Transcriptome profiling of flax plants exposed to a low-frequency alternating electromagnetic field.

Frontiers in genetics · 2023 · Unclear · Insufficient evidence

← Research stream
UnclearInsufficient evidencePaper 5789

All living organisms on Earth evolved in the presence of an electromagnetic field (EMF), adapted to the environment of EMF, and even learned to utilize it for their purposes. However, during the last century, the Earth's core lost its exclusivity, and many EM…

Study snapshot

PublicationFrontiers in genetics · 2023
Study typeother
Reported directionUnclear
Evidence ratingInsufficient

Abstract

All living organisms on Earth evolved in the presence of an electromagnetic field (EMF), adapted to the environment of EMF, and even learned to utilize it for their purposes. However, during the last century, the Earth's core lost its exclusivity, and many EMF sources appeared due to the development of electricity and electronics. Previous research suggested that the EMF led to changes in intercellular free radical homeostasis and further altered the expression of genes involved in plant response to environmental stresses, inorganic ion transport, and cell wall constituent biosynthesis. Later, CTCT sequence motifs in gene promoters were proposed to be responsible for the response to EMF. How these motifs or different mechanisms are involved in the plant reaction to external EMF remains unknown. Moreover, as many genes activated under EMF treatment do not have the CTCT repeats in their promoters, we aimed to determine the transcription profile of a plant exposed to an EMF and identify the genes that are directly involved in response to the treatment to find the common denominator of the observed changes in the plant transcriptome.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeother
Effect directionunclear
PopulationFlax plants
Sample sizeNot supplied
ExposureELF
Evidence strengthInsufficientConfidence: 62% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

All living organisms on Earth evolved in the presence of an electromagnetic field (EMF), adapted to the environment of EMF, and even learned to utilize it for their purposes. However, during the last century, the Earth's core lost its exclusivity, and many EM…

Outcomes measured

  • Plant transcriptome/gene expression changes under EMF exposure
  • Identification of genes involved in response to EMF treatment
  • Promoter motif involvement (CTCT repeats) in EMF response

Limitations

  • No exposure parameters provided (e.g., frequency, field strength, duration).
  • No results reported in the provided abstract excerpt.
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "other",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "ELF",
    "source": null,
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": "Flax plants",
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "Plant transcriptome/gene expression changes under EMF exposure",
    "Identification of genes involved in response to EMF treatment",
    "Promoter motif involvement (CTCT repeats) in EMF response"
  ],
  "main_findings": null,
  "effect_direction": "unclear",
  "limitations": [
    "No exposure parameters provided (e.g., frequency, field strength, duration).",
    "No results reported in the provided abstract excerpt."
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "insufficient",
  "confidence": 0.62,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "flax",
    "plant",
    "transcriptome profiling",
    "gene expression",
    "low-frequency alternating electromagnetic field",
    "EMF",
    "CTCT promoter motif"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": []
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1205469
PubMed: 37351344

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library