[Study on human sensitivity of extremely low frequency electromagnetic field].

Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2000 · Harm · Very low evidence

← Research stream
HarmVery low evidencePaper 3960

A theoretical calculation/analysis based on a "crowd model" suggests membrane action potential could be amplified under certain parameter conditions (k1, k2), potentially increasing ionic current and leading to electroporation or membrane breakage. The author…

Study snapshot

PublicationSheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2000
Study typeother
Reported directionHarm
Evidence ratingVery low

Abstract

In this paper, the action potential through membrane is calculated and analyzed based on the crowd model. The analysis shows that membrane action potential will be amplified if the coefficient k1, k2 meet some certain conditions. This effect could cause ionic current increase and even results in electroporation, membrane broken. The result can be used to explain some athermal bioeffect of living beings in weak EMF and is helpful for biomedicine application.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeother
Effect directionharm
PopulationNot supplied
Sample sizeNot supplied
ExposureELF
Evidence strengthVery lowConfidence: 62% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

A theoretical calculation/analysis based on a "crowd model" suggests membrane action potential could be amplified under certain parameter conditions (k1, k2), potentially increasing ionic current and leading to electroporation or membrane breakage. The authors state this may help explain athermal bioeffects in weak EMF and could be useful for biomedical applications.

Outcomes measured

  • membrane action potential amplification
  • ionic current increase
  • electroporation/membrane damage (theoretical)

Limitations

  • Appears to be a theoretical/modeling analysis; no experimental exposure measurements or biological/clinical endpoints reported in the abstract
  • Exposure characteristics (frequency, field strength, duration, source) are not specified in the abstract
  • Parameter conditions (k1, k2) are not defined in the abstract, limiting interpretability
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "other",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "ELF",
    "source": null,
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": null,
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "membrane action potential amplification",
    "ionic current increase",
    "electroporation/membrane damage (theoretical)"
  ],
  "main_findings": "A theoretical calculation/analysis based on a \"crowd model\" suggests membrane action potential could be amplified under certain parameter conditions (k1, k2), potentially increasing ionic current and leading to electroporation or membrane breakage. The authors state this may help explain athermal bioeffects in weak EMF and could be useful for biomedical applications.",
  "effect_direction": "harm",
  "limitations": [
    "Appears to be a theoretical/modeling analysis; no experimental exposure measurements or biological/clinical endpoints reported in the abstract",
    "Exposure characteristics (frequency, field strength, duration, source) are not specified in the abstract",
    "Parameter conditions (k1, k2) are not defined in the abstract, limiting interpretability"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "very_low",
  "confidence": 0.62,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "extremely low frequency",
    "electromagnetic field",
    "membrane",
    "action potential",
    "ionic current",
    "electroporation",
    "athermal bioeffect",
    "modeling"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": []
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: Not supplied
PubMed: 11285841

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library