7,080 public comments, newest first, 20 per page. Keep scrolling to load more.
*See attached for comments.
*See attached for comments.
*See attached for comments.
*See attached for comments.
*See attached for comments.
*See attached for comments.
Describes attached IEEE exposure guidelines and technical corrections, requests comparison with European standards, and relates reported 5G complaints to anomalous health incidents. The attachment is unread.
See attached file(s) IEEE Standards Association's 2019 guidelines to Human Exposure t
y similar to the now widely recognized "Havana Syndrome" or Anomalous Health Incidents.
h effects believe to be originated from 5G towers. Complaints are very similar to the now widely recognized
See attached file(s)
IEEE Standards Association's 2019 guidelines to Human Exposure to EMF. Small edits were added in 2022 called "Corrigendum 2". Corrigendum 2 was appended to the standard as of June 29, 2022. This corrigendum addressed technical corrections, specifically fixing Figure 1 and Figure 2 in the original 2019 document which were found to be incorrect. Corrigendum 1 (C95.1-2019/Cor 1-2019) was incorporated directly into the 2019 publication and did not appear as a separate standalone standard. The core exposure limits and scientific basis established in the 2019 edition remain the active standard, with these corrigenda serving as necessary technical amendments to the documentation.
2019 IEEE Standards Association's guidelines remain the standard of safety reference still currently being used in the United States. Other countries however have their stricter safety standards applying to EMF exposure levels. France for example has more stringent safety standards and it is rumored that one of the latest iPhone models is banned from retail sale due to being too powerful and operates higher than European safety standards.
Please have your professional staff reference the 2019 IEEE guidelines attached, I'm sure the staff has seen/heard of this standard before. Also ask staff to explore the safety standards in other European nations. With the rollout of 5G cellular networks in European states/countries, also came the beginnings of physical and mental health effects believe to be originated from 5G towers. Complaints are very similar to the now widely recognized "Havana Syndrome" or Anomalous Health Incidents.
Proposes that interactions between biological electromagnetic fields and Earth’s lightning resonance govern oxidative stress and argues that research must account for these proposed interactions.
d is responsible for the enforcement of oxidative stress originating from biomagnetic/bioelectromagnetic emissions t
logy. In sum: you will *not* be able to quantify the effect of an artificial magnetic/electromagnetic field
You need to start your hypothesis with the fact that all biological bodies radiate a biomagnetic/bioelectromagnetic field the electromagnetic interference of which modulates the physiological capacity of the life emitting it and all lives exposed to such. The biomagnetic/bioelectromagnetic field extends outward infinitely from a body and saturates the planet's field such that any one life on the planet is permanently exposed to the biomagnetism/bioelectromagnetism of every other life on the planet. Furthermore you need to understand that Earth's/Gaia's lightning resonance field is responsible for the enforcement of oxidative stress originating from biomagnetic/bioelectromagnetic emissions that are phase-misaligned & destructively interfering with its field; to word this another way - all biomagnetic/bioelectromagnetic activity - and therefore any artificial magnetism/electromagnetism that is brought into existence by it is bound primarily by the biomagnetic/bioelectromagnetic activity that is driving its "production" - are governed by Earth's/Gaia's oxidative stress-stabilizing lightning resonance field. Key to understand regarding this is that the primary issue is with psychophysiologically-bound behavior, sentiment, tone, and attitude that is assocated with modes of thought that are destructively interfering & non-globally resonant in nature and therefore do not recruit the oxidative stress-stabilizing effects provided by Earth's/Gaia's lightning resonance field. What you must understand is that the effect you are "concerned about" - which may be known as biological oxidative stress or biological free radical emission - have only a second order dependence on the underlying electromagnetic interference of the biomagnetism/bioelectromagnetism involved which contain the first order effects. You must understand that it is the very thought to develop & brainwaves involved in developing artificial magnetism/electromagnetism that is phase-misaligned & destructively interfering with earth's/gaia's oxidative stress-stabilizing lightning resonance field and which therefore poses the most significant threat to bodily physiology. In sum: you will *not* be able to…
Alleges psychotronic targeting, describes high perceived exposure from nearby wireless sources and use of protective items, and seeks help relocating to a lower-exposure environment.
5 postal code 821312. . I'm a victim of psychotronic by singapore ministry of health, living in a flat with lots
f health, living in a flat with lots of wifi users and staaying near a cell phone tower therefore i'm ex
utside. I'm hoping to get help seeking refugee in a less polluted environment. I can be contacted at +65 8
Hello, my name is zhang taisheng, ic number s7728964z and i'm located in singapore
address blk 312a sumang link #15-195 postal code 821312.
.
I'm a victim of psychotronic by singapore ministry of health, living in a flat with lots of wifi users and staaying near a cell phone tower therefore i'm expose
to high amount of emf. It's so harmful that i had to wear emf protective items at home and outside.
I'm hoping to get help seeking refugee in a less polluted environment. I can be contacted at +65 82034403.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide my input on this important topic. Please see my comments attached below (HHS EMF.pdf).
States that convincing scientific evidence does not show harm from exposure within established safety limits.
there is no convincing scientific evidence that exposure within established safety limits causes harm
idence that exposure within established safety limits causes harm to humans
there is no convincing scientific evidence that exposure within established safety limits causes harm to humans
Reports tinnitus and headaches resolving after replacing Wi-Fi with cables and quotes a Danish legal opinion arguing that 5G deployment conflicts with human-rights and environmental protections; the full attached opinion is unread.
l: Based on my personal experience with Wi-Fi and my concerns regarding potential health effects associat
ee days, I woke up with an overwhelming tinnitus and pressure headache. I wondered for a day why this had su
i. I managed to cut the Wi-Fi and get a cabled solution instead. After 4-5 hours in a Wi-Fi free environm
Whether it would be in Contravention of Human Rights and Environmental Law to Establish the 5G System in Denmark
alth of humans (particularly children), animals and plants. This also applies when the radiation remains within the li
s to the health of humans (particularly children), animals and plants. This also applies when the radiation
I am submitting these comments in two capacities: 1. As an individual: Based on my personal experience with Wi-Fi and my concerns regarding potential health effects associated with wireless radiation. 2. As a board member of The Civil Health Rights Movement May Day, Denmark: My comments also draw on a legal opinion obtained in 2019 concerning the deployment of 5G in Denmark. The legal opinion references numerous scientific studies. I have included its conclusion below and attached the full document for reference. 1) Individual consumer Question 3 Seven years ago, I spent approximately six hours a day working at my computer for about a week on a major project at my summer house. I had just received a new router (TP-Link) for my fiber net and was very happy that the whole set-up worked so well out in the middle of nowhere. I was writing on my computer and the Wi-Fi was on as I had to be in constant communication with several people all over the country, and I was well connected. Then after three days, I woke up with an overwhelming tinnitus and pressure headache. I wondered for a day why this had suddenly come and then I realized it was probably the radiation from the Wi-Fi. I managed to cut the Wi-Fi and get a cabled solution instead. After 4-5 hours in a Wi-Fi free environment and a walk by the beach, the tinnitus was gone and since then I have experienced the same on tests: 2-3 days in a Wi-Fi environment and the tinnitus and headache turns on. Now everything in my house is cabled. No medical doctor or medicine was involved. No measurements were done at the time. 2) Member of The Civil Health Rights Movement May Day, board member (Denmark) Question 12 and 18 I would like to draw attention to a legal opinion entitled LEGAL OPINION on Whether it would be in Contravention of Human Rights and Environmental Law to Establish the 5G System in Denmark obtained in 2019 by May Day and other stakeholders in Denmark. The opinion examines scientific studies relating to potential health and environmental effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation, including exposure within the limits recommended by ICNIRP. The conclusion of the legal opinion is reproduced below.…
Describes discovery of a nearby Canadian small cell, concerns about exposure and sensitivity, and objections to installation without resident or local-government consultation.
ound 2 meter and went out and found the small cell located on a telephone pole at the end of street. The readi
d the government while harming us. I am sensitive to EMF and would have had to move if they had installed next to me
to me. The fact that the residents had no warning and were not given any opportunity to speak out is shameful
I live in a small Canadian town that did not have 5G. Suddenly the 5G icon appeared on my work issued phone and I knew that it had been activated here without any warning or consultations. I grabbed my Safe and Sound 2 meter and went out and found the small cell located on a telephone pole at the end of street. The readings on my meter were in the "Extreme" range which means you should immediately leave the area. My house is about 150 ft from the small cell which is located between 2 residential homes, one of which has young children.
I took a picture of it and sent it to my city council office.
They didn't even know what it was or who it belonged to. After a 2 week investigation, they reported back that it was the property of a local internet provider Rogers Communications.
Next, a neighbour contacted me to ask about a truck with a 50 foot antenna that was parked in front of my house while I was at work. This turned out to be a test being run by the Canadian Federal Government Communications Research Centre to "check levels". My house is about 150 ft from the small cell which is located between 2 residential homes, one of which has young children.
The fact that the residents and city councilman were not even made aware that these small cells were being installed is outrageous. He said it's because telecommunications are under the Federal Government's responsibility.
One of the homes beside it is now up for sale and the 2 homes beside
That have already sold. It does seem odd that 3 homes in a row would all sell at the same time but now I'm speculating.
I do everything I can to protect myself from the well known health hazards of EMF. That could have been installed outside me bedroom window and I would have had no say. This is deplorable! This technology and infrastructure is very dangerous and does not benefit those who have to live in its vicinity. It benefits corporations and the government while harming us. I am sensitive to EMF and would have had to move if they had installed next to me.
The fact that the residents had no warning and were not given any opportunity to speak out is shameful government overreach especially when we know that safe levels of exposure have not even been established or properly tested for health. Profit over people is unacceptable and needs to be stopped.
Reports household symptoms and meter readings associated with small-cell upgrades and solar equipment, difficulty finding low-exposure housing, and requests setbacks, disclosure, research and clinical guidance.
a. Sources: wireless infrastructure (a small-cell node that was later replaced with a much larger unit), and
d with a much larger unit), and rooftop solar systems on rental homes. b. Exposure: Over several years, w
oth experienced increased inflammation, migraines and headaches, hormonal imbalance, trouble sleeping, fatigu
in the ears, skin tingling or burning, heart palpitations, dizziness, irritability and anxiety, and joint and muscle
improve. Since the larger node went in, finding low-exposure housing has been a constant struggle, especially in the DC area. Qu
ext to homes. That includes enforceable setbacks from bedrooms and living spaces. Question 9 (Disclosure): R
oom by thousands of times. Question 16 (Research priorities): Which frequency bands, signal types, and exposure levels
Re: Docket HHS-OASH-2026-0397, Request for Information on EMF/RF Exposure Question 2 (Perspective): I'm responding as an individual and family member. My husband and I are adults in our fifties who have dealt with RF exposure in our homes for many years. This response is based on our personal experience and our own measurements taken with a consumer RF meter. Question 3 (Experiences): a. Sources: wireless infrastructure (a small-cell node that was later replaced with a much larger unit), and rooftop solar systems on rental homes. b. Exposure: Over several years, we reduced RF in our Los Angeles bedroom to about 1 to 5 µW/m². Then the small-cell node outside our apartment was replaced with a unit about the size of a refrigerator. Our meter then read about 10,000 µW/m² in our living room and 30,000 µW/m² on our front step. In later rentals with rooftop solar, we measured very high readings in the bedroom. c/d. Health effects and timing: We both experienced increased inflammation, migraines and headaches, hormonal imbalance, trouble sleeping, fatigue, brain fog and difficulty concentrating, a persistent buzzing sensation and ringing in the ears, skin tingling or burning, heart palpitations, dizziness, irritability and anxiety, and joint and muscle aches. These began to ease once we reduced our bedroom exposure to 1 to 5 µW/m², and they returned after the larger node was installed. We now rent a home with rooftop solar panels, and all of these symptoms have come back. f. Steps to reduce exposure: While our bedroom stayed at 1 to 5 µW/m², we saw our health start to improve. Since the larger node went in, finding low-exposure housing has been a constant struggle, especially in the DC area. Question 5n (Regulatory changes): Exposure limits and siting rules should account for long-term, close-range residential exposure from infrastructure placed next to homes. That includes enforceable setbacks from bedrooms and living spaces. Question 9 (Disclosure): Residents should get advance public notice when wireless equipment near their homes is installed or upgraded. That notice should include the frequency bands and expected power levels. Rental listings should disclose…
*See attached for comments.
*See attached for comments.
*See attached for comments.
*See attached for comments.
*See attached for comments.
*See attached for comments.
Loading more comments…