All FCC comments · page 7

26110083505

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083505

For the past 3 years I have had a hair follicle test and every year the results come back showing significant emf radiation exposure. My health is being adversely affected by all of the cell network, WiFi and electronic radiation. Please be mindful of how harmful unbridled technology really is to humanity.

26110083504

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083504

I have had a chronic illness for over 20 years and the effects from wireless technology has made recovering exceedingly difficult. I am unable to have wireless in the house due to headaches that feel almost tinny in my head. I cannot be in a car that using GPS or any other "bells and whistles" as it causes my condition to worsen. I also notice that if my children are near wifi/cell towers, they experience ill effects. Not to mention, flying in planes tends to aggravate my condition significantly. I have to do particular protocols in order to feel some what ok. Thank you for taking the time to read and have the ability to submit concerns as I do in fact wish the continued advancement of wireless is causing much harm to our society as a whole.

26110083503

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083503

26110083502

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083502

Our loved one was harmed by over exposure to harmful wireless radiation where she worked and in an apartment building where she lived. Neither place would test the area. She heard a physician speak about his daughter's problem with RF radiation exposure. She purchased the meter he recommended and tested the environments, which were in the high danger zone. She moved out. She suffers greatly and cannot go in many places without excruciating pain (headaches, jaw pain, stomach pain (as if being punched in stomach), brain fog, speech problems, etc. She once visited Green Bank WV and felt peace. If she walks on a beach or barefoot in the woods, she feels better. Her life and travels have been significantly compromised as a result. She has been unable to fly or go to many places. Please update guidelines and create safe places and require companies to create safe portable phones and other devices for people like our loved one. She recently moved to a new place and has been unable to create a safe environment. She needs a landline, but the wiring was removed when the contractors renovated the house and local suppliers refuse to install one. She rarely goes to large events and even struggles going to church because there are no safe zones, despite her pleas to create these. When she goes into a hospital (after working in hospitals her entire life), she gets quite sick. She can only travel in old cars, since so many of the newer ones have too much technology. We're concerned for her life, as it looks like she now needs surgery for something and we're concerned about how to protect her during and after surgery and recovery. Most physicians we encounter here in Boston don't even recognize this issue yet. Please help her and all those who suffer from this manmade disaster. Please update guidelines for safety to reflect current data, to help protect people from this kind of harm.

26110083501

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083501

I request an independent review of the science, performed by entities not tied to the wireless or mobile communications industry. Over the last nine years, neighborhoods all over the USA have been left helpless against devices that you (FCC) categorize as intentional radiators. These devices have been installed right outside peoples homes, without their consent. Some antennas are not even found on antennasearch.com. People in urban areas are being overexposed to non-ionizing radiation and safety standards must be re-examined and updated. Prolonged exposure to RF radiation has adverse health impacts. I can limit the time I hold the cell phone up to my head, and keep my phone away from me when I sleep. Besides moving, what can I do to protect my health from the intentional radiator outside my bedroom while I sleep?

26110083499

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083499

26110083497 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083497 Re: FCC Seeks Comment on RF Exposure Issues Subject to D.C. Circuit Remand in Environmental Health Trust v. FCC - ET Docket No. 13-84 I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. This is my second comment and the next several paragraph's are the same as yesterday's. The Court directed the FCC to explain its determination that FCC guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure using wireless devices and technological developments, environmental impacts, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence from those of us who have suffered harm from the accumulative effects of RF radiation along with the environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. I believe the FCC should review the following study to address the concerns regarding wireless radiation because my sibling and I both suffer from neurological effects, oxidative stress, probably DNA damage if we can get tested and electromagnetic sensitivity and I have witnessed many of the same symptoms in other families in my community who suffer from EMR Syndrome: BioInitiative Report (2012, with Subsequent Research Updates): Updated Research Summaries – Collection of scientific research concerning neurological effects, oxidative stress, DNA damage, genetic effects, and electromagnetic sensitivity. Individual summaries have different update dates, including 2022. Updated Research Summaries Updated Research Summaries 2022 Updated Research Summaries (May 2022) These are invaluable sets of abstracts and tables covering the RFR... MY STORY CONTINUED: Another expense I will now incur is restating my Living Trust and specifically my…

Read the full comment →

26110083496

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083496

26110083495

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083495

26110083494

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083494

26110083493

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083493

26110083492

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083492

26110083491 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083491 Re: FCC Seeks Comment on RF Exposure Issues Subject to D.C. Circuit Remand in Environmental Health Trust v. FCC - ET Docket No. 13-84 The FCC's limits were set 30 years ago, amidst a very different environment and lifestyle and there has been no scientific review since. And even with all the existing science, the United States still has no radio-frequency exposure guidelines that address long term, chronic, non-heating exposures. Therefore I request that the FCC update and correct their guidelines in line with all of the research that was presented in the original court case, EHT/CHD vs FCC . Declaration of Toby Stover Toby Stover declares under penalty of perjury the following: 1. I live in Ulster County, New York. 2. I never gave consent, nor do I consent today, to continuous, involuntary exposure of pulsed modulated, biologically active electrical and radio frequency / microwave (RF/MW) radiation emitted into my home or on my property. 3. I was perfectly healthy, living in my home for many years with an analog electric utility meter but was made ill by the electrical and pulsed modulated RF/MW radiation coming from a “smart” digital electric utility meter which was installed on my property without my consent. 4. After having a grid-tied solar system installed on my home, Central Hudson Electric Company switched my mechanical analog meter to a “smart” electric utility meter without my knowledge. A number of weeks later, I became extremely ill and discovered that the company had switched out my meter. I contacted the electric company demanding that they remove the “smart” meter and return an analog meter. I was told by Central Hudson that the solar array would not work without a “smart” utility meter. After researching this, I discovered that solar arrays work perfectly well with analog meters but Central Hudson still refused to remove the “smart” meter. Since I was unable to live with the continuous pulsation of the smart meter I was left with the decision to either have to leave my home of 35 years or cut the electric line to the smart meter. I chose to cut the wire rather than be sickened in my home…

Read the full comment →

26110083490

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083490

26110083487

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083487

26110083486

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083486

26110083484

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083484

26110083483

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083483

26110083482

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083482

26110083480

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083480