Electromagnetic interference to infusion pumps. Update2008 from GSM mobile phones.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2008 · Mixed · Low evidence

← Research stream
MixedLow evidencePaper 2838

Compared with results from a 2005 survey, the observed rate of infusion pump failure with GSM phone exposure decreased from 58% to 30%. The authors report that WiFi and DECT use did not pose a real risk to infusion systems.

Study snapshot

PublicationAnnual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2008
Study typeengineering
Reported directionMixed
Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

Electromagnetic interference (EMI) to critical care medical devices has been reported by various groups. Previuos study demonstrated that infusion pumps are susceptible of false alarm buzzing and block of infusion, when exposed to various EMI sources. Aim of this paper is to investigate the changes in the risk of EMI from the estimates of our previous 2005 survey and to extend the EMI risk assessment to newer telecommunication products: DECT phones and WiFi terminals. With regards to GSM phones, compare to the results obtained in 2005, we observed a decrease in the rate of failure (from 58% to 30%). From our findings, the use of WiFi and DECT does not pose a real risk to infusion systems.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeengineering
Effect directionmixed
PopulationNot supplied
Sample sizeNot supplied
ExposureRF
Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 74% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

Compared with results from a 2005 survey, the observed rate of infusion pump failure with GSM phone exposure decreased from 58% to 30%. The authors report that WiFi and DECT use did not pose a real risk to infusion systems.

Outcomes measured

  • Electromagnetic interference (EMI) to infusion pumps
  • False alarm buzzing
  • Block of infusion
  • Rate of failure compared with 2005 survey

Limitations

  • No sample size reported in abstract
  • No exposure metrics (frequency, distance, power/SAR, duration) reported in abstract
  • Methods and testing conditions not described in abstract
  • Outcome definitions and statistical analysis not described in abstract
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "engineering",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "RF",
    "source": "mobile phone / DECT phone / WiFi terminal",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": null,
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "Electromagnetic interference (EMI) to infusion pumps",
    "False alarm buzzing",
    "Block of infusion",
    "Rate of failure compared with 2005 survey"
  ],
  "main_findings": "Compared with results from a 2005 survey, the observed rate of infusion pump failure with GSM phone exposure decreased from 58% to 30%. The authors report that WiFi and DECT use did not pose a real risk to infusion systems.",
  "effect_direction": "mixed",
  "limitations": [
    "No sample size reported in abstract",
    "No exposure metrics (frequency, distance, power/SAR, duration) reported in abstract",
    "Methods and testing conditions not described in abstract",
    "Outcome definitions and statistical analysis not described in abstract"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.74,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "electromagnetic interference",
    "EMI",
    "infusion pumps",
    "critical care medical devices",
    "GSM",
    "mobile phones",
    "DECT",
    "WiFi"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "school-wi-fi",
      "weight": 0.2,
      "reason": "Includes WiFi terminals as an exposure source, though in a medical device EMI context rather than schools."
    },
    {
      "slug": "who-icnirp",
      "weight": 0.1,
      "reason": "General RF exposure/EMI topic; no explicit WHO/ICNIRP mention in abstract."
    }
  ]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1109/iembs.2008.4650213
PubMed: 19163716

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library