Duration-dependent effect of exposure to static electric field on learning and memory ability in mice

2018 · Mixed · Low evidence

← Research stream

MixedLow evidencePaper 2073

Study snapshot

Publicationmanual · 2018

Study typeanimal

Reported directionMixed

Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

Duration-dependent effect of exposure to static electric field on learning and memory ability in mice Xu Y, Gu X, Di G. Duration-dependent effect of exposure to static electric field on learning and memory ability in mice. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Jun 7. Abstract With the rapid development of ultra-high-voltage direct-current (UHVDC) transmission, the strength of environmental static electric field (SEF) around UHVDC transmission lines increased substantially, which has aroused widely public attention on the potential health effects of SEF. In this study, the effect of SEF exposure on learning and memory ability was investigated. Institute of Cancer Research mice were exposed to 56.3 kV/m SEF for a short term (7 days) or long term (49 days). Behaviors in the Morris water maze (MWM) test, hippocampal neurotransmitter contents, and oxidative stress indicators were examined. Results showed that short-term SEF exposure significantly prolonged escape latency and decreased the number of platform-site crossovers, as well as decreased the time spent in the target quadrant in the MWM test. Meanwhile, serotonin level and the ratio of glutamate level to γ-aminobutyric acid level changed significantly. Besides, malondialdehyde content and glutathione peroxidase activity increased significantly, while superoxide dismutase activity decreased significantly. After long-term SEF exposure, all indices above showed no significant differences between the SEF and sham exposure groups. These data indicated that short-term exposure to 56.3 kV/m SEF could cause abnormal neurotransmitter levels and oxidative stress in the hippocampus, which led to the decline in learning and memory ability. Under the condition of long-term exposure, the SEF-induced disturbances in neurotransmitter contents and redox balance were offset by the compensatory responses of mice, and thus, the learning and memory ability returned to normal level. The temporary and reversible decline in learning and memory ability was only a common biological effect of SEF rather than a health hazard. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeanimal

Effect directionmixed

PopulationInstitute of Cancer Research mice

Sample sizeNot supplied

Exposureother · 7 days (short term) or 49 days (long term)

Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 74% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

Mice exposed to a 56.3 kV/m static electric field for 7 days showed worse Morris water maze performance (prolonged escape latency, fewer platform-site crossovers, less time in target quadrant) along with significant changes in hippocampal serotonin and glutamate/GABA ratio and oxidative stress markers (increased malondialdehyde and glutathione peroxidase activity; decreased superoxide dismutase activity). After 49 days of exposure, these indices showed no significant differences versus sham.

Outcomes measured

Learning and memory performance (Morris water maze: escape latency, platform-site crossovers, time in target quadrant)
Hippocampal neurotransmitter contents (serotonin; glutamate/γ-aminobutyric acid ratio)
Oxidative stress indicators (malondialdehyde, glutathione peroxidase activity, superoxide dismutase activity)

Limitations

Sample size not reported in provided abstract/metadata
Mechanistic interpretation (e.g., compensatory responses; not a health hazard) is asserted but not directly testable from the reported endpoints in the abstract

View raw extracted JSON

{
  "study_type": "animal",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "other",
    "source": "ultra-high-voltage direct-current (UHVDC) transmission lines / environmental static electric field",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": "7 days (short term) or 49 days (long term)"
  },
  "population": "Institute of Cancer Research mice",
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "Learning and memory performance (Morris water maze: escape latency, platform-site crossovers, time in target quadrant)",
    "Hippocampal neurotransmitter contents (serotonin; glutamate/γ-aminobutyric acid ratio)",
    "Oxidative stress indicators (malondialdehyde, glutathione peroxidase activity, superoxide dismutase activity)"
  ],
  "main_findings": "Mice exposed to a 56.3 kV/m static electric field for 7 days showed worse Morris water maze performance (prolonged escape latency, fewer platform-site crossovers, less time in target quadrant) along with significant changes in hippocampal serotonin and glutamate/GABA ratio and oxidative stress markers (increased malondialdehyde and glutathione peroxidase activity; decreased superoxide dismutase activity). After 49 days of exposure, these indices showed no significant differences versus sham.",
  "effect_direction": "mixed",
  "limitations": [
    "Sample size not reported in provided abstract/metadata",
    "Mechanistic interpretation (e.g., compensatory responses; not a health hazard) is asserted but not directly testable from the reported endpoints in the abstract"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.74,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "static electric field",
    "UHVDC transmission",
    "mice",
    "learning and memory",
    "Morris water maze",
    "hippocampus",
    "serotonin",
    "glutamate",
    "GABA",
    "oxidative stress",
    "malondialdehyde",
    "glutathione peroxidase",
    "superoxide dismutase"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "occupational-exposure",
      "weight": 0.32,
      "reason": "Exposure context is static electric fields around UHVDC transmission lines, relevant to environmental/utility-line exposure scenarios."
    }
  ]
}

AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: Not supplied
PubMed: Not supplied

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library