All FCC comments · page 8

26110083479

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083479

26110083477

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083477

26110083476

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083476

26110083475

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083475

26110083473

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083473

26110083472

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083472

26110083470

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083470

26110083469

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083469

26110083468

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083468

Hello, I'm living in Belgium and I know I'm electrohypersensitif since 4 years, but I'm suffering from electrohypersensitivity since 28 years. I had a lot of symptoms since all these years, tinnitus, headaches, visual problems and burning eyes, fatigue, sleeping problems, burning sensations in the head, balance problems, nervousness, agitation, just feeling horrible... I live since these 28 years near to an antenna and little by little my symptoms became worse, particulary after the installation of 4G and 4G+. I can't live in my house anymore and have to go sleeping outside in my van, summer and winter. I'm still searching for a white zone, but i't's really hard to find, since antennas are installed everywhere. I've asked for help at the local authorities, but they don't want to take away the antenne or change the orientation of the antenna, even if other neighbours have symptoms as well. I lost my job as a welder, and can't even follow another formation to learn another job, because there is wif-fi and phones everywhere. My health is suffering a lot from the wireless technology. During this 4 years, I met so many other people who are suffering from electrohypersensitivity. It's terrible for the young generation too, who are themselves impacted, sometimes without knowing why. I want to thank you that you give us the opportunity to alert around this question. There was a local tv that made a news report about our situation. Here is the link: https://www.notele.be/it505-media162960-le-plus-de-l-info-l-electro-hypersensibilite-comment-vivre-avec-ce-calvaire.html. I'm part of one of the 2 belgian organisations (AREHS and VEHS) of people suffering from ehs, there are more 1000 people in the both, but we can observe that a lot of more people have become ehs and are not yet membres.

26110083467

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083467

26110083466

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083466

26110083455 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083455 Comments of Erin Finegold ET Docket No. 13-84, DA 26-997 Remand Issue: Testing Procedures for Cell Phones and Other Portable Devices I write in support of compliance testing that measures portable devices as they are carried and used. I am the founder and CEO of StingRay Shields Corporation, which develops patented passive RF technology, including Shield Antenna. I request no endorsement of any product and submit no proprietary information. This comment rests on the Commission’s own record. The question on remand is narrow. The court did not resolve the scientific debate and did not find the Commission’s procedures technically invalid. It held that the Commission had not reasonably explained its decision to retain them. Environmental Health Trust v. FCC, 9 F.4th 893 (D.C. Cir. 2021), slip op. at 19–20, 31. A reasoned explanation must address three points. First, the Commission cannot merely repeat its safety-margin rationale without curing the explanatory deficiency identified by the court. In paragraph 14 of FCC 19-126 the Commission gave four reasons for declining zero-spacing body testing: head testing with no separation, maximum-power testing, actual test distances that tended to be less than 2.5 centimeters (with a maximum of 1 centimeter for hotspot testing), and the “large safety margin” in the limits. The court held that the safety-margin explanation depended on an inadequately explained premise: that RF exposure below the existing limits does not cause harmful non-cancer effects. The court concluded that this explanatory defect also undermined the justification for retaining the testing procedures, noting that footnote 49 of the order linked challenges to testing with challenges to the exposure limits. On remand the Commission should state whether the first three reasons independently justify retaining the procedures, and on what record basis. Second, the Commission should separate two questions it merged in 2019: whether a certified device stays within the numerical limits in ordinary body-contact use, and whether those limits protect health. The first is a measurement question. The Commission…

Read the full comment →

26110083454

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083454

I've been a real estate agent in the Snowflake area since 2002. I've been working closely with a well know MCS (multiple chemical sensitivity) community near the town. Over the past year I've helped them fight to keep a Verizon 5G tower out of their neighborhood. We thought we had it won as county sided with us, but Verizon brought a law suit on the county and won. This tower just got completed yesterday. It will completely ruin these residents (approx 30) property values. It is an unimaginable crime against them, destroying their lives/livelihood. Cell service at this location was good...this was a total waste of time, resources, and a 30 some year thriving neighborhood.

26110083452 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083452 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Reassessment of Federal Communications Commission Radiofrequency Exposure Limits and Policies ET Docket No. 13-84 To: Secretary, FCC Comments: Jean Lemieux, President of the Massachusetts Association for the Chemically Injured, Inc. submits comment in the above-captioned proceeding. I, Jean A. Lemieux, am providing comment on behalf of the members of the Massachusetts Association for the Chemically Injured (MACI), a volunteer, non-profit statewide support, education and referral organization for people with Multiple Chemical Sensitivity on the proceeding of FCC Docket 13-84. The Massachusetts Association for the Chemical Injured’s comment centers on the issue of EMFs, wireless (RF) technology and potential health effects and harms experienced from the EMF and RF exposure from a general population public health perspective and specifically for vulnerable segments of the population, including those living with Multiple Chemical Sensitivity/Intolerance and those who are electrically sensitive (EHS)/EMR-S. My position on the current proceeding focuses on its reassessment of FCC exposure limits and policies that address the following: 1). a complete review of all of the science, inclusive of the biological health effects in the non-ionizing exposure category that has accumulated ii this docket and past one. FCC needs to review for reassessment the vast amount of research and scientific evidence that had been submitted in response to an update of new FCC guidelines and public health policy. 2). MACI’s comment on this proceeding will demonstrate the impact that the FCC’s failure to update guidelines on the current research and scientific evidence inclusive of the non-thermal biological evidence impacts human health. MACI participated in Public Comment to our State Departments of Public Utilities Dockets and the impact of the deficient FCC guidelines was used as a benchmark by the Department in the setting of policy (see MACI Reply Comment to DPU). My comment furnished evidence of real-life experience in related matters before…

Read the full comment →

26110083451

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083451

https://x.com/RosalitoEhs/status/1961682070473752975 Can also view my website here to view other linked resources etc https://sickpeopleinneedehscommunity.com/#resources

26110083447

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083447

26110083443

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083443

My experiences inclue: a strongheadache (an 8 on a scale of 10) after a new cell tower was built and activiated. Previously, I never had a migrane headache, like other people. I went to Swede. There everone I met were either harmed by electromagnetic radiation or knew people who were! In Sweden, I felt fine for 4 days. I relocated. Four days agai, headache reaapreared. Grrr! This experience repeated again and again......I slept uncomforatbly in the rental car. Rarely I asked a homeowner for a shower. To get food was distant. I slept in a Swedish log cottage with a ground fire in the middle space and layers of deer fir to sleep on. Nice. I had to leave. New guests were arriving. To continue: People harmed by electromagnetic radiation may carry in their bodies a remembered the injury from invisible electromagnetic radiation. My home is similar to a faraday cage. No wifi, no drones, in a no-fly-zone, NRQZ (National Radio Quiet Zone) protected by USA congress in 1956. A person visited, was here 10 minutes. She HAD to leave immediately. She did not allow her body to forget the constant invisible pain (in faraday like cage) in our home. I tried to contact her. No luck. A hospital diagnosed her having "VibroAcousticDisease" (VAD= vibro acoustic sound waves) in her obituary (2025). She had died. I feel sad and very helpless. Harmful places I deteted: creeks and rivers carry frequencies (my reactions were confirmed by a medical doctor / scientist), stil lakes, ponds reflect th sun (I met a few people can only go out during certain nights. The ocean is too moving to reflect a constant-continual frequency. A rock clif reflects radiation emitted from vehicles. Trains (higher frequency as the train approaches: experience, the radiation harms and rightens me. I experienced the ding ding of an approaching train, the gate arms lowered, I braced myself. No train. the dings stopped, no train. Wish, the train very quickly passed.

26110083442

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083442

26110083438

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083438

26110083435

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083435