Age-related effects on induction of DNA strand breaks by intermittent exposure to electromagnetic fields.

Mechanisms of ageing and development · 2003 · Harm · Low evidence

← Research stream
HarmLow evidencePaper 5271

Cultured fibroblasts exposed to intermittent 50 Hz (1 mT) ELF-EMF for 1–24 h showed basal DNA strand break levels that correlated with donor age. A maximum response occurred at 15–19 h and was more pronounced in cells from older donors.

Study snapshot

PublicationMechanisms of ageing and development · 2003
Study typein_vitro
Reported directionHarm
Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

Several studies indicating a decline of DNA repair efficiency with age raise the question, if senescence per se leads to a higher susceptibility to DNA damage upon environmental exposures. Cultured fibroblasts of six healthy donors of different age exposed to intermittent ELF-EMF (50 Hz sinus, 1 mT) for 1-24 h exhibited different basal DNA strand break levels correlating with age. The cells revealed a maximum response at 15-19 h of exposure. This response was clearly more pronounced in cells from older donors, which could point to an age-related decrease of DNA repair efficiency of ELF-EMF induced DNA strand breaks.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typein_vitro
Effect directionharm
PopulationCultured fibroblasts from six healthy human donors of different age
Sample size6
ExposureELF · 0.05 MHz · 1–24 h (maximum response at 15–19 h); intermittent exposure
Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 78% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

Cultured fibroblasts exposed to intermittent 50 Hz (1 mT) ELF-EMF for 1–24 h showed basal DNA strand break levels that correlated with donor age. A maximum response occurred at 15–19 h and was more pronounced in cells from older donors.

Outcomes measured

  • DNA strand breaks
  • Basal DNA strand break levels
  • Age-related differences in response to ELF-EMF exposure

Limitations

  • In vitro study (cultured fibroblasts), not an in vivo or clinical outcome
  • Small donor sample (six donors)
  • Mechanism (DNA repair efficiency) is suggested but not directly demonstrated in the abstract
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "in_vitro",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "ELF",
    "source": null,
    "frequency_mhz": 0.05,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": "1–24 h (maximum response at 15–19 h); intermittent exposure"
  },
  "population": "Cultured fibroblasts from six healthy human donors of different age",
  "sample_size": 6,
  "outcomes": [
    "DNA strand breaks",
    "Basal DNA strand break levels",
    "Age-related differences in response to ELF-EMF exposure"
  ],
  "main_findings": "Cultured fibroblasts exposed to intermittent 50 Hz (1 mT) ELF-EMF for 1–24 h showed basal DNA strand break levels that correlated with donor age. A maximum response occurred at 15–19 h and was more pronounced in cells from older donors.",
  "effect_direction": "harm",
  "limitations": [
    "In vitro study (cultured fibroblasts), not an in vivo or clinical outcome",
    "Small donor sample (six donors)",
    "Mechanism (DNA repair efficiency) is suggested but not directly demonstrated in the abstract"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.78,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "ELF-EMF",
    "50 Hz",
    "1 mT",
    "intermittent exposure",
    "fibroblasts",
    "DNA strand breaks",
    "age-related effects",
    "DNA repair"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "who-icnirp",
      "weight": 0.2,
      "reason": "Study concerns ELF-EMF exposure and DNA damage, relevant to EMF health risk assessment discussions."
    }
  ]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1016/s0047-6374(03)00125-8
PubMed: 12875748

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library