Local vasodilator response to mobile phones.
← Research streamDuring a 30-minute 900 MHz mobile phone conversation, skin temperature increased on the same side as the phone (max +2.3 ± 0.2°C at 6 min), nasal NO showed a tendency to increase (max +12.9 ± 4.9% at 10 min), and MCA was significantly reduced (max −27 ± 6% at…
Study snapshot
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The use of mobile phones with the resulting generation of potentially harmful electromagnetic fields (EMF) is the focus of public interest. Heat generation and the activation of the inducible form of nitric oxide (NO) synthase may be possible causes of the biological effects of EMF exposure. We investigated if a mobile telephone conversation can modify skin temperature, NO, and nasal resistance. METHODS: We studied the effect of an EMF (900 MHz) generated by a commercially available cellular phone during a 30-minute telephone conversation on skin temperature, nasal NO measured by chemiluminescence, and nasal minimal cross-sectional area (MCA) measured by rhinometry. Eleven normal subjects (mean age +/- standard error of mean [SEM], 32 +/- 5 y; 10 male) were studied. RESULTS: There was a similar and significant increase in skin temperature of the nostril and occipital area on the same side as the telephone (maximal increase 2.3 +/- 0.2 degrees C at 6 min) as well as a tendency for higher nasal NO levels (maximal increase 12.9 +/- 4.9% at 10 min), whereas the MCA was significantly reduced (maximal decrease -27 +/- 6% at 15 min). Such changes were not recorded when an earpiece was used to avoid the direct exposure to the electromagnetic field. There were no changes in the skin temperature and nasal NO measured on the opposite side to the mobile phone, whereas the MCA was significantly increased (38 +/- 10%). CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to EMF produced by a mobile phone produces biological effects that can be easily measured. Microwaves may increase skin temperature and therefore cause vasodilation and reduce MCA. Further studies are needed to study the long-term effects of mobile phone use and the relation among NO production, vasodilation, and temperature.
AI evidence extraction
Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.
Main findings
During a 30-minute 900 MHz mobile phone conversation, skin temperature increased on the same side as the phone (max +2.3 ± 0.2°C at 6 min), nasal NO showed a tendency to increase (max +12.9 ± 4.9% at 10 min), and MCA was significantly reduced (max −27 ± 6% at 15 min). These changes were not recorded when an earpiece was used to avoid direct EMF exposure; on the opposite side, skin temperature and nasal NO did not change while MCA significantly increased (38 ± 10%).
Outcomes measured
- Skin temperature (nostril/occipital area)
- Nasal nitric oxide (NO) levels (chemiluminescence)
- Nasal minimal cross-sectional area (MCA) / nasal resistance (rhinometry)
Limitations
- Small sample size (n=11)
- Short-term exposure only (30 minutes)
- NO change described as a tendency (unclear statistical significance)
- No SAR or detailed exposure characterization beyond frequency and phone use
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "other",
"exposure": {
"band": "RF",
"source": "mobile phone",
"frequency_mhz": 900,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": "30-minute telephone conversation"
},
"population": "11 normal subjects (mean age 32 ± 5 y; 10 male)",
"sample_size": 11,
"outcomes": [
"Skin temperature (nostril/occipital area)",
"Nasal nitric oxide (NO) levels (chemiluminescence)",
"Nasal minimal cross-sectional area (MCA) / nasal resistance (rhinometry)"
],
"main_findings": "During a 30-minute 900 MHz mobile phone conversation, skin temperature increased on the same side as the phone (max +2.3 ± 0.2°C at 6 min), nasal NO showed a tendency to increase (max +12.9 ± 4.9% at 10 min), and MCA was significantly reduced (max −27 ± 6% at 15 min). These changes were not recorded when an earpiece was used to avoid direct EMF exposure; on the opposite side, skin temperature and nasal NO did not change while MCA significantly increased (38 ± 10%).",
"effect_direction": "mixed",
"limitations": [
"Small sample size (n=11)",
"Short-term exposure only (30 minutes)",
"NO change described as a tendency (unclear statistical significance)",
"No SAR or detailed exposure characterization beyond frequency and phone use"
],
"evidence_strength": "very_low",
"confidence": 0.74,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"mobile phone",
"EMF",
"900 MHz",
"microwaves",
"skin temperature",
"vasodilation",
"nasal nitric oxide",
"rhinometry",
"minimal cross-sectional area"
],
"suggested_hubs": []
}AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.
Identifiers and source
DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200101000-00027
PubMed: 11192886
Related papers
- Analyzing the impact of 900 MHz EMF short-term exposure to the expression of 667 miRNAs in human peripheral blood cells 2021
- Protective role of spermine against male reproductive aberrations induced by EMF exposure in the rat 2019
- Cellular stress & caspase-3 resulting from combined two-frequency signal in brains of Sprague-Dawley rats 2016
- Electric and magnetic fields do not modify the biochemical properties of FRTL-5 cells. 2011
- GFAP expression in the rat brain following sub-chronic exposure to a 900 MHz electromagnetic field signal. 2010
- Effect of extract on apoptosis in the rat cerebellum, following prenatal and postnatal exposure to an electromagnetic field. 2013