30 Hz, Could It Be Part of a Window Frequency for Cellular Response? (Review)

2021 · Mixed · Low evidence

← Research stream
MixedLow evidencePaper 1173

The authors report that across their studies using combinations of extremely low frequencies, exposure times, and field intensities, cell viability in glioblastoma cells was frequency dependent. They suggest that 30 Hz (and nearby frequencies) could represent…

Study snapshot

Publicationmanual · 2021
Study typereview
Reported directionMixed
Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

30 Hz, Could It Be Part of a Window Frequency for Cellular Response? (Review) Olga García-Minguillán, Ceferino Maestú. 30 Hz, Could It Be Part of a Window Frequency for Cellular Response? Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Mar 31;22(7):3642. doi: 10.3390/ijms22073642 Abstract Many exogenous and endogenous risk factors have been proposed as precursors of brain tumors, including the exposure to non-ionizing electromagnetic fields. Nevertheless, there is still a debate among the scientific community about the hazard of the effects produced by non-ionizing radiation (NIR) because conflicting results have been found (number of articles reviewed >50). For that reason, to provide new evidence on the possible effects produced by exposure to NIR, we performed different studies with several combinations of extremely low frequencies, times, and field intensities in tumoral and non-tumoral cells. The results of our studies showed that cell viability was frequency dependent in glioblastoma cells. In fact, our results revealed that a frequency of 30 Hz-or even other frequencies close to 30 Hz-could constitute a window frequency determinant of the cellular response in tumoral and non-tumoral cells. Open access paper: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typereview
Effect directionmixed
PopulationTumoral and non-tumoral cells (including glioblastoma cells)
Sample sizeNot supplied
ExposureELF
Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 66% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

The authors report that across their studies using combinations of extremely low frequencies, exposure times, and field intensities, cell viability in glioblastoma cells was frequency dependent. They suggest that 30 Hz (and nearby frequencies) could represent a "window frequency" influencing cellular responses in tumoral and non-tumoral cells.

Outcomes measured

  • Cell viability
  • Cellular response (frequency dependence)

Limitations

  • Conflicting results in the broader literature are noted by the authors.
  • Specific exposure parameters (field intensity, timing) are not detailed in the abstract.
  • The abstract does not describe study selection methods or quality assessment typical of systematic reviews.
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "publication_year": 2021,
  "study_type": "review",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "ELF",
    "source": null,
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": "Tumoral and non-tumoral cells (including glioblastoma cells)",
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "Cell viability",
    "Cellular response (frequency dependence)"
  ],
  "main_findings": "The authors report that across their studies using combinations of extremely low frequencies, exposure times, and field intensities, cell viability in glioblastoma cells was frequency dependent. They suggest that 30 Hz (and nearby frequencies) could represent a \"window frequency\" influencing cellular responses in tumoral and non-tumoral cells.",
  "effect_direction": "mixed",
  "limitations": [
    "Conflicting results in the broader literature are noted by the authors.",
    "Specific exposure parameters (field intensity, timing) are not detailed in the abstract.",
    "The abstract does not describe study selection methods or quality assessment typical of systematic reviews."
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.66,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "stance": "concern",
  "stance_confidence": 0.62,
  "summary": "This review discusses potential cellular effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields, noting ongoing scientific debate and conflicting findings in the literature. The authors summarize their own experimental work using extremely low frequencies and report frequency-dependent changes in glioblastoma cell viability. They propose that 30 Hz (and nearby frequencies) may act as a window frequency affecting cellular responses in tumoral and non-tumoral cells.",
  "key_points": [
    "The paper frames non-ionizing electromagnetic fields as a debated potential risk factor for brain tumors.",
    "The authors state they reviewed more than 50 articles and highlight conflicting results in the field.",
    "They report results from their own studies varying extremely low frequencies, exposure times, and field intensities in cell models.",
    "Glioblastoma cell viability is reported to be frequency dependent in their experiments.",
    "The authors suggest 30 Hz (and nearby frequencies) could be a window frequency influencing cellular responses.",
    "Details on exposure levels and experimental conditions are not provided in the abstract."
  ],
  "categories": [
    "Extremely Low Frequency (ELF)",
    "In Vitro",
    "Cancer/Biology",
    "Mechanisms"
  ],
  "tags": [
    "30 Hz",
    "Window Frequency",
    "Extremely Low Frequency Fields",
    "Non-Ionizing Radiation",
    "Cell Viability",
    "Glioblastoma Cells",
    "Tumoral Cells",
    "In Vitro Study",
    "Frequency Dependence"
  ],
  "keywords": [
    "30 Hz",
    "window frequency",
    "extremely low frequency",
    "non-ionizing electromagnetic fields",
    "cell viability",
    "glioblastoma"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [],
  "social": {
    "tweet": "Review: authors report frequency-dependent effects of extremely low-frequency EMF on glioblastoma cell viability and suggest ~30 Hz may act as a “window frequency” for cellular responses. (Int J Mol Sci, 2021)",
    "facebook": "A 2021 review discusses debated health effects of non-ionizing EMF and summarizes the authors’ cell studies reporting frequency-dependent changes in glioblastoma viability, proposing ~30 Hz as a possible “window frequency.”",
    "linkedin": "In a 2021 Int J Mol Sci review, the authors summarize literature and their own in vitro studies, reporting frequency-dependent effects in glioblastoma cell viability and proposing ~30 Hz as a potential window frequency for cellular response."
  }
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.3390/ijms22073642
PubMed: Not supplied

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library