Cell type-specific genotoxic effects of intermittent extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields.

Mutation research · 2005 · Mixed · Low evidence

← Research stream
MixedLow evidencePaper 5181

Cultured cells from different tissues were exposed to intermittent 50 Hz, 1 mT ELF-EMF for 1–24 h and assessed with alkaline and neutral comet assays. Three cell types were identified as responders (human fibroblasts, human melanocytes, rat granulosa cells) a…

Study snapshot

PublicationMutation research · 2005
Study typein_vitro
Reported directionMixed
Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

The issue of adverse health effects of extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF-EMFs) is highly controversial. Contradictory results regarding the genotoxic potential of ELF-EMF have been reported in the literature. To test whether this controversy might reflect differences between the cellular targets examined we exposed cultured cells derived from different tissues to an intermittent ELF-EMF (50 Hz sinusoidal, 1 mT) for 1-24h. The alkaline and neutral comet assays were used to assess ELF-EMF-induced DNA strand breaks. We could identify three responder (human fibroblasts, human melanocytes, rat granulosa cells) and three non-responder cell types (human lymphocytes, human monocytes, human skeletal muscle cells), which points to the significance of the cell system used when investigating genotoxic effects of ELF-EMF.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typein_vitro
Effect directionmixed
PopulationNot supplied
Sample sizeNot supplied
ExposureELF · 0.05 MHz · 1–24 h (intermittent exposure)
Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 78% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

Cultured cells from different tissues were exposed to intermittent 50 Hz, 1 mT ELF-EMF for 1–24 h and assessed with alkaline and neutral comet assays. Three cell types were identified as responders (human fibroblasts, human melanocytes, rat granulosa cells) and three as non-responders (human lymphocytes, human monocytes, human skeletal muscle cells), suggesting cell type-specific differences in ELF-EMF-associated DNA strand breaks.

Outcomes measured

  • DNA strand breaks (alkaline comet assay)
  • DNA strand breaks (neutral comet assay)

Limitations

  • In vitro study in cultured cells; generalizability to in vivo human health effects is not addressed in the abstract.
  • Sample sizes and statistical details are not provided in the abstract.
  • Only DNA strand breaks assessed via comet assays; other genotoxic endpoints not described.
  • Exposure described as intermittent but duty cycle/pattern not specified in the abstract.
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "in_vitro",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "ELF",
    "source": null,
    "frequency_mhz": 0.05,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": "1–24 h (intermittent exposure)"
  },
  "population": null,
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "DNA strand breaks (alkaline comet assay)",
    "DNA strand breaks (neutral comet assay)"
  ],
  "main_findings": "Cultured cells from different tissues were exposed to intermittent 50 Hz, 1 mT ELF-EMF for 1–24 h and assessed with alkaline and neutral comet assays. Three cell types were identified as responders (human fibroblasts, human melanocytes, rat granulosa cells) and three as non-responders (human lymphocytes, human monocytes, human skeletal muscle cells), suggesting cell type-specific differences in ELF-EMF-associated DNA strand breaks.",
  "effect_direction": "mixed",
  "limitations": [
    "In vitro study in cultured cells; generalizability to in vivo human health effects is not addressed in the abstract.",
    "Sample sizes and statistical details are not provided in the abstract.",
    "Only DNA strand breaks assessed via comet assays; other genotoxic endpoints not described.",
    "Exposure described as intermittent but duty cycle/pattern not specified in the abstract."
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.78,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields",
    "ELF-EMF",
    "50 Hz",
    "1 mT",
    "intermittent exposure",
    "genotoxicity",
    "DNA strand breaks",
    "comet assay",
    "cell type-specific effects",
    "human fibroblasts",
    "human melanocytes",
    "rat granulosa cells",
    "human lymphocytes",
    "human monocytes",
    "human skeletal muscle cells"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "occupational-exposure",
      "weight": 0.2,
      "reason": "Study involves ELF (50 Hz) exposure relevant to occupational/environmental ELF discussions, though conducted in vitro and not tied to a specific workplace source."
    }
  ]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2005.03.011
PubMed: 15899587

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library