Pre-Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields and Induction of Radioadaptive Response in Rats Irradiated with High Doses of X-Rays

2022 · Mixed · Low evidence

← Research stream
MixedLow evidencePaper 653

In survival analysis, survival rates in all exposed groups (8 Gy X-rays, mobile phone+8 Gy, Wi-Fi+8 Gy) were significantly lower than control and RF-only groups, and survival differences among the three irradiated groups were not statistically significant. Fo…

Study snapshot

Publicationmanual · 2022
Study typecase_control
Reported directionMixed
Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

Pre-Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields and Induction of Radioadaptive Response in Rats Irradiated with High Doses of X-Rays Borzoueisileh S, Shabestani Monfared A, Mortazavi SMJ, Zabihi E, Pouramir M, Niksirat F, Seyfizadeh N, Shafiee M. Pre-Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields and Induction of Radioadaptive Response in Rats Irradiated with High Doses of X-Rays. J Biomed Phys Eng. 2022 Oct 1;12(5):505-512. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.1271. Abstract Background: Some evidence shows that a pre-exposure to RF can mitigate the effects of subsequent exposures to high doses of ionizing radiation. Objective: We aimed to assess the effect of a pre-exposure to non-ionizing RF radiation on survival, weight changes, food consumption, and water intake of lethally irradiated rats. Material and methods: In this case-control study, we used a commercial mobile phone (GSM, 900/1800 MHz) as well as a 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi router as the sources of pre-exposure to RF radiation. Forty-eight rats were randomly divided into six groups of control, "8 Gy X-rays", mobile phone, "mobile phone+8 Gy", Wi-Fi, and "Wi-Fi+8 Gy". Then, the survival fraction, weight loss, water, and food consumption changes were compared in different groups. Results: The survival analysis indicated that the survival rates in all of the exposed animals ("8 Gy X-rays", "mobile phone+8 Gy", "Wi-Fi+8 Gy") were significantly lower than the control, "Wi-Fi", and "mobile phone" groups. The changes in survival rates of "mobile+8 Gy", "Wi-Fi+8 Gy", and 8 Gy alone were not statistically significant. However, food and water intake were significantly affected by exposure to both RF pre-exposures and exposure to high dose ionizing radiation. Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, the existence of a dose window for the induction of AR [adaptive response] can be the cause of the lack of AR in our experiment. Our findings confirm that in a similar pattern with the adaptive responses induced by pre-exposure to ionizing radiation, the induction of adaptive response by RF-pre-exposures requires a minimum level of damage to trigger adaptive phenomena. Open access paper: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typecase_control
Effect directionmixed
PopulationRats
Sample size48
ExposureRF
Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 74% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

In survival analysis, survival rates in all exposed groups (8 Gy X-rays, mobile phone+8 Gy, Wi-Fi+8 Gy) were significantly lower than control and RF-only groups, and survival differences among the three irradiated groups were not statistically significant. Food and water intake were significantly affected by both RF pre-exposures and high-dose ionizing radiation.

Outcomes measured

  • Survival fraction/rate
  • Weight changes/weight loss
  • Food consumption/intake
  • Water intake

Limitations

  • RF exposure duration not reported in abstract
  • RF exposure level/SAR not reported in abstract
  • Details of randomization and blinding not described in abstract
  • Animal study; generalizability to humans is uncertain
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "case_control",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "RF",
    "source": "mobile phone; wi-fi router",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": "Rats",
  "sample_size": 48,
  "outcomes": [
    "Survival fraction/rate",
    "Weight changes/weight loss",
    "Food consumption/intake",
    "Water intake"
  ],
  "main_findings": "In survival analysis, survival rates in all exposed groups (8 Gy X-rays, mobile phone+8 Gy, Wi-Fi+8 Gy) were significantly lower than control and RF-only groups, and survival differences among the three irradiated groups were not statistically significant. Food and water intake were significantly affected by both RF pre-exposures and high-dose ionizing radiation.",
  "effect_direction": "mixed",
  "limitations": [
    "RF exposure duration not reported in abstract",
    "RF exposure level/SAR not reported in abstract",
    "Details of randomization and blinding not described in abstract",
    "Animal study; generalizability to humans is uncertain"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.74,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "radiofrequency",
    "RF",
    "GSM",
    "900 MHz",
    "1800 MHz",
    "Wi-Fi",
    "2.4 GHz",
    "radioadaptive response",
    "adaptive response",
    "X-rays",
    "8 Gy",
    "rats",
    "survival",
    "food intake",
    "water intake",
    "weight loss"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "school-wi-fi",
      "weight": 0.35,
      "reason": "Uses a 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi router as an RF exposure source (though in an animal experiment)."
    }
  ]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.1271
PubMed: Not supplied

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library