Classification of the Laptop’s Extremely Low Frequency Magnetic Field With Alternating Current and Battery
← Research streamBased on measurements from 10 laptops, the paper reports that the ELF magnetic field value is almost two times higher when laptops are powered by AC compared with battery power. Measurements taken 10 cm away from measurement points were reported to be around …
Study snapshot
Abstract
Classification of the Laptop’s Extremely Low Frequency Magnetic Field With Alternating Current and Battery Dejan Tanikić, Alessia Amelio. Classification of the Laptop’s Extremely Low Frequency Magnetic Field With Alternating Current and Battery. 2021 20th International Symposium INFOTEH-JAHORINA (INFOTEH). 17-19 March 2021.DOI: 10.1109/INFOTEH51037.2021.9400677 Abstract The magnetic field exposure of the laptop users represents an important task to be researched. This paper proposes an artificial neural network model for the prediction of the extremely low-frequency magnetic field produced by laptops. It is based on measurement data of 10 laptops and a 3-input vector representing typical laptop characteristics. The novelty of the proposed model is that it is created in order to predict the level of the magnetic field emission produced by a laptop when it is powered by both alternating current and battery. Then, the obtained data are classified by the self-organizing map method to describe the safe or dangerous level of a laptop. At the end, a few suggestions are proposed for a safer use of the laptops. ieeexplore.ieee.org Excerpts The magnetic field is measured at 18 measurement points in the laptop’s neighbourhood. These points are at the top (T1…T9) and at the bottom (B1…B9) of the laptop [6], [10]. Also, we measured the magnetic field 10 cm away from the proposed measurement points, i.e. outside the laptops. The obtained levels of the magnetic field were around or below 0.01 μT. Hence, they can be considered as a background magnetic field. The general conclusion is that the value of the magnetic field is almost 2 times higher when the laptops are AC powered. The predicted values of the magnetic field of the 10 laptops were used to divide the laptops in 5 (4) clusters, which represent the grade of the magnetic field of each laptop. Furthermore, if we compare the ELF magnetic field emission and the classes extracted by the clustering process, we can obtain the results given in Tables 3–4 for AC and battery powered laptops, respectively. This paper proposed a new ANN model for estimating the ELF magnetic field emission based on the measurement of 10 laptops. The measurement of the magnetic field was performed at the top and at the bottom of each laptop which was AC and battery powered. Then, from the ANN predicted data, a SOM based clustering was performed. The obtained classification was used to clearly define a level ranking of the laptops according to their ELF magnetic field emission. In the end, important suggestions for a safer use of the laptops were proposed. In the future, we are planning to extend the analysis to the tablet devices
AI evidence extraction
Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.
Main findings
Based on measurements from 10 laptops, the paper reports that the ELF magnetic field value is almost two times higher when laptops are powered by AC compared with battery power. Measurements taken 10 cm away from measurement points were reported to be around or below 0.01 μT and considered background. The authors used ANN-predicted values and SOM clustering to classify laptops into emission-level clusters described as safe or dangerous.
Outcomes measured
- Extremely low-frequency (ELF) magnetic field levels around laptops
- Predicted ELF magnetic field emission using an artificial neural network (ANN) model
- Classification/clustering of laptops into emission level categories (safe/dangerous) using self-organizing maps (SOM)
- Comparison of ELF magnetic field levels when powered by alternating current (AC) vs battery
Limitations
- Small number of laptops measured (10).
- No health outcomes were assessed; the work focuses on exposure measurement/prediction and classification.
- Details of the criteria/thresholds for "safe" vs "dangerous" are not provided in the abstract/excerpts.
- Frequency characteristics of the ELF field are not specified in the provided text.
View raw extracted JSON
{
"publication_year": 2021,
"study_type": "exposure_assessment",
"exposure": {
"band": "ELF",
"source": "laptop",
"frequency_mhz": null,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": null
},
"population": "Laptop users (exposure context); measurements on 10 laptops",
"sample_size": 10,
"outcomes": [
"Extremely low-frequency (ELF) magnetic field levels around laptops",
"Predicted ELF magnetic field emission using an artificial neural network (ANN) model",
"Classification/clustering of laptops into emission level categories (safe/dangerous) using self-organizing maps (SOM)",
"Comparison of ELF magnetic field levels when powered by alternating current (AC) vs battery"
],
"main_findings": "Based on measurements from 10 laptops, the paper reports that the ELF magnetic field value is almost two times higher when laptops are powered by AC compared with battery power. Measurements taken 10 cm away from measurement points were reported to be around or below 0.01 μT and considered background. The authors used ANN-predicted values and SOM clustering to classify laptops into emission-level clusters described as safe or dangerous.",
"effect_direction": "mixed",
"limitations": [
"Small number of laptops measured (10).",
"No health outcomes were assessed; the work focuses on exposure measurement/prediction and classification.",
"Details of the criteria/thresholds for \"safe\" vs \"dangerous\" are not provided in the abstract/excerpts.",
"Frequency characteristics of the ELF field are not specified in the provided text."
],
"evidence_strength": "low",
"confidence": 0.74,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"stance": "neutral",
"stance_confidence": 0.62,
"summary": "This study measured extremely low-frequency magnetic fields around 10 laptops and developed an artificial neural network model to predict laptop ELF magnetic field emission under AC and battery power. The authors report that magnetic field values were almost twice as high when laptops were AC powered, while measurements 10 cm away were around or below 0.01 μT (treated as background). Predicted values were clustered using self-organizing maps to rank laptops into emission-level categories described as safe or dangerous.",
"key_points": [
"The paper focuses on assessing and predicting ELF magnetic field emissions from laptops.",
"Measurements were taken at 18 points (top and bottom) around each laptop, plus measurements 10 cm away.",
"Magnetic field levels 10 cm away were reported around or below 0.01 μT and considered background.",
"The authors report ELF magnetic field values were almost 2× higher when laptops were powered by AC versus battery.",
"An ANN model was proposed to predict ELF magnetic field emission based on measurement data and a 3-input vector of laptop characteristics.",
"Self-organizing map clustering was used to classify laptops into emission-level clusters described as safe or dangerous.",
"The paper mentions providing suggestions for safer laptop use."
],
"categories": [
"Exposure Assessment",
"Consumer Devices",
"ELF Magnetic Fields",
"Modeling & AI"
],
"tags": [
"Laptop",
"Extremely Low Frequency",
"Magnetic Field",
"Alternating Current Power",
"Battery Power",
"Exposure Measurement",
"Artificial Neural Network",
"Self-Organizing Map",
"Clustering",
"User Exposure"
],
"keywords": [
"laptop",
"ELF",
"magnetic field",
"AC powered",
"battery powered",
"ANN",
"SOM",
"measurement points",
"classification",
"exposure"
],
"suggested_hubs": [],
"social": {
"tweet": "Study measured ELF magnetic fields around 10 laptops and built an ANN model to predict emissions under AC vs battery power. Reported fields were ~2× higher on AC, while measurements 10 cm away were ~≤0.01 μT (background). Laptops were clustered into emission-level categories using SOM.",
"facebook": "Researchers measured extremely low-frequency magnetic fields around 10 laptops and proposed an AI (ANN) model to predict emissions when laptops run on AC power versus battery. They report fields were almost twice as high on AC, and that measurements 10 cm away were around or below 0.01 μT (background). Predicted values were clustered to rank laptops by emission level.",
"linkedin": "Conference paper: ELF magnetic fields were measured around 10 laptops and used to train an ANN model to predict emissions under AC and battery power. The authors report ~2× higher fields on AC and ~≤0.01 μT at 10 cm (background), then applied SOM clustering to classify laptops by emission level."
}
}AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.
Identifiers and source
DOI: 10.1109/infoteh51037.2021.9400677
PubMed: Not supplied
Related papers
- Self-organizing maps classification with application to the low-frequency magnetic field emitted by portable computers 2017
- Magnetic fields produced by subsea high-voltage direct current cables reduce swimming activity of haddock larvae 2022
- Exposure to Magnetic Fields Changes the Behavioral Pattern in Honeybees under Laboratory Conditions 2022
- Effects of power-frequency MF on cardiomyocytes differentiated from human induced pluripotent stem cells 2017
- EMF Seems to Not Influence Transcription via CTCT Motif in Three Plant Promoters 2017
- 15 Hz square wave magnetic fields affects voltage-gated sodium & potassium channels in neurons 2016