All FCC comments · page 38

26110082775

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082775

26110082774

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082774

26110082772

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082772

26110082771

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082771

I am writing to ask you to allow freedom of choice regarding the wireless, RF, and EMF radiation that is known to be dangerous to human health. The NIH has shown that these can cause DNA damage, especially in children. Here in Massachusetts, the utility companies charge residents several hundred dollars a year if they opt out of having a Smart Meter (RF radiation) mounted on their homes. These fees are unrestricted and can increase at the whim of the utility companies. This is wrong. I should not have to pay to keep RF devices off my home. Thank you for your consideration.

26110082770

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082770

26110082769

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082769

26110082768

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082768

26110082767

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082767

26110082766

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082766

26110082762

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082762

26110082759 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082759 I have 2 grandchildren in public schools and am very worried about health radiation exposure from the wireless technology used in our schools. The risks include cancer (which is the 2nd cause of death in children). The core issue is that wireless technology was implemented, without consideration of the impact on human health, based on the 1996 FCC Regulation. Since then, new scientific studies have proven links to health risks from wireless radiation. I learned first-hand about illness from wireless exposure when I became ill in my own home. Having spent my career as a university librarian, I educated myself about this. The science points to strong associations between wireless radiation and multiple illnesses. The [U.S.] National Toxicology Program reports that wireless radiation causes DNA damage which results in cancer. Dr. Anthony Miller, former senior advisor to the WHO states that it should be promoted from 2B to 1A, a human carcinogen. In fact, this radiation is absorbed deeper into the bodies of children than into adults. The danger is not only in years to come, but NOW. For example, at Fay School in Southboro, MA, children exposed to Wi-Fi became ill with nose-bleeds, headaches, and nausea. The following steps should be implemented for schools: 1. Require that all computers within schools be hard-wired and eliminate wireless transmission. [This has already been done in Europe]. 2. To immediately minimize WI-FI signals, instruct school personnel to keep wireless routers and devices off when not in use. 3. Since funding may be a challenge, negotiate with the industry that brought in this toxic technology to subsidize the hard-wiring of school computer systems. Our children’s health should take top priority over corporate profit. 4. In addition to the many hours of exposure inside school, there is radiation from outside. Please oppose the installation of 5G antennas within a half-mile of school buildings [as has been done in Europe]. 5G increases radiation exposures manyfold, and at a crucial time of their development, children will be even more bombarded. Given that 1 in 3 people will develop…

Read the full comment →

26110082758

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082758

26110082756

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082756

To Whom it May Concern: Please think about the future of the children in your lives by looking at current research on how the existing RF exposures may be harming us all and our environment. Thank you.

26110082752

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082752

26110082751

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082751

26110082750

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082750

26110082749 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082749 Comment in Response to Public Notice DA 26-997, ET Docket No. 13-84 This comment addresses FCC’s methodological criteria for assessments of responses to the mentioned Public Notice as one may interpret from its questions in the FCC Public Notice page 7. These criteria are by and large those used by IEEE ICES and ICNIRP. The methodological criteria used by IEEE ICES and ICNIRP to identify thresholds for RF-EMF caused harmful health effects, are flawed – and so for several reasons detailed in referenced material: 1. At non-thermal levels, these standards explicitly restrict themselves to acute effects only, not accepting temporarily annoying effects as harmful effects (e.g., not tinnitus…), nor long term effects (e.g., not cancer, diabetes, …), and only effects objectively observable (e.g., not headache, nausea, , …). Effects have to be proven by research methods primarily appropriate for identifying thermal effects, even when effects are well demonstrated by acceptable methods not to be thermal. Research proving effects, but not using thermally based methods is regarded as no or poor evidence, hence dismissible. 2. Such thermal methodological criteria and stringent demands for proof may all be traced back to historical contexts of research on ionizing radiation effects and non-ionizing radiation’s thermal effects in which they are defensible. In the context of non-thermal effects of non-ionizing radiation they are not. However, they have been made part of standards in which they function as a bulwark against accepting any effects from RF-EMFs below thermal levels. Using such a thermal methodology produces conclusions of «no health effects found» as an artefact, i.e. as a result of the methodology as such, and is thus without any evidentiary power – just flawed. Such methodology also means dismissing a precautionary approach, as the scope is set far too restrictive. 3. The ICNIRP 2020 and ICES C95.1 2019 standards, by which, a.o., 5G deployment were legitimized worldwide, are based on research studies and assessments based on essentially these same methodological elements, and thus flawed, having no…

Read the full comment →

26110082748

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082748

26110082747

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082747

26110082742

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082742

i suffered negative health impact from EMF from cellphone, Wifi, cell towers, and wind turbines. it caused my diaphragm to constrict and disallow proper breathing. the wind turbine's emissions are the most powerful and their detrimental effects reach far and wide. my phone is now kept on airplane mode except during use with ear plugs, home computer, cell phone are hard wired at home and distance is kept from wind turbines and cell towers. i suffered much needless hardship as it took time to pin point the true cause of this severe debilitation. until then proper and efficacious measures could NOT be taken.