AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110083556
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083556
All FCC comments · page 5
2,415 public comments, newest first, 20 per page. Keep scrolling to load more.
AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110083555
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083555
Official documents · 1
AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110083554
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083554
Official documents · 1
AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110083553
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083553
Official documents · 1
AI summary & topic connections
- Sensitivity & health experiences:
I have been injured and have a medical diagnosis of injury and disability from exposure from RF EMF from a cell tower base station, and it has upended my life, given me migraine like blinding ice pick headaches, nausea, dizziness, palpitations, insomnia and forced me from my home, having to sleep in my car and in makeshift accommodation to avoid exposure to let my body recover.
- Sleep & neurological concerns:
I have been injured and have a medical diagnosis of injury and disability from exposure from RF EMF from a cell tower base station, and it has upended my life, given me migraine like blinding ice pick headaches, nausea, dizziness, palpitations, insomnia and forced me from my home, having to sleep in my car and in makeshift accommodation to avoid exposure to let my body recover.
- Cancer & tumors:
RF EMF is a hazard, carcinogen, nuisance and toxin- and we do not consent to ourselves or our children or our neighbors being involuntarily exposed.
- Children, schools & development:
Soon we learned this was the story of many communities and individuals who had a wireless facility constructed near them or on their apartment buildings or school.
- Disability, access & daily life:
I have been injured and have a medical diagnosis of injury and disability from exposure from RF EMF from a cell tower base station, and it has upended my life, given me migraine like blinding ice pick headaches, nausea, dizziness, palpitations, insomnia and forced me from my home, having to sleep in my car and in makeshift accommodation to avoid exposure to let my body recover.
- Towers, antennas & siting:
Biological health and safety must be accounted for when placing cell towers- currently it is not.
- Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices:
Those injured by cell towers and smart meters should not be considered "collateral damage" and "the cost of doing business" as we were called.
- Wildlife & environment:
We must hire attorneys, provide medical documentation and go through the test of if the accommodation to have a low RF environment is reasonable or not.
- Exposure limits & testing:
Yet the FCC argues this is safe because the levels measured in my neighborhood are a small percentage of the FCC's antiquated 1996 exposure standards based on 80's science before the smartphone was invented and before towers were widespread.
- Court remand & agency accountability:
We have been in litigation for over six years, more recently in the Supreme Judicial Court, who less than three months ago ruled that a uniform network is more important than the health and safety of those living in communities with wireless base stations- despite the science, the testimony of our doctors and subject matter experts and our lived experiences of injury and harm.
- Research, evidence & monitoring:
This is backed up by studies of symptoms near cell towers, which return to normal baseline levels of illness at around 1640 feet.
Original comment · unedited text
26110083552 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083552 Biological health and safety must be accounted for when placing cell towers- currently it is not. The FCC is not a health and safety agency, nor are they versed in biological harms from exposure to RF EMF from wireless base stations and devices. I have been injured and have a medical diagnosis of injury and disability from exposure from RF EMF from a cell tower base station, and it has upended my life, given me migraine like blinding ice pick headaches, nausea, dizziness, palpitations, insomnia and forced me from my home, having to sleep in my car and in makeshift accommodation to avoid exposure to let my body recover. Those injured by cell towers and smart meters should not be considered "collateral damage" and "the cost of doing business" as we were called. Health and safety cannot be guaranteed, and this docket shows the science and mechanism of harm. Those sharing their stories are the evidence of this harm and we deserve to be protected, assisted and made whole. The FCC does not track those injured by wireless. There is no registry, no avenue for redress or avenue to be made whole. In our case, our home was rendered uninhabitable by our Board of Health due to the nuisance, toxin and hazard emitted from the wireless transmitting facility built at the top of our neighborhood. We have been in litigation for over six years, more recently in the Supreme Judicial Court, who less than three months ago ruled that a uniform network is more important than the health and safety of those living in communities with wireless base stations- despite the science, the testimony of our doctors and subject matter experts and our lived experiences of injury and harm. The FCC prevents health and safety from being considered when siting a tower- but what is worse is those injured once the tower starts transmitting have no recourse. In my neighborhood, a resident commented that when she learned about the tower she had no feelings either way, but started developing insomnia and headaches once it started transmitting. She spent time at her boyfriend's house not near a base station and the insomnia and headache resolved. She…
AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110083550
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083550
Official documents · 1
AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110083549
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083549
Official documents · 1
AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110083548
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083548
Official documents · 8
- Canadians 4 Safe Technology submission to FCC Proceeding 13-84.pdf ↗
- Michigan Energy Policy Committee - final handout.pdf ↗
- Sears Friesen BEMS POSTER June2015.pdf ↗
- C4ST-140-Studies-Omitted-By-Health-Canada-Showing-Harm July2014.pdf ↗
- Building-science-and-radiofrequency-radiation--What-mak_2020_Building-and-En.pdf ↗
- ICBE-EMF criticism of The WHO-commissioned systematic reviews re RFR.pdf ↗
- White Paper Include-Anthropogenic-Radiofrequency-Electromagnetic-Radiation-in-Canadian-Environmental-Protection-Act-CEPA-Amendments_PCN-C4ST_2022-04-07.pdf ↗
- Analysis-of-recommended-localized-human-exposure-limits-for-radiofrequency-fields-in-the-frequency-range-6-GHz-to-300-GHz-by-Consumer-Clinical-Radiation-Protection-Bureau-Health-Canada-January-2021.pdf ↗
AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110083547
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083547
Official documents · 2
AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110083546
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083546
Official documents · 9
- WiRED Comment for FCC 10.22.26.pdf ↗
- My Personal EHS Story CA 2026.docx ↗
- Wydaeghe_2026_Phys._Med._Biol._71_175006.pdf ↗
- Risks to Health and Well Being From RFR 2019.pdf ↗
- Scientific Evidence Invalidates Health Assumptions Underlying the FCC and ICNIRP Exposure Limit Determinations for RFR 2022.pdf ↗
- Health and Safety Practices and Policies Concerning Human Exposure to RF 2025.pdf ↗
- ehs-mechanisms-ys-iu.pdf ↗
- Belpomme-Environmental-health-2015.pdf ↗
- Martin Pall article on WiFi health harms.pdf ↗
AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110083544
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083544
Official documents · 1
AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110083543
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083543
Official documents · 9
- FCC PASAFETECH 13-84 ReassessRFLimits 102226 FINAL .pdf ↗
- 2018 08 15 PASAFETECH PASM HEARING REQUEST (1).pdf ↗
- 2019 08 22 PASAFETECH Hearing Request Handsigned (3).pdf ↗
- PaSafetech May 26, 2021.pdf ↗
- 062121 Final General Assembly June 21 Professionals Letter (1).pdf ↗
- PASAFETECH BROADBAND LETTER 112221 (2) (1).pdf ↗
- PaSafeTech letter 1-6-22 with Complete 27 volumes.pdf ↗
- PASafeTech to FDA 123123 FINAL Revised (5).pdf ↗
- PA Safe Tech to PASILC 123123 (1).pdf ↗
AI summary & topic connections
- Sleep & neurological concerns:
The Commission should examine long-term, low-level exposure and non-cancer effects, including neurological, reproductive, and developmental effects, oxidative stress, and DNA damage, rather than relying on short-term heating thresholds.
- Cancer & tumors:
Long-term and non-cancer effects.
- Children, schools & development:
Children and vulnerable people.
- Pregnancy & reproduction:
I ask the Commission to address children, pregnancy, and medically vulnerable people specifically.
- Biological mechanisms & metabolism:
The Commission should examine long-term, low-level exposure and non-cancer effects, including neurological, reproductive, and developmental effects, oxidative stress, and DNA damage, rather than relying on short-term heating thresholds.
- Disability, access & daily life:
1950 on Kent's West Hill is located in unincorporated South King County, Kent, Washington, in a community of color, immigrants, refugees, and low-income households.
- Towers, antennas & siting:
I am a community member and advocate who is directly affected by a 100-foot industrial AT&T cell tower sited in a historic human and pet cemetery, and I write from firsthand experience.
- Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices:
The FCC is open to public comments for Cell Phone and Wireless Radio Frequency Radiation (RF) Health Effects and other Non-ionizing Electro Magnetic Frequency (EMF).
- Wildlife & environment:
Animals and the environment.
- Exposure limits & testing:
The FCC has no wildlife-specific exposure limits.
- Research, evidence & monitoring:
The record includes research showing children absorb more RF energy than adults (e.g., Fernández et al., 2018, Environmental Research).
Original comment · unedited text
26110083542 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083542 I am a concerned Indigenous American, Creek Nation, and a Board Director of the Community and Friends of Seattle-Tacoma Pet Cemetery, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit. I submit these comments as an individual, not on behalf of the organization. I am a community member and advocate who is directly affected by a 100-foot industrial AT&T cell tower sited in a historic human and pet cemetery, and I write from firsthand experience. I have followed the permitting and legal record closely. The situation. The historic Seattle-Tacoma Pet Cemetery est. 1950 on Kent's West Hill is located in unincorporated South King County, Kent, Washington, in a community of color, immigrants, refugees, and low-income households. Humans, pets, K-9 officers, and service animals are buried here, some as whole families. Many cultural traditions exist here. In Indigenous cultures and spiritual traditions, animals are regarded as equally important as humans, deserving of the same dignity, honor, and respect in life and death. I hold that humans and animals call for the same and equal respect in life and death. In 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic, Crown Castle installed a 100-foot industrial AT&T cell tower inside active Burial Block 13 with graves and mourners and 115 feet from neighboring homes in opposition to cemetery patrons, neighbors, and community members at large. It was installed in the wrong zone without a conditional use permit, in violation of King County Code and Washington State cemetery law. Additionally, Crown Castle did not disclose the human burials or the cemetery's historic significance on its permit application, and the project was pushed through the King County Department of Permitting and Environmental Review without addressing them. I have opposed its placement and operation since 2019. Why this matters to the issues before the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). The FCC is open to public comments for Cell Phone and Wireless Radio Frequency Radiation (RF) Health Effects and other Non-ionizing Electro Magnetic Frequency (EMF). I am talking about RF in this comment because that is the issue in the situation. The FCC's…
AI summary & topic connections
- Sensitivity & health experiences:
Research notes that children absorb more radio-frequency radiation due to their developing bodies which exposes them to long-term health problems such as cancer and neurological symptoms.
- Sleep & neurological concerns:
Research notes that children absorb more radio-frequency radiation due to their developing bodies which exposes them to long-term health problems such as cancer and neurological symptoms.
- Cancer & tumors:
Research notes that children absorb more radio-frequency radiation due to their developing bodies which exposes them to long-term health problems such as cancer and neurological symptoms.
- Children, schools & development:
Children and vulnerable people.
- Pregnancy & reproduction:
I ask the Commission to address children, pregnancy, and medically vulnerable people specifically.
- Biological mechanisms & metabolism:
The Commission should examine long-term, low-level exposure and non-cancer effects, including neurological, reproductive, and developmental effects, oxidative stress, and DNA damage, rather than relying on short-term heating thresholds.
- Disability, access & daily life:
1950 on Kent's West Hill is located in unincorporated South King County, Kent, Washington, in a community of color, immigrants, refugees, and low-income households.
- Towers, antennas & siting:
I am a community member and advocate who is directly affected by a 100-foot industrial AT&T cell tower sited in a historic human and pet cemetery, and I write from firsthand experience.
- Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices:
The FCC is open to public comments for Cell Phone and Wireless Radio Frequency Radiation (RF) Health Effects and other Non-ionizing Electro Magnetic Frequency (EMF).
- Wildlife & environment:
Animals and the environment.
- Exposure limits & testing:
The FCC has no wildlife-specific exposure limits.
- Research, evidence & monitoring:
The record includes research showing children absorb more RF energy than adults (e.g., Fernández et al., 2018, Environmental Research).
Original comment · unedited text
26110083541 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083541 I am the Board Secretary of the nonprofit, Community and Friends of Seattle-Tacoma Pet Cemetery, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit. I submit these comments as an individual, not on behalf of the organization. I am a community member and advocate who is directly affected by a 100-foot industrial AT&T cell tower sited in a historic human and pet cemetery, and I write from firsthand experience. I have followed the permitting and legal record closely. The situation. The historic Seattle-Tacoma Pet Cemetery est. 1950 on Kent's West Hill is located in unincorporated South King County, Kent, Washington, in a community of color, immigrants, refugees, and low-income households. Humans, pets, K-9 officers, and service animals are buried here, some as whole families. Many cultural traditions exist here. In Indigenous cultures and spiritual traditions, animals are regarded as equally important as humans, deserving of the same dignity, honor, and respect in life and death. I hold that humans and animals call for the same and equal respect in life and death. In 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic, Crown Castle installed a 100-foot industrial AT&T cell tower inside active Burial Block 13 with graves and mourners and 115 feet from neighboring homes in opposition to cemetery patrons, neighbors, and community members at large. It was installed in the wrong zone without a conditional use permit, in violation of King County Code and Washington State cemetery law. Additionally, Crown Castle did not disclose the human burials or the cemetery's historic significance on its permit application, and the project was pushed through the King County Department of Permitting and Environmental Review without addressing them. I have opposed its placement and operation since 2019. Why this matters to the issues before the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). The FCC is open to public comments for Cell Phone and Wireless Radio Frequency Radiation (RF) Health Effects and other Non-ionizing Electro Magnetic Frequency (EMF). I am talking about RF in this comment because that is the issue in the situation. The FCC's standards are the primary protection…
AI summary & topic connections
- Sleep & neurological concerns:
The Commission should examine long-term, low-level exposure and non-cancer effects, including neurological, reproductive, and developmental effects, oxidative stress, and DNA damage, rather than relying on short-term heating thresholds.
- Cancer & tumors:
Long-term and non-cancer effects.
- Children, schools & development:
Children and vulnerable people.
- Pregnancy & reproduction:
I ask the Commission to address children, pregnancy, and medically vulnerable people specifically.
- Biological mechanisms & metabolism:
The Commission should examine long-term, low-level exposure and non-cancer effects, including neurological, reproductive, and developmental effects, oxidative stress, and DNA damage, rather than relying on short-term heating thresholds.
- Disability, access & daily life:
1950 on Kent's West Hill is located in unincorporated South King County, Kent, Washington, in a community of color, immigrants, refugees, and low-income households.
- Towers, antennas & siting:
I am a community member and advocate who is directly affected by a 100-foot industrial AT&T cell tower sited in a historic human and pet cemetery, and I write from firsthand experience.
- Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices:
The FCC is open to public comments for Cell Phone and Wireless Radio Frequency Radiation (RF) Health Effects and other Non-ionizing Electro Magnetic Frequency (EMF).
- Wildlife & environment:
Animals and the environment.
- Exposure limits & testing:
The FCC has no wildlife-specific exposure limits.
- Research, evidence & monitoring:
The record includes research showing children absorb more RF energy than adults (e.g., Fernández et al., 2018, Environmental Research).
Original comment · unedited text
26110083540 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083540 I am the Board President of the nonprofit, Community and Friends of Seattle-Tacoma Pet Cemetery, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit. I submit these comments as an individual, not on behalf of the organization. I am a community member and advocate who is directly affected by a 100-foot industrial AT&T cell tower sited in a historic human and pet cemetery, and I write from firsthand experience. I have followed the permitting and legal record closely. The situation. The historic Seattle-Tacoma Pet Cemetery est. 1950 on Kent's West Hill is located in unincorporated South King County, Kent, Washington, in a community of color, immigrants, refugees, and low-income households. Humans, pets, K-9 officers, and service animals are buried here, some as whole families. Many cultural traditions exist here. In Indigenous cultures and spiritual traditions, animals are regarded as equally important as humans, deserving of the same dignity, honor, and respect in life and death. I hold that humans and animals call for the same and equal respect in life and death. In 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic, Crown Castle installed a 100-foot industrial AT&T cell tower inside active Burial Block 13 with graves and mourners and 115 feet from neighboring homes in opposition to cemetery patrons, neighbors, and community members at large. It was installed in the wrong zone without a conditional use permit, in violation of King County Code and Washington State cemetery law. Additionally, Crown Castle did not disclose the human burials or the cemetery's historic significance on its permit application, and the project was pushed through the King County Department of Permitting and Environmental Review without addressing them. I have opposed its placement and operation since 2019. Why this matters to the issues before the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). The FCC is open to public comments for Cell Phone and Wireless Radio Frequency Radiation (RF) Health Effects and other Non-ionizing Electro Magnetic Frequency (EMF). I am talking about RF in this comment because that is the issue in the situation. The FCC's standards are the primary protection…
AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110083539
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083539
Official documents · 1
AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110083538
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083538
Official documents · 1
AI summary & topic connections
- Cancer & tumors:
2.That with decades of evidence of harm it very overdue to upgrade the carcinogenic grade level of EMR to Definitely Carcinogenic or may be even worse than that.
- Biological mechanisms & metabolism:
(2021): Human-made electromagnetic fields: Ion forced-oscillation and voltage-gated ion channel dysfunction, oxidative stress and DNA damage – Reviewed evidence and proposed mechanisms linking human-made electromagnetic fields to oxidative stress, DNA damage, and cellular dysfunction.
- Towers, antennas & siting:
I had an event where I had to sit on my analog water meter out in the hot FL sun to preserve it or get regularly radiated my a nearby cell tower of 1K uw/m2, which could be inappropriately changed without notice.
- Wired connections & alternatives:
3.That everyone needs to be educated, trained and simply explained with proof to turn off RF at night, keep devices off your body and hard wire all devices at a minimum.
- Court remand & agency accountability:
(2021): Human-made electromagnetic fields: Ion forced-oscillation and voltage-gated ion channel dysfunction, oxidative stress and DNA damage – Reviewed evidence and proposed mechanisms linking human-made electromagnetic fields to oxidative stress, DNA damage, and cellular dysfunction.
- Research, evidence & monitoring:
Here is one study I believe the FCC should review when addressing the concerns about wireless radiation: Panagopoulos et al.
Original comment · unedited text
26110083537 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083537 This issue matters to me personally: The most safe eletromagnetic radiation (EMR) is 1.0 uw/m2 according to the Building Biology Institute (BBI) but can be workable in the day time only up to 10.0 uw/m2 maximum. Therefore, anything beyond is a detriment to thriving and wellness. Of the 4 EMR frequencies I am only speaking of the radio frequency (RF) today. I had an event where I had to sit on my analog water meter out in the hot FL sun to preserve it or get regularly radiated my a nearby cell tower of 1K uw/m2, which could be inappropriately changed without notice. It was totally detrimental and unsafe for me. The whole event was very scary with 3 men towering over me, while I was on the ground, including a sheriff that I said to all do not touch me being a small, slight woman. It was very stressful, disturbing and fortunately being informed ahead of time I was at home. They attempted to talk me into moving but I did not and they eventually left. Gratefully I still have that analog meter, which the water company physically reads and bills as usual. I am asking: 1.That these EMR responsibilities be taken over my appropriate departments, such as the U.S Deptment of Health and Human Services, which contain doctors, health practitioners, building biologists, electrical engineers and the like who have expertise in these areas without prejudice and are regularly audited. 2.That with decades of evidence of harm it very overdue to upgrade the carcinogenic grade level of EMR to Definitely Carcinogenic or may be even worse than that. 3.That everyone needs to be educated, trained and simply explained with proof to turn off RF at night, keep devices off your body and hard wire all devices at a minimum. 4.That with the RF boundary-less invasion through over densification of cell tower RF and surveillance that need to be re-purposed to emit healthful, rejuvenating output. Here is one study I believe the FCC should review when addressing the concerns about wireless radiation: Panagopoulos et al. (2021): Human-made electromagnetic fields: Ion forced-oscillation and voltage-gated ion channel dysfunction, oxidative stress…
AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110083536
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083536
Official documents · 1
AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110083535
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083535
Official documents · 1
Loading more comments…