Surface-induced nonlinearities of liquid crystals driven by an electric field.

Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics · 2008 · Mixed · Insufficient evidence

← Research stream
MixedInsufficient evidencePaper 2793

A static electric field (low voltage, below the Fredericks transition threshold) altered the huge optical nonlinearity of methyl-red doped nematic liquid crystals by orders of magnitude. Experimental data were fit by a model incorporating modulation of surfac…

Study snapshot

PublicationPhysical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics · 2008
Study typeother
Reported directionMixed
Evidence ratingInsufficient

Abstract

We report the study of the effect of a static electric field on the huge optical nonlinearity of methyl-red doped nematic liquid crystals. Experimental data are well fitted using a theoretical model that takes into account the modulation of the surface charge density due to the impinging light beam. It is demonstrated that the optical nonlinearity can be varied by orders of magnitude with application of a low voltage below the threshold of the Fredericks transition. These results confirm the previously proposed model of surface induced nonlinear effects.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeother
Effect directionmixed
PopulationNot supplied
Sample sizeNot supplied
ExposureNot supplied
Evidence strengthInsufficientConfidence: 74% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

A static electric field (low voltage, below the Fredericks transition threshold) altered the huge optical nonlinearity of methyl-red doped nematic liquid crystals by orders of magnitude. Experimental data were fit by a model incorporating modulation of surface charge density due to the impinging light beam, supporting a surface-induced nonlinear effects model.

Outcomes measured

  • optical nonlinearity (methyl-red doped nematic liquid crystals)
  • surface charge density modulation

Limitations

  • No exposure parameters (field strength/voltage details) reported in the abstract beyond 'low voltage' and 'static electric field'.
  • No sample size or replication details provided in the abstract.
  • Study concerns material/optical properties in liquid crystals rather than health outcomes.
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "other",
  "exposure": {
    "band": null,
    "source": "static electric field (low voltage)",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": null,
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "optical nonlinearity (methyl-red doped nematic liquid crystals)",
    "surface charge density modulation"
  ],
  "main_findings": "A static electric field (low voltage, below the Fredericks transition threshold) altered the huge optical nonlinearity of methyl-red doped nematic liquid crystals by orders of magnitude. Experimental data were fit by a model incorporating modulation of surface charge density due to the impinging light beam, supporting a surface-induced nonlinear effects model.",
  "effect_direction": "mixed",
  "limitations": [
    "No exposure parameters (field strength/voltage details) reported in the abstract beyond 'low voltage' and 'static electric field'.",
    "No sample size or replication details provided in the abstract.",
    "Study concerns material/optical properties in liquid crystals rather than health outcomes."
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "insufficient",
  "confidence": 0.74,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "static electric field",
    "liquid crystals",
    "nematic",
    "methyl-red doped",
    "optical nonlinearity",
    "surface charge density",
    "Fredericks transition"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": []
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1103/physreve.78.061706
PubMed: 19256857

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library