Isolated Atrial Lead Conduction Delay following Right Atrial Radiofrequency Maze Procedure.

ISRN cardiology · 2011 · Harm · Very low evidence

← Research stream
HarmVery low evidencePaper 3230

After septal myectomy and a radiofrequency maze procedure, a persistent delay in atrial sensing was observed, most likely due to iatrogenic conduction delay from right atrial ablation lines. The report suggests atrial conduction properties can be altered duri…

Study snapshot

PublicationISRN cardiology · 2011
Study typecase_report
Reported directionHarm
Evidence ratingVery low

Abstract

A 60-year-old man with a dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator and severe dyspnea on exertion due to apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy underwent a septal myectomy and radiofrequency maze procedure. Following the procedure a persistent delay in atrial sensing was observed and was most likely a result of iatrogenic conduction delay from right atrial ablation lines. These observations suggest that atrial conduction properties can be altered during the surgical maze procedure and should be considered in the differential diagnosis of sensing or pacing malfunction.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typecase_report
Effect directionharm
Population60-year-old man with a dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator and apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Sample size1
ExposureNot supplied
Evidence strengthVery lowConfidence: 74% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

After septal myectomy and a radiofrequency maze procedure, a persistent delay in atrial sensing was observed, most likely due to iatrogenic conduction delay from right atrial ablation lines. The report suggests atrial conduction properties can be altered during surgical maze procedures and may contribute to apparent sensing/pacing malfunction.

Outcomes measured

  • atrial sensing delay
  • iatrogenic atrial conduction delay
  • sensing or pacing malfunction considerations

Limitations

  • Single-patient case report
  • No radiofrequency exposure parameters (e.g., frequency, power, duration) reported
  • Causality inferred as most likely; no confirmatory testing described in abstract
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "case_report",
  "exposure": {
    "band": null,
    "source": "radiofrequency maze procedure (right atrial ablation lines)",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": "60-year-old man with a dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator and apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy",
  "sample_size": 1,
  "outcomes": [
    "atrial sensing delay",
    "iatrogenic atrial conduction delay",
    "sensing or pacing malfunction considerations"
  ],
  "main_findings": "After septal myectomy and a radiofrequency maze procedure, a persistent delay in atrial sensing was observed, most likely due to iatrogenic conduction delay from right atrial ablation lines. The report suggests atrial conduction properties can be altered during surgical maze procedures and may contribute to apparent sensing/pacing malfunction.",
  "effect_direction": "harm",
  "limitations": [
    "Single-patient case report",
    "No radiofrequency exposure parameters (e.g., frequency, power, duration) reported",
    "Causality inferred as most likely; no confirmatory testing described in abstract"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "very_low",
  "confidence": 0.74,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "radiofrequency maze",
    "right atrial ablation",
    "atrial lead",
    "conduction delay",
    "atrial sensing",
    "implantable cardioverter defibrillator",
    "hypertrophic cardiomyopathy"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": []
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.5402/2011/475796
PubMed: 22347644

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library