Biological effects of cell-phone radiofrequency waves exposure on fertilization in mice; an in vivo and in vitro study

2018 · Harm · Low evidence

← Research stream
HarmLow evidencePaper 2087

Compared with control, groups exposed 5 h/day, 10 h/day (standby), and 1 h/day (active) had significantly fewer two-cell embryos and significantly more dead embryos. Five hours/day exposure decreased grade-A embryos and increased grade-B/C/D embryos. Ten hour…

Study snapshot

Publicationmanual · 2018
Study typeanimal
Reported directionHarm
Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

Biological effects of cell-phone radiofrequency waves exposure on fertilization in mice; an in vivo and in vitro study Fatehi D, Anjomshoa M, Mohammadi M, Seify M, Rostamzadeh A. Biological effects of cell-phone radiofrequency waves exposure on fertilization in mice; an in vivo and in vitro study. Middle East Fertility Society Journal, 23(2):148-153. June 2018. Abstract Increasing use of cell-phone is one of the most important risk factors for population health. We designed an experimental study aimed at evaluating the effects of cell-phone radiofrequency (RF) waves exposure on fertilization in mice. Two hundred male and female NMRI-mice were used. One hundred males divided in five groups (n = 20) as control and exposed groups. Those irradiated with cell-phone RF in "Standby-mode" 1, 5 and 10 h daily named groups II, III and IV; respectively. Group V irradiated with cell-phone on "Active-mode" one hour daily. After 30 days irradiation, 50 males and 50 females were kept 24 h to assess their embryos. Fifty males were scarified to evaluate both in vitro and in vivo parameters, and 50 females received PMSG & HCG for both quantitative and qualitative evaluation. Comparing groups III, IV and V with control-group showed significantly decreased in the number of two-cell embryos (p = .000); however, a significant increase was found in the number of dead embryos (p = .000). Furthermore, 5 h daily irradiation significantly decreased grade-A embryos (p = .015); while, it significantly increased grade-B, C and D embryos (p-values = 0.026, 0.007, 0.006; respectively). Moreover, comparing groups IV and V to control-group, significant increase was found in pregnancy duration (p = .005, p = .009; respectively). However, in the mentioned groups a significant decrease was seen in number of newborn mice (p = .001, p = .004; respectively). In conclusion our findings showed that the cell-phone radiation can affect development of embryos as well as the number of newborn and pregnancy duration in NMRI-mouse, which might be a significant cause of reproductive failure. Open access paper: sciencedirect.com The applied frequency of the waves was 900 MHz irradiated from a Nokia cell-phone (Nokia 1100, Finland). In case of irradiation, the distance between cell-phone and mouse was 10 cm.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeanimal
Effect directionharm
PopulationNMRI mice (male and female)
Sample size200
ExposureRF · 900 MHz · Standby-mode: 1, 5, or 10 h daily for 30 days; Active-mode: 1 h daily for 30 days
Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 78% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

Compared with control, groups exposed 5 h/day, 10 h/day (standby), and 1 h/day (active) had significantly fewer two-cell embryos and significantly more dead embryos. Five hours/day exposure decreased grade-A embryos and increased grade-B/C/D embryos. Ten hours/day standby and 1 hour/day active exposure increased pregnancy duration and decreased the number of newborn mice.

Outcomes measured

  • number of two-cell embryos
  • number of dead embryos
  • embryo quality grades (A–D)
  • pregnancy duration
  • number of newborn mice

Limitations

  • SAR not reported
  • Exposure characterization limited (e.g., field strength not provided); distance reported as 10 cm
  • Animal model; generalizability to humans not addressed in abstract
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "animal",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "RF",
    "source": "mobile phone",
    "frequency_mhz": 900,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": "Standby-mode: 1, 5, or 10 h daily for 30 days; Active-mode: 1 h daily for 30 days"
  },
  "population": "NMRI mice (male and female)",
  "sample_size": 200,
  "outcomes": [
    "number of two-cell embryos",
    "number of dead embryos",
    "embryo quality grades (A–D)",
    "pregnancy duration",
    "number of newborn mice"
  ],
  "main_findings": "Compared with control, groups exposed 5 h/day, 10 h/day (standby), and 1 h/day (active) had significantly fewer two-cell embryos and significantly more dead embryos. Five hours/day exposure decreased grade-A embryos and increased grade-B/C/D embryos. Ten hours/day standby and 1 hour/day active exposure increased pregnancy duration and decreased the number of newborn mice.",
  "effect_direction": "harm",
  "limitations": [
    "SAR not reported",
    "Exposure characterization limited (e.g., field strength not provided); distance reported as 10 cm",
    "Animal model; generalizability to humans not addressed in abstract"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.78,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "radiofrequency",
    "mobile phone",
    "900 MHz",
    "Nokia 1100",
    "mice",
    "NMRI",
    "fertilization",
    "embryo development",
    "pregnancy duration",
    "newborn count",
    "in vivo",
    "in vitro"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "mobile-phones",
      "weight": 0.9,
      "reason": "Exposure source is a cell phone (900 MHz) with standby/active modes."
    }
  ]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: Not supplied
PubMed: Not supplied

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library