Microstructure and electrical property of TiNx films deposited by DC reactive magnetron sputtering superimposed electromagnetic field system.

Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology · 2012 · Benefit · Insufficient evidence

← Research stream
BenefitInsufficient evidencePaper 4525

TiNx (TiN) films deposited using DC reactive magnetron sputtering with a superimposed EMF system showed improved electrical properties, reflectance, and crystallinity compared with the stated DCMS+EMF condition, attributed to enhanced nitrification. The lowes…

Study snapshot

PublicationJournal of nanoscience and nanotechnology · 2012
Study typeengineering
Reported directionBenefit
Evidence ratingInsufficient

Abstract

TiNx films were successfully deposited by DC reactive magnetron sputtering superimposed EMF system without substrate heating. In case of DCMS 400 W+ EMF 25 W, electrical property, reflectance and crystallinity of the TiN films were clearly improved by the enhancement of nitrification. The lowest sheet resistance of 2.9 Ω/⟂ (resistivity 5.8 x 10(-5) Ωcm) was observed for the film deposited at F(N)2: 16%. Mixture phases of the (111) plane and (200) plane showed lower resistivity than only (200) single phase. Therefore it is confirmed that introduction of EMF system is promising technology to deposit TiN film.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeengineering
Effect directionbenefit
PopulationNot supplied
Sample sizeNot supplied
ExposureNot supplied
Evidence strengthInsufficientConfidence: 74% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

TiNx (TiN) films deposited using DC reactive magnetron sputtering with a superimposed EMF system showed improved electrical properties, reflectance, and crystallinity compared with the stated DCMS+EMF condition, attributed to enhanced nitrification. The lowest sheet resistance reported was 2.9 Ω/⟂ (resistivity 5.8 × 10^-5 Ω·cm) at F(N)2 = 16%, and mixed (111)/(200) phases had lower resistivity than a (200) single phase.

Outcomes measured

  • TiNx/TiN film microstructure
  • electrical properties (sheet resistance, resistivity)
  • reflectance
  • crystallinity
  • nitrification

Limitations

  • No EMF frequency, field strength, or exposure characterization details provided in the abstract
  • No sample size or number of films/replicates stated
  • Engineering/materials outcomes only; no biological or health endpoints
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "engineering",
  "exposure": {
    "band": null,
    "source": "superimposed electromagnetic field system (during DC reactive magnetron sputtering)",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": null,
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "TiNx/TiN film microstructure",
    "electrical properties (sheet resistance, resistivity)",
    "reflectance",
    "crystallinity",
    "nitrification"
  ],
  "main_findings": "TiNx (TiN) films deposited using DC reactive magnetron sputtering with a superimposed EMF system showed improved electrical properties, reflectance, and crystallinity compared with the stated DCMS+EMF condition, attributed to enhanced nitrification. The lowest sheet resistance reported was 2.9 Ω/⟂ (resistivity 5.8 × 10^-5 Ω·cm) at F(N)2 = 16%, and mixed (111)/(200) phases had lower resistivity than a (200) single phase.",
  "effect_direction": "benefit",
  "limitations": [
    "No EMF frequency, field strength, or exposure characterization details provided in the abstract",
    "No sample size or number of films/replicates stated",
    "Engineering/materials outcomes only; no biological or health endpoints"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "insufficient",
  "confidence": 0.74,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "TiNx",
    "TiN",
    "DC reactive magnetron sputtering",
    "superimposed EMF system",
    "nitrification",
    "sheet resistance",
    "resistivity",
    "crystallinity",
    "reflectance"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": []
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1166/jnn.2012.4600
PubMed: 22629939

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library