All HHS comments · page 49

I’m very concerned about wireless radiation and all of the radiation from “smart” devices. Even if I hard wire. Y home and turn off what I can in my home there are still multiple WiFi systems from my neighbors affecting us. There needs to be much more oversight and regulation of EMF a push to move to hard wiring and limiting the use of “smart” meters by utility companies.

I am an ordinary citizen who has been harmed by EMF radio since 2014 when a smart meter was attached to my house. I suffer from tinnitus because of it and the power company refused to uninstall it. EMF radiation is known to cause this condition. I ask that the harms of EMF radiation be independently studied because I know that it can cause many other health issues.

See attached file(s)

Attached are the comments of the Michigan Coalition to Protect Public Rights-of-Way (PROTEC).

Through the 5G network, they know the frequencies that can kil anybody at any time. 5G covers 5 gigahertz but also goes up to 100 gigahertz. Cell towers can give people respiratory problems. 60 gigahertz resonates with the red blood cells in your body. A frequency interferes with your hemoblobin and the oxygen uptake. To the point where you are not able to breathe or get oxygen. They can and do remote execution of living beings for population control through the electromagnetic system of cell towers. plenty of sciencitiv evidence of this capability is available.

1. & 2. I am responding as: an individual 3a. Type of wireless or RF/EMF sources involved (e.g., mobile phones, Wi-Fi, smart meters…)Wi-Fi and mobile phones 3b. Nature, duration, frequency, and approximate timing (e.g., years):Exposure frequency is every day. One can't get away from this type of micro radiation. So it's been years of exposure. 3c. Adverse health effect(s) experienced:Fatigue, brain fog, memory, mood changes like agitation, irritability and more easily angered, and in particular, disruption in sleep. Effects are more noticeable in an environment where there are more concentrated EMF's like in a hotel, office buildings, malls, apartment buildings, etc. 3d. Time from first exposure to first appearance of adverse health effects; and did a change in exposure coincide with the onset of adverse effects:Probably a number of years of exposure before I realized the negative effects EMF's were having on me. Sleep disruption, more difficult to fall asleep and stay asleep, was the main effect I noticed. 3e. Was medical evaluation or treatment sought? (Optionally:) Was there a diagnosis?No. I did research on exposure effects to humans. 3f. Were steps taken to reduce or eliminate exposure, and were there subsequent changes in the effects?We had our bedroom configured to be able to turn off the electricity at night, which also turns off our router. Sleep improvements were immediate. I sleep much better with this arrangement. 3g. Any supporting documentation? This includes Scientific Reports, exposure measurements, or other relevant information:https://greenmedinfo.com/content/emfs-linked-cancer-autoimmunity-immune-dysfunction https://jackkruse.com/emf-5-what-are-the-biologic-effects-of-emf/ https://worldcouncilforhealth.substack.com/p/new-paper-identifies-smoking-gun?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1135210&post_id=157821523&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=2b987c&triedRedirect=true Additional Details you would like to share about your experiences of adverse health effects you believe to be associated with exposure to wireless radiation or EMF's: B1a. Sources you experience as causing you Adverse Effects:Wifi, blue tooth, cell phone…

Read the full comment →

RE: Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure

Docket: HHS-OASH-2026-0397

Department of Health and Human Services:

Please find attached an official letter from NATE: The Communications Infrastructure Contractors Association (NATE) outlining our organization's comments on the Department of Health and Human Services RFI on EMF's, RF Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure.

Thank you.

I am a mother in Arizona his children have been impacted by emfs and Wireless Communications. My son is so sensitive even to microwaves and it impacts his health I know a lot of us have toxic overload of everything in our environments maybe it's not one thing but it's two or three things that are breaking the Children's Health. Please do the research on this and limit it from our communities

This Substack article suggests that data centers contribute to health issues through "dirty electricity" and more.

https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-is-making-people-near-data-centers

Seems relevant as they have a high power consumption. And there are other stories about powerlines, subsea cables and power stations influencing people and animals.

This Substack article suggests that data centers contribute to health issues through "dirty electricity" and more.

https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-is-making-people-near-data-centers

Seems relevant as they have a high power consumption. And there are other stories about powerlines, subsea cables and power stations influencing people and animals.

This recommendation focuses on a specific loophole in current standards of electromagnetic exposure that is being exploited by specific foreign-built consumer grade electronics to express a comprehensive approach to ensuring operating safety for the end-user consumer in the United States. Current standards mainly focus on intentional electromagnetic radiators such as smart phones at cellular frequencies or tablets at Wi-Fi frequencies. These intentional radiators are combined with a charger or AC/DC adapter which adhere to a poorly defined and poorly enforced FCC Class B standard for unintentional radiation. The integration of foreign manufactured components into the final consumer product sidesteps individual component testing. Foreign electronics manufacturers intentionally alter the electromagnetic signals emanating from components to prevent accurate measurements from foreign accredited testing laboratories that are selectively testing to low standards. With the recent technological shift to faster switching semiconductors and burst mode charging capability combined with poor end-user habits, emanations from cheap foreign handheld consumer electronics with biologically unsafe signatures create a health risk to Americans.

Life altering.. 4+ yrs HENIOUS ATTACK ON CITIZEN'S..UNFRIENDLY TO LIFE.. Seniors,, Military family.. WE KEPT

Maintenance RECORDS. when FREQUENCY POWER OFF LOUD TINNITUS STOPS ..UNTIL ON AGAIN..

NO DRIVING, PRAYING NO CONCENTRATION. NO GARDEN GROW

I am a Licensed Electrician and perform EMF Mitigation for private residences. I received training through the Building Biology Institute and am in process to be certified through BBI as an Electromagnetic Radiation Specialist. For the past 6 years I have measured and mitigated electromagnetic fields in homes with a primary focus on sleeping areas. My work is guided by the Building Biology Evaluation Guidelines, which are based on the precautionary principle and the goal of creating environments that support long-term health rather than merely avoiding acute thermal injury. I appreciate HHS’s initiative to examine RF/EMF exposures, particularly as they affect children and other vulnerable populations. There exists a large gap between U.S. standards and precautionary guidelines. U.S. and ICNIRP standards are based almost exclusively on heating (thermal) effects. A substantial body of peer-reviewed research documents non-thermal biological effects at levels far below those limits. Mechanisms repeatedly discussed in the literature and observed in practice include activation of voltage-gated calcium channels leading to oxidative stress, disruption of melatonin and circadian rhythms, DNA damage, increased blood-brain barrier permeability, and effects on sperm and reproductive tissue. From my professional experience, the most consistent and rapidly reversible effects are on sleep quality and overnight recovery. Clients frequently report improvements in sleep, energy, headaches, heart palpitations, cognitive clarity, and skin sensations after reduction of nighttime exposures, even when daytime exposures remain largely unchanged. These observations align with the emphasis Building Biology places on sleeping areas. Children are of particular concern. Their thinner skulls, higher tissue conductivity, developing nervous and immune systems, and longer cumulative lifetime exposure increase vulnerability. I regularly encounter elevated RF and AC electric/magnetic fields in children’s bedrooms from Wi-Fi routers, baby monitors, cordless phones, cell phones, tablets, gaming devices, smart meters, and poorly designed electrical wiring. Building Biology Evaluation Guidelines…

Read the full comment →

Danke, ich hoffe, es hilft

I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure.

I am responding from the perspective of a parent and friend. Wireless radiation has affected someone I care about. Her experiences have affected daily life and relationships terribly. Wireless radiation isn't safe and HHS should address this issue.

I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence.

I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health.

Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.

Please read the attached document.

I submit this comment as a 27-year-old resident of France who has experienced localized physiological and neurological symptoms associated with ambient and near-field electromagnetic environments since early 2021. My experience highlights the importance of assessing whether current regulatory standards adequately address real-world exposure conditions and individual sensitivities. Firstly of all, current testing protocols often assess wireless devices under controlled conditions that may not fully reflect simultaneous use of GPS, cellular data, and Wi-Fi. Such multi-radio activity can affect device power consumption, heat generation, and exposure levels. I therefore encourage the Commission to evaluate simultaneous transmissions in realistic operating and handling conditions when reviewing Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) and power-density standards. Relevant industry developments, including U.S. Patent No. US20120231784A1, illustrate the technical challenges of managing emissions in multi-radio systems. Secondly, exposure assessments should also consider the broader environmental context. Atmospheric electricity, temperature, low-frequency fields, and device-generated noise may coexist in everyday settings. Although their combined physiological effects require further investigation, I encourage the Commission to support research into potential interactions between environmental factors and neurological responses, including symptoms reported by sensitive individuals. Thirdly, metal enclosures such as trains, subways, elevators, and vehicle cabins can affect signal reception and prompt mobile devices to adjust transmission power. These changing conditions may produce exposure patterns not adequately represented by averaged outdoor measurements. Testing should therefore include realistic indoor and enclosed transport environments, transient transmission peaks, and common device-use positions. Furthermore, building materials, architectural design, and local topography can also influence radiofrequency distribution. Masonry may attenuate signals, while windows, upper floors, and reflections from nearby structures can create variations in indoor exposure. I encourage…

Read the full comment →

I am submitting this comment as a consumer concerned about long-term exposure to wireless radiation from phones, Wi-Fi routers, cell towers, and other connected devices.

I urge HHS to conduct a thorough, independent review of whether current exposure limits adequately protect public health. This review needs to consider those most heavily exposed and should examine potential effects beyond tissue heating, including evidence concerning cancer, reproductive health, and children’s development.

Please prioritize research that reflects how people actually encounter wireless radiation: repeated exposure over many years, often from multiple sources and devices used close to the body. Assessments should consider signal strength, pulse patterns, duration, and combined exposure.

Please consider Melnick and Moskowitz’s 2026 analysis of animal data, which argues that existing exposure limits may inadequately protect against cancer and reproductive harm (https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-026-01288-6). I also ask HHS to evaluate Lai and Levitt’s review of exposure intensity, duration, and signal modulation (https://doi.org/10.1080/15368378.2022.2065683), and Scarato’s review of US regulatory gaps and proposed reforms (https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1677583). These papers warrant careful consideration alongside the broader evidence, including studies that have not found adverse effects.

I ask HHS to:

•Assess whether additional protections are needed for children, pregnant women, and other potentially vulnerable groups.

•Support long-term research with safeguards against industry conflicts of interest.

•Provide clear information about exposure and practical ways to reduce it, including wired alternatives in homes and schools.

•Recommend updated standards wherever the evidence shows that existing limits are insufficient.

Consumers should not have to navigate these questions alone. Please use this inquiry to advance transparent science, meaningful oversight, and public health protection.

It is time to stop letting the RF dangers just because a human cannot see them go without great concerns.

When was the last time a full report was done with all the tower sites and the monster antennas feeding the wireless cancer product.

This is still OUR PUBLIC AIRWAYS and just because it has not been reported the death toll is happening.

What about this WAR What About Radiation.

I have since November of 1999 been a watchdog who made a different of this 1996 Telecommuting Act of 1996

Be the Government that Controls too much, too fast and to many.

With Great Concerns

Karen Johnson Leuthner it is this generation to save the next Can you hear me now?

1. & 2. I am responding as: an individual

3a. Type of wireless or RF/EMF sources involved (e.g., mobile phones, Wi-Fi, smart meters…)Cell phone towers, 4G/5G network signals. wi-fi, mobile phones. ALL RF/EMF sources

3b. Nature, duration, frequency, and approximate timing (e.g., years):At least ten years of involuntary exposure to wi-fi in workplace, network signals and neighbours' wi-fi etc in living environment. Network signal in all urban environments and now all rural locations. Affected 24/7.

3c. Adverse health effect(s) experienced:Tinnitus 24/7. Headache, inner ear pain in close proximity to any wireless device particulary wifi router or someone's phone / "smart" device. Brain fog, sometimes severe, can only perform simplest tasks when affected. Memory loss/ focusing/ concentration/ word finding difficulties. Regular periods of depression and anxiety/anger/irritability. sleep disturbance. Chest tightness, "fight or flight" panic response. Prostate issues. Exhaustion/daily fatigue. Effects are cumulative.

3d. Time from first exposure to first appearance of adverse health effects; and did a change in exposure coincide with the onset of adverse effects:When wi-fi began being installed in the multiple locations I had to work in. Direct and immediate correlation with symptoms and adverse health effects. Adverse health effects increasing with addition of all new wireless infrastructure in my local environment.

3e. Was medical evaluation or treatment sought? (Optionally:) Was there a diagnosis?More than one medical doctor's diagnosis sought. Eventually (correctly) diagnosed with electromagnetic hypersensitivity.

3f. Were steps taken to reduce or eliminate exposure, and were there subsequent changes in the effects?Spending time in very remote rural areas with little or no mobile network signal/infrastructure/wi-fi/other people's devices etc (now no longer acheiveable) Eventual complete disappearance of all adverse health effects. Sleeping in a shielding canopy- some mitigation of most symptoms. Shielded some walls in home to reduce neighbour's wireless pollution, otherwise impossible to spend time in own home.