The Effect of Low-Frequency Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields on the Differentiation of Permanent Dental Pulp Stem Cells into Odontoblasts.
← Research streamAcross exposure groups, cell survival/proliferation was significantly higher than control except for the 40 minutes/day, 1 mT group. The highest survival was reported for 20 minutes/day at 0.5 mT.
Study snapshot
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Exposure to pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) has been revealed to affect the differentiation and proliferation of human mesenchymal stem cells derived from dental pulp multipotent stromal stem cells (DP-MSCs). This study aimed to investigate the differentiation effect of electromagnetic fields (EMFs) on the DP-MSC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PEMF was produced by a system comprising a multi-meter autotransformer, solenoid coils, and teslameter. This study included 10 groups of DP-MSCs which underwent different electromagnetic radiation time and beam intensity. Three samples tested for each group. The effect of PEMF with the intensity of 0.5 and 1 mT (mili Tesla) and 50 Hz on the proliferation rate of DP-MSC was evaluated at 20 and 40 minutes per day for seven days. MTT assay was applied to determine the growth and proliferation of DP-MSC. Gene expression of DMP1 for differentiation of DPSCs to odontoblasts was confirmed by Real Time PCR., ANOVA statistical analysis and Kruskal-Wallis test were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: The survival in all exposure groups was significantly higher than that in control except in the group of 40 minutes, 1 mT (<0.05). In 20 minutes, 0.5 mT exposure, the survival intensity is significantly more than others (<0.05). In general, the intensity of survival was recorded, 20, 0.5 mT≥20, 1 mT≥40, 0.5 mT≥40, 1 mT respectively. Therefore, according to the obtained results, ELF-EMF increases the survival of cells except for one case (40 minutes, 1 mT), even though the effective underlying mechanisms in this process are still unclear. CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained promise that in the future, by placing an important part of the pulp next to the electromagnetic field, the lost part of the pulp can be reconstructed and the dentin barrier can be created.
AI evidence extraction
Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.
Main findings
Across exposure groups, cell survival/proliferation was significantly higher than control except for the 40 minutes/day, 1 mT group. The highest survival was reported for 20 minutes/day at 0.5 mT.
Outcomes measured
- DP-MSC proliferation/survival (MTT assay)
- Differentiation marker gene expression (DMP1 by Real Time PCR)
Limitations
- In vitro study (dental pulp mesenchymal stem cells)
- Only three samples tested per group
- Mechanisms described as unclear in the abstract
- Differentiation outcome reporting is limited in the abstract (DMP1 mentioned as assessed/confirmed, but results not quantified)
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "in_vitro",
"exposure": {
"band": "ELF",
"source": "pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) exposure system with solenoid coils",
"frequency_mhz": null,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": "20 or 40 minutes per day for seven days"
},
"population": null,
"sample_size": 30,
"outcomes": [
"DP-MSC proliferation/survival (MTT assay)",
"Differentiation marker gene expression (DMP1 by Real Time PCR)"
],
"main_findings": "Across exposure groups, cell survival/proliferation was significantly higher than control except for the 40 minutes/day, 1 mT group. The highest survival was reported for 20 minutes/day at 0.5 mT.",
"effect_direction": "mixed",
"limitations": [
"In vitro study (dental pulp mesenchymal stem cells)",
"Only three samples tested per group",
"Mechanisms described as unclear in the abstract",
"Differentiation outcome reporting is limited in the abstract (DMP1 mentioned as assessed/confirmed, but results not quantified)"
],
"evidence_strength": "very_low",
"confidence": 0.74,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"pulsed electromagnetic field",
"PEMF",
"ELF-EMF",
"50 Hz",
"0.5 mT",
"1 mT",
"dental pulp mesenchymal stem cells",
"DP-MSC",
"DPSC",
"odontoblast",
"DMP1",
"MTT assay"
],
"suggested_hubs": []
}AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.
Identifiers and source
DOI: 10.22037/iej.v18i4.39349
PubMed: 37829830
Related papers
- Is extremely low frequency pulsed electromagnetic fields (EMF) applicable to gliomas? A literature review of underlying mechanisms and application of extremely low frequency pulsed EMF 2022
- Evaluation of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Effects: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Highlights of Two Decades of Research In Vitro Studies 2021
- The Effect of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields on Angiogenesis 2021
- Effects of pulsed EMF on learning and memory abilities of STZ-induced dementia rats 2019
- Effect of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial 2014
- Pulsed electromagnetic field and exercises in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial 2014