Reduced growth of soybean seedlings after exposure to weak microwave radiation from GSM 900 mobile phone and base station.
← Research streamAfter 2 h exposure at 900 MHz, higher-amplitude GSM pulsed radiation (41 V/m) diminished epicotyl outgrowth, while lower-amplitude GSM (5.7 V/m) did not affect epicotyl, hypocotyls, or roots. For 2 h continuous-wave (CW) exposure, higher amplitude reduced roo…
Study snapshot
Abstract
The aim of this work was to study possible effects of environmental radiation pollution on plants. The association between cellular telephone (short duration, higher amplitude) and base station (long duration, very low amplitude) radiation exposure and the growth rate of soybean (Glycine max) seedlings was investigated. Soybean seedlings, pre-grown for 4 days, were exposed in a gigahertz transverse electromagnetic cell for 2 h to global system for mobile communication (GSM) mobile phone pulsed radiation or continuous wave (CW) radiation at 900 MHz with amplitudes of 5.7 and 41 V m(-1) , and outgrowth was studied one week after exposure. The exposure to higher amplitude (41 V m(-1)) GSM radiation resulted in diminished outgrowth of the epicotyl. The exposure to lower amplitude (5.7 V m(-1)) GSM radiation did not influence outgrowth of epicotyl, hypocotyls, or roots. The exposure to higher amplitude CW radiation resulted in reduced outgrowth of the roots whereas lower CW exposure resulted in a reduced outgrowth of the hypocotyl. Soybean seedlings were also exposed for 5 days to an extremely low level of radiation (GSM 900 MHz, 0.56 V m(-1)) and outgrowth was studied 2 days later. Growth of epicotyl and hypocotyl was found to be reduced, whereas the outgrowth of roots was stimulated. Our findings indicate that the observed effects were significantly dependent on field strength as well as amplitude modulation of the applied field.
AI evidence extraction
Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.
Main findings
After 2 h exposure at 900 MHz, higher-amplitude GSM pulsed radiation (41 V/m) diminished epicotyl outgrowth, while lower-amplitude GSM (5.7 V/m) did not affect epicotyl, hypocotyls, or roots. For 2 h continuous-wave (CW) exposure, higher amplitude reduced root outgrowth and lower amplitude reduced hypocotyl outgrowth. After 5 days very low-level GSM exposure (0.56 V/m), epicotyl and hypocotyl growth were reduced while root outgrowth was stimulated; effects depended on field strength and modulation.
Outcomes measured
- Seedling growth/outgrowth (epicotyl, hypocotyl, roots)
Limitations
- Sample size not reported in abstract
- Exposure quantified in V/m; SAR not reported
- Timing of outcome assessment varies (1 week after 2 h exposure; 2 days after 5-day exposure)
- Plant model; generalizability to humans not addressed
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "animal",
"exposure": {
"band": "RF",
"source": "mobile phone, base station",
"frequency_mhz": 900,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": "2 h (acute) and 5 days (chronic)"
},
"population": "Soybean (Glycine max) seedlings (pre-grown 4 days)",
"sample_size": null,
"outcomes": [
"Seedling growth/outgrowth (epicotyl, hypocotyl, roots)"
],
"main_findings": "After 2 h exposure at 900 MHz, higher-amplitude GSM pulsed radiation (41 V/m) diminished epicotyl outgrowth, while lower-amplitude GSM (5.7 V/m) did not affect epicotyl, hypocotyls, or roots. For 2 h continuous-wave (CW) exposure, higher amplitude reduced root outgrowth and lower amplitude reduced hypocotyl outgrowth. After 5 days very low-level GSM exposure (0.56 V/m), epicotyl and hypocotyl growth were reduced while root outgrowth was stimulated; effects depended on field strength and modulation.",
"effect_direction": "mixed",
"limitations": [
"Sample size not reported in abstract",
"Exposure quantified in V/m; SAR not reported",
"Timing of outcome assessment varies (1 week after 2 h exposure; 2 days after 5-day exposure)",
"Plant model; generalizability to humans not addressed"
],
"evidence_strength": "low",
"confidence": 0.74,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"GSM",
"900 MHz",
"microwave radiation",
"radiofrequency",
"mobile phone",
"base station",
"continuous wave",
"pulsed radiation",
"field strength",
"soybean seedlings",
"plant growth",
"epicotyl",
"hypocotyl",
"roots"
],
"suggested_hubs": [
{
"slug": "5g-policy",
"weight": 0,
"reason": null
}
]
}AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.
Identifiers and source
DOI: 10.1002/bem.21890
PubMed: 25644316
Related papers
- Follow-Up Research on NTP’s Clear Evidence on RF Causing Malignant Tumors in Rats 2024
- Indirect effects of interference of two emerging environmental contaminants on cell health: Radiofrequency radiation and gold nanoparticles 2023
- Theta band brainwaves in human resting EEG modulated by mobile phone radiofrequency 2023
- Effects of continuous prenatal and postnatal global system for mobile communications electromagnetic waves (GSM-EMW) exposure on the oxidative stress biomarkers in female rat liver 2022
- Pre-Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields and Induction of Radioadaptive Response in Rats Irradiated with High Doses of X-Rays 2022
- Investigation of oxidative damage, antioxidant balance, DNA repair genes, and apoptosis due to radiofrequency-induced adaptive response in mice 2022