All FCC comments · page 39

2,415 public comments, newest first, 20 per page. Keep scrolling to load more.

#761Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Public Comment on Reopened Docket Regarding Wireless Radiation Sa…by Marcia Keizer » 2026-10-21
AI summary & topic connections
  • Sleep & neurological concerns: In my own home, I have taken steps to hardwire our internet connection to protect our sleep and focus, but we cannot escape the dense web of neighborhood cell towers outside our home and when visiting the towns and cities.
  • Cancer & tumors: National Toxicology Program (NTP) comprehensive $25 million study proved that chronic exposure to cell phone radiation causes significant, measurable DNA damage—specifically in the frontal cortex and hippocampus—as well as clear evidence of rare malignant tumors.
  • Children, schools & development: However, as an everyday user watching our children grow up surrounded by a 24/7 blanket of Wi-Fi, cell towers, and smart infrastructure, I know that our constant, real-world exposure looks nothing like the brief laboratory simulations used to set these guidelines.
  • Biological mechanisms & metabolism: I urge you to look at the independent, peer-reviewed data disproving the assumption that non-thermal radiation is harmless: • Definitive Evidence of DNA Damage: The U.S.
  • Towers, antennas & siting: However, as an everyday user watching our children grow up surrounded by a 24/7 blanket of Wi-Fi, cell towers, and smart infrastructure, I know that our constant, real-world exposure looks nothing like the brief laboratory simulations used to set these guidelines.
  • Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: However, as an everyday user watching our children grow up surrounded by a 24/7 blanket of Wi-Fi, cell towers, and smart infrastructure, I know that our constant, real-world exposure looks nothing like the brief laboratory simulations used to set these guidelines.
  • Wildlife & environment: • Environmental and Wildlife Disruption: Our ecosystem is suffering the collateral damage of unchecked wireless infrastructure.
  • Exposure limits & testing: Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Public Comment on Reopened Docket Regarding Wireless Radiation Safety Limits Dear Commissioners, As a deeply concerned citizen who values both technological innovation and the health of my family, I am writing to urge the FCC to completely overhaul its outdated radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
  • Court remand & agency accountability: Circuit Court correctly ruled in 2021 that the FCC failed to address severe gaps in its safety logic.
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: I urge you to look at the independent, peer-reviewed data disproving the assumption that non-thermal radiation is harmless: • Definitive Evidence of DNA Damage: The U.S.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110082740 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082740 Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Public Comment on Reopened Docket Regarding Wireless Radiation Safety Limits Dear Commissioners, As a deeply concerned citizen who values both technological innovation and the health of my family, I am writing to urge the FCC to completely overhaul its outdated radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The current standards, established decades ago, rely exclusively on preventing thermal (heating) harm. However, as an everyday user watching our children grow up surrounded by a 24/7 blanket of Wi-Fi, cell towers, and smart infrastructure, I know that our constant, real-world exposure looks nothing like the brief laboratory simulations used to set these guidelines. In my own home, I have taken steps to hardwire our internet connection to protect our sleep and focus, but we cannot escape the dense web of neighborhood cell towers outside our home and when visiting the towns and cities. The D.C. Circuit Court correctly ruled in 2021 that the FCC failed to address severe gaps in its safety logic. I urge you to look at the independent, peer-reviewed data disproving the assumption that non-thermal radiation is harmless: • Definitive Evidence of DNA Damage: The U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) comprehensive $25 million study proved that chronic exposure to cell phone radiation causes significant, measurable DNA damage—specifically in the frontal cortex and hippocampus—as well as clear evidence of rare malignant tumors. DNA damage occurs without any tissue heating, directly undermining the FCC's regulatory foundation. • Unique Vulnerabilities of Children: Our children's skulls are thinner, and their nervous systems are still dynamically developing. Millions of students sit directly under powerful industrial Wi-Fi routers all day. Compiled data from the BioInitiative Report establishes that low-intensity, non-thermal RF radiation alters gene expression and triggers neurological impacts at levels far below current FCC limits. • Environmental and Wildlife Disruption: Our ecosystem is suffering the collateral damage of unchecked wireless infrastructure.…

Read the full comment →

#762Attachment-only filingby Daniel Vasku » 2026-10-21
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110082739

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082739

Official documents · 1

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#763Attachment-only filingby K Bucklin » 2026-10-21
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110082738

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082738

Official documents · 1

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#764Attachment-only filingby Electromagnetic Radiation & Wireless Program, Children's Health Defense » 2026-10-21
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110082729

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082729

Official documents · 1

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#766Attachment-only filingby Courtney Taylor » 2026-10-21
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110082726

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082726

Official documents · 1

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#767I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its dec…by Janet L Endries » 2026-10-21
AI summary & topic connections
  • Cancer & tumors: The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer.
  • Children, schools & development: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Wildlife & environment: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Exposure limits & testing: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
  • Court remand & agency accountability: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110082724

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082724

I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. Here is just one study I believe the FCC should review when addressing the concerns about wireless radiation: Morgan, Kesari & Davis (2014): Why children absorb more microwave radiation than adults: The consequences – Reviewed evidence that children may absorb more wireless radiation than adults due to anatomical and physiological differences, raising questions about the adequacy of existing exposure standards. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. I urge the FCC to give meaningful consideration to the experiences and evidence before it and to fully address each of the issues identified by the court.

#768Attachment-only filingby Valerie Glasier » 2026-10-21
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110082723

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082723

Official documents · 1

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#769Attachment-only filingby Irena Mavridis » 2026-10-21
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110082722

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082722

Official documents · 3

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#770The world we live in, from electrical frequencies within the body to the Schumann Resonance of the planet…by James Thornton » 2026-10-21
AI summary & topic connections
  • Towers, antennas & siting: The types of radiation that eminate from dirty electricity, WiFi, Bluetooth, "smart" meters, LED lights, Cell phones/towers, some musical frequencies, and many many from military devices are extremely harmful to human health.
  • Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: The types of radiation that eminate from dirty electricity, WiFi, Bluetooth, "smart" meters, LED lights, Cell phones/towers, some musical frequencies, and many many from military devices are extremely harmful to human health.
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: Please do the righ thing for once and force any company to comply with third-party studies into the harmful effects of the frequencies they are putting out and make data reporting MANDATORY!

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110082719

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082719

The world we live in, from electrical frequencies within the body to the Schumann Resonance of the planet itself, works on frequencies. While many frequencies could be labeled as beneficial, there are MANY that are not. The types of radiation that eminate from dirty electricity, WiFi, Bluetooth, "smart" meters, LED lights, Cell phones/towers, some musical frequencies, and many many from military devices are extremely harmful to human health. Please do the righ thing for once and force any company to comply with third-party studies into the harmful effects of the frequencies they are putting out and make data reporting MANDATORY!

#772Attachment-only filingby Carmen Anderson » 2026-10-21
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110082716

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082716

Official documents · 1

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#773Re: ET Docket No. 13-84, Public Notice DA 26-997 I write as a concerned member of the public to urge the …by Fern Taylor » 2026-10-21
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110082715 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082715 Re: ET Docket No. 13-84, Public Notice DA 26-997 I write as a concerned member of the public to urge the Commission to update its radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic radiation (EMR) exposure limits, adopted in 1996 and based only on heating effects. The court’s remand. In Environmental Health Trust v. FCC, 9 F.4th 893 (D.C. Cir. 2021), the court found the Commission failed to explain its dismissal of evidence of non-cancer harms. That evidence has grown. The International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields concluded that current science invalidates the assumptions behind the FCC limits (ICBE-EMF, Environmental Health, 2022;21:92). Large animal studies. The U.S. National Toxicology Program found clear evidence of malignant heart schwannomas in male rats exposed to RF EMR, along with evidence of DNA damage (NTP TR-595, 2018). The Ramazzini Institute independently found the same tumor type at exposures modeled on cell towers (Falcioni et al., Environmental Research, 2018;165:496-503). The WHO’s International Agency for Research on Cancer classifies RF EMR as possibly carcinogenic, Group 2B (Baan et al., Lancet Oncology, 2011). Sleep and well-being. Controlled studies show RF exposure alters sleep EEG and cerebral blood flow (Huber et al., Journal of Sleep Research, 2002;11:289-295). Sleep underlies immune, hormonal and mental health, so even modest disruption across a population matters. Children. Children absorb more RF energy in the brain and bone marrow than the adult model used to set the limits (Gandhi et al., Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, 2012;31:34-51). Testing based on an adult male head does not protect them, and today’s children are exposed from birth, around the clock. Long-term, ubiquitous exposure. When the limits were set, exposure was brief and occasional. Today it is continuous: phones carried against the body, Wi-Fi, smart meters and dense 5G infrastructure. The limits have never been evaluated for decades of cumulative exposure from many sources at once. Environment. The Department of the Interior warned in 2014 that tower radiation may harm migratory…

Read the full comment →

#774I became ill in 2020 with atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation. A professional Building Biologist confi…by Patricia Gray » 2026-10-21
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110082713

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082713

I became ill in 2020 with atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation. A professional Building Biologist confirmed that the average radiation level in my living room and dining room was 45,000 Microwatts per meter square. The radiation was coming from cell towers nearby which pointed at my windows. It was also coming through the roof. The radiation level on the roof was 75,000 Microwatts per meter square. This led to my need to take cardiac medication and ultimately a Cardiac Ablation. I had to move away from the area to a neighborhood that had much lower levels of radiation. The radiation in my new residence is slowly coming up and I have had to fight with cell phone companies to try to keep new transmitters out of the neighborhood. I continue to need to take medication for my heart. I implore you to fight the escalation of dangerous radiation!

#775Buried copper wiring is safe, dependable and generally fireproof. The electricity comes from a distance, …by Diane C Williamson » 2026-10-21
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110082712

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082712

Buried copper wiring is safe, dependable and generally fireproof. The electricity comes from a distance, so the telephone line will work during a local fire. Cell phones emit electromagnetic radiation that makes some people sick. Cell phone towers emit even more radiation. I use a 4G flip phone carefully, but cannot switch to 5G, that would make me ill. I've tried using friends' phones. It's not fair that cell towers pollute the air all around them without homeowners having any control over where they are placed. I worry about our children in school, also.

#776Attachment-only filingby Kevin Mottus, Outreach Director CA Brain Tumor Assn. » 2026-10-20
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110082711

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082711

Official documents · 4

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#777I have EMRS (Electro- Magnetic Radiation Syndrome) I experience numerous negative health consequences whe…by C. Schellet » 2026-10-20
AI summary & topic connections
  • Sensitivity & health experiences: I will not list my specific issues here due to privacy in a public record, However, the research has shown many negative health and symptom related issues with exposures to radio frequency (RF) radiation.
  • Towers, antennas & siting: Cell towers and other wireless can bring severe pain to the center of my brain that feels like a burn.
  • Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: I have EMRS (Electro- Magnetic Radiation Syndrome) I experience numerous negative health consequences when exposed to wireless devices.
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: I will not list my specific issues here due to privacy in a public record, However, the research has shown many negative health and symptom related issues with exposures to radio frequency (RF) radiation.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110082707

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082707

I have EMRS (Electro- Magnetic Radiation Syndrome) I experience numerous negative health consequences when exposed to wireless devices. I will not list my specific issues here due to privacy in a public record, However, the research has shown many negative health and symptom related issues with exposures to radio frequency (RF) radiation. I have most of the symptoms that have already been published in scientific literature. Some exposures are disabling. Holding a cell phone brings on a lot of pain in my hands as well as flu-like symptoms. I have had to unplug all wi-fi, tv's, digital anteannas, cordless phones from my home. I have had to place a shield on the smart meter which severely sickened me when they were installed. Cell towers and other wireless can bring severe pain to the center of my brain that feels like a burn. There are numerous symptoms that occur when exposed but will go away when removed from the offending source of RF radiation. Different sources can bring different symptoms. My life has been crippled from this technology and it is getting harder to purchase any item without wi-fi (i.e. refrigerators, vehicles and more) and are unable to turn off the RF emitted from them. Please review the independent scientific literature and make life tolerable again for those of us suffering.

#778I would like to see more robust testing of the short AND long term effects of EMF exposure on all humans …by Hayley » 2026-10-20
AI summary & topic connections
  • E-Rate & school connectivity: History shows us that technology should be considerate guilty until proven innocent when it comes to human health.
  • Children, schools & development: I would like to see more robust testing of the short AND long term effects of EMF exposure on all humans (and not just the thermal effects), but especially long term exposure for everyone as well as to those vulnerable in the community like children and those with chronic illness.
  • Towers, antennas & siting: I'm concerned also about animal health such as cattle and the concerning court cases that have come out of parts of Europe regarding exposure to 5G.
  • Exposure limits & testing: I would like to see more robust testing of the short AND long term effects of EMF exposure on all humans (and not just the thermal effects), but especially long term exposure for everyone as well as to those vulnerable in the community like children and those with chronic illness.
  • Court remand & agency accountability: I'm concerned also about animal health such as cattle and the concerning court cases that have come out of parts of Europe regarding exposure to 5G.
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: I would like to see more robust testing of the short AND long term effects of EMF exposure on all humans (and not just the thermal effects), but especially long term exposure for everyone as well as to those vulnerable in the community like children and those with chronic illness.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110082706

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082706

I would like to see more robust testing of the short AND long term effects of EMF exposure on all humans (and not just the thermal effects), but especially long term exposure for everyone as well as to those vulnerable in the community like children and those with chronic illness. I'm concerned also about animal health such as cattle and the concerning court cases that have come out of parts of Europe regarding exposure to 5G. History shows us that technology should be considerate guilty until proven innocent when it comes to human health. Thank you!

#779Attachment-only filingby Silvia Calbo Aroca » 2026-10-20
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110082703

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082703

Official documents · 1

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#780I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its dec…by Zermann » 2026-10-20
AI summary & topic connections
  • Sensitivity & health experiences: This matter is of particular personal concern to me because: For several years, I have suffered the consequences of exposure to electromagnetic waves; my health has been lastingly impaired (manifesting as chronic pain and severe sleep disturbances).
  • Sleep & neurological concerns: This matter is of particular personal concern to me because: For several years, I have suffered the consequences of exposure to electromagnetic waves; my health has been lastingly impaired (manifesting as chronic pain and severe sleep disturbances).
  • Cancer & tumors: The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its decision that its guidelines adequately protect humans against the harmful, non-cancer-related effects of radiofrequency radiation.
  • Children, schools & development: Specifically, the Court required the FCC to address the effects of radiofrequency radiation on children, the health consequences of prolonged exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological advancements, environmental impacts, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for mobile phones and other portable devices.
  • Biological mechanisms & metabolism: (2021): Man-made electromagnetic fields: Ion-gated channel dysfunction, oxidative stress, and DNA damage—an examination of the evidence and proposed mechanisms linking man-made electromagnetic fields to oxidative stress, DNA damage, and cellular dysfunction.
  • Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: Specifically, the Court required the FCC to address the effects of radiofrequency radiation on children, the health consequences of prolonged exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological advancements, environmental impacts, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for mobile phones and other portable devices.
  • Wildlife & environment: The FCC should carefully examine evidence and real-world experiences regarding the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation—including non-cancer-related health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and effects on wildlife and the environment.
  • Exposure limits & testing: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
  • Court remand & agency accountability: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: The FCC should carefully examine evidence and real-world experiences regarding the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation—including non-cancer-related health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and effects on wildlife and the environment.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110082702 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082702 I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its decision that its guidelines adequately protect humans against the harmful, non-cancer-related effects of radiofrequency radiation. Specifically, the Court required the FCC to address the effects of radiofrequency radiation on children, the health consequences of prolonged exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological advancements, environmental impacts, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for mobile phones and other portable devices. The FCC should carefully examine evidence and real-world experiences regarding the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation—including non-cancer-related health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and effects on wildlife and the environment. Below is one study, among others, that I believe the FCC should review when addressing concerns related to wireless radiation: • Panagopoulos et al. (2021): Man-made electromagnetic fields: Ion-gated channel dysfunction, oxidative stress, and DNA damage—an examination of the evidence and proposed mechanisms linking man-made electromagnetic fields to oxidative stress, DNA damage, and cellular dysfunction. The FCC is not a health agency and possesses no expertise in medicine, biology, or public health. Yet, it continues to assert its authority over radiofrequency exposure standards and is preparing to conclude whether its current guidelines provide adequate protection for the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the essential role of federal health agencies—most notably the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services—and to draw upon appropriate expertise in the fields of health and biology to address the issues raised by the court. This matter is of particular personal concern to me because: For several years, I have suffered the consequences of exposure to electromagnetic waves; my health has been lastingly impaired (manifesting as…

Read the full comment →