[Effects of power frequency magnetic field on gap junction intercellular communication of astrocytes].
← Research streamTPA (3 ng/ml for 1 hour) reduced CFIRR compared with control (median 4.53%/min vs 9.74%/min; P<0.005). Exposure to 50 Hz magnetic field at 0.8 or 1.6 mT for 24 hours did not significantly change CFIRR versus control (P>0.05). Pre-exposure to 0.8 or 1.6 mT for…
Study snapshot
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In order to explore if power frequency magnetic field (PFMF) can act as cancer promoter or be synergistic with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (TPA) in cancer promotion, the effects of 50 Hz MF on gap junction intercellular communication (GJIC) of astrocytes were observed. METHODS: Fluorescence redistribution after photobleaching (FRAP) was adopted to observe the recovery of fluorescence intensity in the bleached cells thus to estimate intercellular communication by gap junction. Comparative fluorescence intensity recovery rate (CFIRR) was as evaluation index. The effects of 50 Hz MF alone or with TPA on GJIC of astrocytes were studied. RESULTS: After 3 ng/ml TPA treatment for 1 hour, M(d) of CFIRR was 4.53%/min, whereas that in the control group was 9.74%/min (H = 12.084, P < 0.005). After exposure to 0.8 and 1.6 mT magnetic field for 24 hours respectively, M(d) of CFIRR was 8.25%/min and 6.68%/min respectively, no significant difference from that of control (H = 32.617, P > 0.05). After exposure to 0.8 and 1.6 mT magnetic field for 23 hours then combined with 3 ng/ml TPA treatment for 1 hour, M(d) of CFIRR was 3.32%/min and 2.85%/min respectively, also no significant difference from that in the group treated with 3 ng/ml TPA alone (H = 2.589, P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: 50 Hz MF (within 0 - 1.6 mT) alone could not inhibit GJIC of astrocytes; with TPA, could not enhance the inhibition of TPA on GJIC of astrocytes. But with MF intensity increasing, the inhibition of MF on GJIC showed elevated tendency.
AI evidence extraction
Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.
Main findings
TPA (3 ng/ml for 1 hour) reduced CFIRR compared with control (median 4.53%/min vs 9.74%/min; P<0.005). Exposure to 50 Hz magnetic field at 0.8 or 1.6 mT for 24 hours did not significantly change CFIRR versus control (P>0.05). Pre-exposure to 0.8 or 1.6 mT for 23 hours followed by TPA for 1 hour did not significantly differ from TPA alone (P>0.05).
Outcomes measured
- Gap junction intercellular communication (GJIC)
- Comparative fluorescence intensity recovery rate (CFIRR) via FRAP
Limitations
- In vitro study (astrocyte culture), not directly generalizable to humans
- Sample size and replication details not reported in abstract
- Only two magnetic flux densities tested (0.8 and 1.6 mT) and one exposure duration
- Conclusion notes a trend with increasing intensity, but statistical significance for a trend is not provided
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "in_vitro",
"exposure": {
"band": "ELF",
"source": null,
"frequency_mhz": 0.05,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": "24 hours (MF alone); 23 hours MF then 1 hour TPA"
},
"population": "Astrocytes (cell culture)",
"sample_size": null,
"outcomes": [
"Gap junction intercellular communication (GJIC)",
"Comparative fluorescence intensity recovery rate (CFIRR) via FRAP"
],
"main_findings": "TPA (3 ng/ml for 1 hour) reduced CFIRR compared with control (median 4.53%/min vs 9.74%/min; P<0.005). Exposure to 50 Hz magnetic field at 0.8 or 1.6 mT for 24 hours did not significantly change CFIRR versus control (P>0.05). Pre-exposure to 0.8 or 1.6 mT for 23 hours followed by TPA for 1 hour did not significantly differ from TPA alone (P>0.05).",
"effect_direction": "no_effect",
"limitations": [
"In vitro study (astrocyte culture), not directly generalizable to humans",
"Sample size and replication details not reported in abstract",
"Only two magnetic flux densities tested (0.8 and 1.6 mT) and one exposure duration",
"Conclusion notes a trend with increasing intensity, but statistical significance for a trend is not provided"
],
"evidence_strength": "low",
"confidence": 0.78,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"50 Hz",
"power frequency magnetic field",
"ELF magnetic field",
"astrocytes",
"gap junction intercellular communication",
"GJIC",
"FRAP",
"CFIRR",
"TPA",
"cancer promotion"
],
"suggested_hubs": [
{
"slug": "occupational-exposure",
"weight": 0.35,
"reason": "Published in an industrial hygiene/occupational diseases journal and examines power-frequency magnetic field exposure."
}
]
}AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.
Identifiers and source
DOI: Not supplied
PubMed: 14761537
Related papers
- Weak power frequency magnetic fields induce microtubule cytoskeleton reorganization depending on epidermal growth factor receptor & calcium signaling 2018
- Exploring Non-Thermal Mechanisms of Biological Reactions to Extremely Low-Frequency Magnetic 2024
- Critical role of model organism selection in assessing weak urban electromagnetic field effects: 2024
- 50 Hz magnetic field influences caspase-3 activity and cell cycle distribution in ionizing radiation 2024
- Investigation of Fetuin-A pathway in diabetes mellitus formation in rats exposed to ELF magnetic fields 2022
- Exposure to 10 Hz Pulsed Magnetic Fields Do Not Induce Cellular Senescence in Human Fetal Lung Fibroblasts 2021