iPhone 12 MagSafe technology and cardiac implantable devices: assessment of the actual risk

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE · 2022 · Harm · Low evidence

← Research stream

HarmLow evidencePaper 916

In bench testing of 12 cardiac implantable devices, the magnets inside iPhone 12 triggered magnetic mode up to a distance of 1 cm. The authors conclude that a 15 cm separation distance (per Apple guidance) is compatible with their results and manufacturer ind…

Study snapshot

PublicationPacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE · 2022

Study typeexposure_assessment

Reported directionHarm

Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

iPhone 12 MagSafe technology and cardiac implantable devices: assessment of the actual risk Federica Censi, Eugenio Mattei, Graziano Onder, Giovanni Calcagnini. iPhone 12 MagSafe technology and cardiac implantable devices: assessment of the actual risk. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2022 Jan 25. doi: 10.1111/pace.14450. Abstract Background: Pacemaker (PM) and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) are equipped with a magnetic sensor activated by external application of magnets to easily manage some functions of these devices. If activated inadvertently or outside a controlled environment and without the supervision of clinical personnel, this magnetic mode introduces a potential risk. In reality, the possibility of a static magnetic field affecting a PM or ICD is remote. However, the presence of the magnet in the iPhone 12 made the possibility of inadvertently activating the magnetic switch of PM and ICD less remote. Objective: This study investigates the effects of magnetic interference of the iPhone 12 on a large set of cardiac implantable devices representative of the current market and proposes adequate rules of conduct. Methods: We investigated the risk of the magnetic interference of the iPhone 12 and its MagSafe accessories on a comprehensive set of PMs and ICDs, including the subcutaneous ICD. For the first time, the magnetic interference phenomena were correlated with the magnetic field levels measured all around iPhone 12. Results: We discovered that the magnets inside iPhone 12 trigger the magnetic mode in the 12 tested devices up to a distance of 1 cm. Conclusions: Considering the implications related to the activation of the magnetic switch, to date, it is advisable to follow Apple's indications relating to the safety distance of 15 cm, which is widely compatible with the results obtained from this paper and in line with the indications provided by the implantable cardiac device manufacturers. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov Excerpts "Apple also found it appropriate to emphasize in the instructions for use that “Medical devices such as implanted pacemakers and defibrillators may contain sensors capable of reacting to magnets and radio frequencies when in close contact. To avoid potential interactions with these devices, keep your iPhone and MagSafe accessories at a safe distance from the device (more than 15 centimeters away, or more than 30 centimeters if wireless charging is activated). [15] Considering the implications related to the activation of the magnetic switch of cardiac implantable devices, as a rule of conduct, to date, it is advisable to follow Apple's indications relating to the safety distance of 15 cm, which are widely compatible with the results obtained from this paper and in line with the indications provided by the manufacturers of the implantable cardiac devices. However, since in real-life scenarios such distance is not always respected, it would be advisable to alert the patient about this specific iPhone 12 concern. Also, it would be important to investigate this question further for the new iPhone models, as long as they still remain MagSafe compatible."

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeexposure_assessment

Effect directionharm

PopulationNot supplied

Sample size12

ExposureNot supplied

Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 74% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

Outcomes measured

Magnetic mode activation (magnetic switch triggering) in pacemakers (PM) and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD), including subcutaneous ICD
Distance threshold for magnetic interference
Magnetic field levels measured around iPhone 12 (correlated with interference)

View raw extracted JSON

{
  "study_type": "exposure_assessment",
  "exposure": {
    "band": null,
    "source": "iPhone 12 MagSafe magnets (static magnetic field) and MagSafe accessories",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": null,
  "sample_size": 12,
  "outcomes": [
    "Magnetic mode activation (magnetic switch triggering) in pacemakers (PM) and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD), including subcutaneous ICD",
    "Distance threshold for magnetic interference",
    "Magnetic field levels measured around iPhone 12 (correlated with interference)"
  ],
  "main_findings": "In bench testing of 12 cardiac implantable devices, the magnets inside iPhone 12 triggered magnetic mode up to a distance of 1 cm. The authors conclude that a 15 cm separation distance (per Apple guidance) is compatible with their results and manufacturer indications.",
  "effect_direction": "harm",
  "limitations": [],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.74,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "iPhone 12",
    "MagSafe",
    "static magnetic field",
    "magnetic interference",
    "pacemaker",
    "implantable cardioverter defibrillator",
    "subcutaneous ICD",
    "magnetic switch",
    "safety distance"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "medical-implants",
      "weight": 0.95,
      "reason": "Assesses magnetic interference risk of iPhone 12 MagSafe with pacemakers and ICDs."
    }
  ]
}

AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1111/pace.14450
PubMed: 35076120

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library