Recovery of small-sized blood vessels in ischemic bone under static magnetic field.
← Research streamIn an ischemic rat femur model, bones implanted with a magnetized samarium-cobalt rod showed a larger amount of trapped microspheres than bones with an unmagnetized rod in proximal and distal regions (reported as significant in the proximal region, P<0.05). N…
Study snapshot
Abstract
Effects of static magnetic field (SMF) on the vascularization in bone were evaluated using an ischemic bone model, where rat femoral artery was ligated. Magnetized and unmagnetized samarium-cobalt rods were implanted transcortically into the middle diaphysis of the ischemic femurs. Collateral circulation was evaluated by injection of microspheres into the abdominal aorta at the third week after ligation. It was found that the bone implanted with a magnetized rod showed a larger amount of trapped microspheres than that with an unmagnetized rod at the proximal and the distal region (P < 0.05 proximal region). There were no significant differences at the middle and the distal region. This tendency was similar to that of the bone mineral density in the SMF-exposed ischemic bone.
AI evidence extraction
Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.
Main findings
In an ischemic rat femur model, bones implanted with a magnetized samarium-cobalt rod showed a larger amount of trapped microspheres than bones with an unmagnetized rod in proximal and distal regions (reported as significant in the proximal region, P<0.05). No significant differences were observed at the middle and distal regions. A similar tendency was reported for bone mineral density in SMF-exposed ischemic bone.
Outcomes measured
- Collateral circulation in ischemic bone (microsphere trapping)
- Bone mineral density
Limitations
- Sample size not reported in abstract
- Static magnetic field strength/exposure level not reported
- Significance reporting appears inconsistent across regions (e.g., distal described as larger but also described as not significantly different)
- Animal ischemic bone model; generalizability to humans not addressed in abstract
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "animal",
"exposure": {
"band": "static",
"source": "implanted magnetized samarium-cobalt rod",
"frequency_mhz": null,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": "3 weeks after femoral artery ligation (assessment timepoint)"
},
"population": "Rats with ischemic femur (femoral artery ligation model)",
"sample_size": null,
"outcomes": [
"Collateral circulation in ischemic bone (microsphere trapping)",
"Bone mineral density"
],
"main_findings": "In an ischemic rat femur model, bones implanted with a magnetized samarium-cobalt rod showed a larger amount of trapped microspheres than bones with an unmagnetized rod in proximal and distal regions (reported as significant in the proximal region, P<0.05). No significant differences were observed at the middle and distal regions. A similar tendency was reported for bone mineral density in SMF-exposed ischemic bone.",
"effect_direction": "mixed",
"limitations": [
"Sample size not reported in abstract",
"Static magnetic field strength/exposure level not reported",
"Significance reporting appears inconsistent across regions (e.g., distal described as larger but also described as not significantly different)",
"Animal ischemic bone model; generalizability to humans not addressed in abstract"
],
"evidence_strength": "low",
"confidence": 0.74,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"static magnetic field",
"ischemic bone",
"rat model",
"femoral artery ligation",
"samarium-cobalt magnet",
"vascularization",
"collateral circulation",
"microspheres",
"bone mineral density"
],
"suggested_hubs": [
{
"slug": "animal-studies",
"weight": 0.9,
"reason": "Rat ischemic bone model evaluating effects of static magnetic field exposure."
}
]
}AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.
Identifiers and source
DOI: 10.1093/ecam/nel055
PubMed: 17342242
Related papers
- Treatment of experimental inflammatory synovitis with continuous magnetic field. 1996
- Neurobiological effects and mechanisms of magnetic fields: a review from 2000 to 2023 2024
- Static magnetic fields as a factor in modification of tissue and cell structure: a review 2024
- Impact of weak radiofrequency and static magnetic fields on key signaling molecules, intracellular pH, membrane potential, and cell growth in HT-1080 fibrosarcoma cells 2023
- Zebrafish Larval Melanophores Respond to Electromagnetic Fields Exposure 2023
- Exposure to a static magnetic field attenuates hepatic damage and function abnormality in obese and diabetic mice 2023