Exposure to an additional alternating magnetic field affects comb building by worker hornets.
← Research streamWorker hornets exposed in an artificial breeding box to an additional 50 Hz AC magnetic field (B = 50–70 mGauss) built combs differently than controls exposed only to the natural terrestrial magnetic field. Reported effects included 35–55% fewer cells and few…
Study snapshot
Abstract
Oriental hornet workers, kept in an Artificial Breeding Box (ABB) without a queen, construct within a few days brood combs of hexagonal cells with apertures facing down. These combs possess stems that fasten the former to the roof of the ABB. In an ABB with adult workers (more than 24 h after eclosion), exposed to an AC (50 Hz) magnetic field of a magnitude of B = 50-70 mGauss, the combs and cells are built differently from those of a control ABB, subjected only to the natural terrestrial magnetic field. The effects of the additional magnetic field consist of (a) 35-55% smaller number of cells and fewer eggs in each comb, (b) disrupted symmetry of building, with many deformed and imperfectly hexagonal cells, and (c) more delicate and slender comb stems.
AI evidence extraction
Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.
Main findings
Worker hornets exposed in an artificial breeding box to an additional 50 Hz AC magnetic field (B = 50–70 mGauss) built combs differently than controls exposed only to the natural terrestrial magnetic field. Reported effects included 35–55% fewer cells and fewer eggs per comb, disrupted symmetry with deformed/imperfectly hexagonal cells, and more delicate/slender comb stems.
Outcomes measured
- Comb building (number of cells)
- Eggs per comb
- Cell symmetry/morphology (deformed/imperfectly hexagonal cells)
- Comb stem morphology (delicate/slender stems)
Limitations
- No sample size reported in the abstract.
- Exposure duration not reported in the abstract.
- Study context is an artificial breeding box without a queen; generalizability to natural colonies is unclear from the abstract.
- No statistical methods or variability measures described in the abstract.
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "animal",
"exposure": {
"band": "ELF",
"source": "other",
"frequency_mhz": 0.05,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": null
},
"population": "Oriental hornet workers (kept in an Artificial Breeding Box without a queen)",
"sample_size": null,
"outcomes": [
"Comb building (number of cells)",
"Eggs per comb",
"Cell symmetry/morphology (deformed/imperfectly hexagonal cells)",
"Comb stem morphology (delicate/slender stems)"
],
"main_findings": "Worker hornets exposed in an artificial breeding box to an additional 50 Hz AC magnetic field (B = 50–70 mGauss) built combs differently than controls exposed only to the natural terrestrial magnetic field. Reported effects included 35–55% fewer cells and fewer eggs per comb, disrupted symmetry with deformed/imperfectly hexagonal cells, and more delicate/slender comb stems.",
"effect_direction": "harm",
"limitations": [
"No sample size reported in the abstract.",
"Exposure duration not reported in the abstract.",
"Study context is an artificial breeding box without a queen; generalizability to natural colonies is unclear from the abstract.",
"No statistical methods or variability measures described in the abstract."
],
"evidence_strength": "low",
"confidence": 0.74,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"oriental hornet",
"worker hornets",
"comb building",
"alternating magnetic field",
"AC magnetic field",
"50 Hz",
"ELF magnetic field",
"brood comb",
"cell morphology"
],
"suggested_hubs": [
{
"slug": "occupational-exposure",
"weight": 0.2,
"reason": "ELF 50 Hz magnetic-field exposure is described, but the setting is experimental/animal rather than a clear occupational scenario."
}
]
}AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.
Identifiers and source
DOI: Not supplied
PubMed: 18613641
Related papers
- Magnetotactic advantage in stable sediment by long-term observations of magnetotactic bacteria in Earth's field, zero field and alternating field 2022
- Efficient DNA ligation by selective heating of DNA ligase with a radio frequency alternating magnetic field. 2016
- Targeted Magnetic Nanoparticles for Mechanical Lysis of Tumor Cells by Low-Amplitude Alternating Magnetic Field. 2016
- [The influence of alternating magnetic field on in vitro litholysis of uroliths in blemaren water solutions]. 2016
- Magnetic Nanoparticles with High Specific Absorption Rate at Low Alternating Magnetic Field. 2015
- [Modulating effect of weak combined magnetic fields on duration of mealworm beetle Tenebrio molitor metamorphosis stage]. 2014