2-year overall survival was 8% vs 24% (p=0.03). No statistically significant differences in reported grade 2/3 hematologic or non-hematologic toxicities were observed between groups.
Outcomes measured
- Disease-free survival (DFS)
- Overall survival
- Treatment toxicity (hematologic and non-hematologic; grade 2 and grade 3)
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "randomized_trial",
"exposure": {
"band": null,
"source": null,
"frequency_mhz": null,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": null
},
"population": "Patients with completely resected advanced gastric adenocarcinoma receiving postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy",
"sample_size": 78,
"outcomes": [
"Disease-free survival (DFS)",
"Overall survival",
"Treatment toxicity (hematologic and non-hematologic; grade 2 and grade 3)"
],
"main_findings": "In 78 randomized patients (ELF n=37; PELF n=41), median overall survival was 12.3 months with ELF vs 17.2 months with PELF (p=0.01). Median DFS was 17 weeks with ELF vs 35 weeks with PELF (p=0.0004), and 2-year overall survival was 8% vs 24% (p=0.03). No statistically significant differences in reported grade 2/3 hematologic or non-hematologic toxicities were observed between groups.",
"effect_direction": "benefit",
"limitations": [],
"evidence_strength": "high",
"confidence": 0.74,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"gastric adenocarcinoma",
"adjuvant chemotherapy",
"randomized trial",
"5-fluorouracil",
"leucovorin",
"cisplatin",
"epirubicin",
"etoposide",
"overall survival",
"disease-free survival",
"toxicity"
],
"suggested_hubs": []
}AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.
Identifiers and source
DOI: Not supplied
PubMed: 17415824
Related papers
- [Preliminary clinical comparison of HLF and ELF regimen in the treatment of advanced gastric carcinoma in middle-aged and elderly patients]. 2000
- Up-regulation of miR-144 and miR-375 in the human gastric cancer cell line following the exposure to extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields. 2021
- Pulsed magnetic field therapy for osteoarthritis of the knee--a double-blind sham-controlled trial. 2002
- Effects of ELF EMF and cisplatin on mRNA levels of some DNA repair genes 2016
- [Synergistic inhibitory effect of static magnetic field and antitumor drugs on Hepa1-6 cells]. 2015
- Short-term exposure to 50 Hz ELF-EMF alters the cisplatin-induced oxidative response in AT478 murine squamous cell carcinoma cells. 2012