All FCC comments · page 41

26110082660

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082660

26110082658

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082658

26110082657 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082657 With the arrival of 3G in 2008, and the purchase of a 3G phone, symptoms quickly appeared: troubled vision in the morning as if in fog that was gradually dissipating; others became permanent, headaches, sleep disorders, tingling in the limbs when I worked on computers. I aligned these symptoms in an online search and discovered that these symptoms are due to intolerance to electromagnetic waves. I had to transform all the equipment in my house with specific solutions, with the help of a habitat biologist specialized in this case: shielded cables, grounded and insulated the bedroom walls. The symptoms decreased as long as I stay out of the wifi zone and call with the fixed line, the mobile only for emergencies and no more than 5 minutes away from my head. I could no longer frequent places with wifi and fixed wireless phones (DECT), or exposed to cell towers. With the proliferation of connected devices, the widespread use of connected objects via WiFi, and then the free WiFi in all public places, everything for me was getting worse: headaches, tingling sensations on the body, skin burns on the wrists, ankles, and face, digestive disorders, poor sleep, fatigue, dizziness, nausea, weight loss, tinnitus, zooms in on the head, ear warming even without calling, and when I started to experience loss of time reference and orientation, I informed my employer that I will no longer be able to keep this position, which is too exposed. This disability no longer allows me to work or even live in our house surrounded by wifi, so running away is my only salvation. I survive only thanks to an off-the-air location in the forest or in the basement of my parents' house, which is protected from the antennas by a good concrete screed, while waiting to find a place in a white zone and sell our house. I finally found a small village where there are no smart meters in operation, no cell towers nearby, no electrical cables above the house (since I have also become intolerant of 50 Hz), and the possibility of high-performance wired communication. (internet and telephone). To slowly regain health – even though my prolonged exposure…

Read the full comment →

26110082656

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082656

26110082655

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082655

26110082654

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082654

26110082653

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082653

26110082652

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082652

26110082651

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082651

26110082650

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082650

26110082649

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082649

26110082648

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082648

26110082646 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082646 I submit this comment as a 27-year-old resident of France who gradually developed severe, localized physiological and neurological symptoms from ambient and near-field electromagnetic fields since early 2021. It provides real-world data demonstrating that current regulatory safety margins completely fail to protect individuals with heightened physiological sensitivities. First of all, Current safety compliance models generally evaluate portable wireless devices under static, isolated transmission loads within laboratory environments. However, modern mobile applications, especially real-time navigation and maps, force simultaneous, high-capacity polling across multiple internal antennas, including GPS, cellular data, and Wi-Fi networks. This concurrent multi-radio aggregation drives localized thermal output and electromagnetic power density significantly higher than what is accounted for during single-antenna laboratory testing. The wireless industry itself explicitly recognizes this volatile phenomenon, as documented in hardware engineering blueprints like U.S. Patent No. US20120231784A1 (https://patents.google.com/patent/US20120231784A1/en), which designs proprietary methods for dynamic emission control to handle the erratic exposure fields generated by multi-carrier architectures. To more accurately align with typical consumer usage, it is recommended that the Commission update its Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) and power-density testing protocols. These updates should account for maximum simultaneous multi-radio aggregation configurations evaluated in realistic handling positions rather than standard laboratory spacing. Secondly, Current regulatory exposure models evaluate man-made radiofrequency (RF) emissions in isolation, which may overlook how background atmospheric conditions compound human physiological stress. Meteorological events like thunderstorms generate massive static electric charges, creating a highly dense, localized electrostatic field that acts as an environmental catalyst. For sensitized individuals, the convergence of these background fields, low-frequency device currents,…

Read the full comment →

26110082645

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082645

26110082644

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082644

26110082643

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082643

26110082642

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082642

I measured wireless radiation exposure in people's homes for over ten years. During this time I was contacted by thousands of people whose health was suffering from over exposure. I can assure you that this is a real problem. Unfortunately, many more people are not aware that this exposure is actually the source of their health issues. Please be diligent in your study of this problem. It could affect generations of citizens. Thank you.

26110082641 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082641 Here is what I know: if you take even minimal steps to reduce wi-if in the school, kids will be calmer and healthier. If health risks that doctors/scientists and thousands of studies do indeed exist, then we owe it to our children. We are bioelectrical beings, and wi-fi and cellular signals interfere with our cell-to-cell communication. Studies show wi-fi causes the cell membrane to leak, which produces a very destructive free radical and can contribute to cancer. Wi-Fi also has been shown to interfere with melatonin's ability to clean up free radicals. Other damages shown in the 1000s of studies performed: compromising the blood-brain-barrier (which keeps toxins out of the brain); cellular communication interference; damage to cell metabolism; single-and double-strand DNA damage; loss of DNA repair capacity in human stem cells; reduction in free-radical scavengers (particularly melatonin); abnormal gene transcription; neurotoxicity; carcinogenicity; damage to sperm morphology and function; and effects on behavior. This causes real damage to accumulate, especially in the small bodies of children. U.S. wireless radiation standards (set 20 years ago) based on a 6-foot, 200 pound healthy male? Why have no field studies been performed on children - and the child brain overall absorbs twice as much radiation as that of an adult, and their bone marrow absorbs 10x that of an adult. The following experts have said: • Dr. David Carpenter, M.D., public health physician educated at Harvard Medical School: "RF penetration is greater relative to head size in children, and they have a greater absorption of RF energy in the tissues of the head at WI-FI frequencies because their skulls area thinner, their brains are smaller, and their brain tissue is more conductive than that of adults since it has a higher water content and ion concentrations….Thus it is important that all of us, and especially children, restrict our use of cell phones, and limit exposure to background levels of WI-FI.” • Dr. Keith Black, Neurosurgeon, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center: “In children, the microwave radiation can penetrate deeper into the…

Read the full comment →

26110082640

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082640

26110082639

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082639