Responsive behavior of regenerated cellulose in hydrolysis under microwave radiation.

Bioresource technology · 2014 · Unclear · Insufficient evidence

← Research stream
UnclearInsufficient evidencePaper 6559

In step-by-step hydrolysis of regenerated cellulose under microwave radiation, crystallinity (Cr) was reported as a key factor affecting reactivity; increasing Cr during hydrolysis (via amorphous-region hydrolysis and recrystallization) weakened reactivity an…

Study snapshot

PublicationBioresource technology · 2014
Study typeother
Reported directionUnclear
Evidence ratingInsufficient

Abstract

This work studied the responsive behavior of regenerated cellulose (RC) in hydrolysis under microwave radiation. Four types of RC with different crystallinity (Cr) and degree of polymerization (DP) are produced to evaluate the reactivity of RC by step-by-step hydrolysis. Results show Cr is the key factor to affect the reactivity of RCs. With hydrolysis of amorphous region and the formation of recrystallization, the Cr of RC reaches a high value and thus weakens the reactivity. As a result, the increment of cellulose conversion and sugar yield gradually reduces. Decrease of the DP of RC is helpful to increase the speed at the onset of hydrolysis and produce high sugar yield. But, there is no direct influence with the reactivity of RC to prolong the time of pretreatment. This research provides an accurate understanding to guide the RC preparation for sugar formation with relative high efficiency under mild reaction conditions.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeother
Effect directionunclear
PopulationNot supplied
Sample sizeNot supplied
ExposureNot supplied
Evidence strengthInsufficientConfidence: 66% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

In step-by-step hydrolysis of regenerated cellulose under microwave radiation, crystallinity (Cr) was reported as a key factor affecting reactivity; increasing Cr during hydrolysis (via amorphous-region hydrolysis and recrystallization) weakened reactivity and reduced incremental gains in conversion and sugar yield. Lower degree of polymerization (DP) increased the initial hydrolysis speed and enabled higher sugar yield, while prolonging pretreatment time was reported to have no direct influence on reactivity.

Outcomes measured

  • cellulose hydrolysis reactivity
  • cellulose conversion
  • sugar yield
  • crystallinity (Cr) changes
  • degree of polymerization (DP) effects
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "other",
  "exposure": {
    "band": null,
    "source": "microwave radiation",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": null,
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "cellulose hydrolysis reactivity",
    "cellulose conversion",
    "sugar yield",
    "crystallinity (Cr) changes",
    "degree of polymerization (DP) effects"
  ],
  "main_findings": "In step-by-step hydrolysis of regenerated cellulose under microwave radiation, crystallinity (Cr) was reported as a key factor affecting reactivity; increasing Cr during hydrolysis (via amorphous-region hydrolysis and recrystallization) weakened reactivity and reduced incremental gains in conversion and sugar yield. Lower degree of polymerization (DP) increased the initial hydrolysis speed and enabled higher sugar yield, while prolonging pretreatment time was reported to have no direct influence on reactivity.",
  "effect_direction": "unclear",
  "limitations": [],
  "evidence_strength": "insufficient",
  "confidence": 0.66,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "microwave radiation",
    "regenerated cellulose",
    "hydrolysis",
    "crystallinity",
    "degree of polymerization",
    "cellulose conversion",
    "sugar yield",
    "recrystallization"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": []
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.05.066
PubMed: 24971946

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library