Human achromatic flickers and phosphenes thresholds under extremely low frequency electric stimulations
← Research streamIn 20 volunteers receiving non-invasive transcranial alternating current stimulation (0–2 mA) at 20, 50, 60, and 100 Hz, stimulation intensity significantly affected phosphene perception across frequencies. The lowest perception threshold occurred at 20 Hz, a…
Study snapshot
Abstract
Category: Neuroscience Tags: electromagnetic fields, ELF, health risk, phosphenes, visual perception, electric stimulation, exposure guidelines DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-06271-8 URL: nature.com Overview Human exposure to extremely low-frequency (< 300 Hz) electric and magnetic fields can cause a distinct stroboscopic visual sensation known as electro/magneto phosphenes. The induction of these visual effects represents one of the most comprehensively documented outcomes of in-situ electric field interaction with human tissues. Notably, international safety guidelines use phosphenes as a key biological marker to set exposure limits for extremely low-frequency (ELF) electric and magnetic fields. Methods - Objective: Estimate the location (locus) and threshold for perceiving phosphenes during electric current stimulation at four frequencies: 20, 50, 60, and 100 Hz. - Participants: 20 volunteers underwent non-invasive transcranial alternating current stimulation, ranging from 0 to 2 mA at the specified frequencies. - Analysis: Logistic regressions were used on perceptual data to calculate probabilities of phosphene perception, and dosimetry analyses quantified in-situ electric field levels in the retina. Findings - The intensity of the stimulation current had a significant impact on phosphene perception across all frequencies. - The lowest threshold for phosphene perception occurred at 20 Hz. - No perceivable phosphenes were reported at 100 Hz. - The data reinforces the retinal origin of phosphenes and highlights the sensitivity of the human visual system to ELF electric stimulation. Conclusion These results are vital for decoding the underlying mechanisms of phosphene induction due to ELF field exposure. Furthermore, the identified perception thresholds and trends offer essential insights to inform revisions of international safety standards for human exposure to electromagnetic fields. Importantly, this study underscores a clear connection between ELF field exposure and specific neurological responses, signifying the necessity for cautious exposure limits to protect public health.
AI evidence extraction
Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.
Main findings
In 20 volunteers receiving non-invasive transcranial alternating current stimulation (0–2 mA) at 20, 50, 60, and 100 Hz, stimulation intensity significantly affected phosphene perception across frequencies. The lowest perception threshold occurred at 20 Hz, and no perceivable phosphenes were reported at 100 Hz; dosimetry analyses supported a retinal origin of the phosphenes.
Outcomes measured
- phosphene perception threshold
- phosphene perception probability
- locus/location of phosphene perception (retinal origin)
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "other",
"exposure": {
"band": "ELF",
"source": "electric stimulation",
"frequency_mhz": null,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": null
},
"population": "20 volunteers",
"sample_size": 20,
"outcomes": [
"phosphene perception threshold",
"phosphene perception probability",
"locus/location of phosphene perception (retinal origin)"
],
"main_findings": "In 20 volunteers receiving non-invasive transcranial alternating current stimulation (0–2 mA) at 20, 50, 60, and 100 Hz, stimulation intensity significantly affected phosphene perception across frequencies. The lowest perception threshold occurred at 20 Hz, and no perceivable phosphenes were reported at 100 Hz; dosimetry analyses supported a retinal origin of the phosphenes.",
"effect_direction": "mixed",
"limitations": [],
"evidence_strength": "low",
"confidence": 0.74,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"extremely low frequency",
"ELF",
"electric stimulation",
"transcranial alternating current stimulation",
"tACS",
"phosphenes",
"magnetophosphenes",
"electrophosphenes",
"visual perception",
"retina",
"exposure guidelines",
"safety standards"
],
"suggested_hubs": [
{
"slug": "who-icnirp",
"weight": 0.62,
"reason": "Abstract explicitly links phosphene thresholds to international safety guidelines for ELF electric and magnetic fields."
}
]
}AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.
Identifiers and source
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-06271-8
PubMed: Not supplied
Related papers
- Magnetic fields from indoor transformer stations and risk of cancer in adults: a cohort study 2024
- Extremely low frequency magnetic fields emitted by cell phones 2023
- Estimating exposure to extremely low frequency magnetic fields near high-voltage power lines and assessment of possible increased cancer risk among Slovenian children and adolescents 2023
- Suppression of Glucocorticoid Response in Stressed Mice Using 50 Hz Electric Field According to Immobilization Degree and Posture 2022
- Is extremely low frequency pulsed electromagnetic fields (EMF) applicable to gliomas? A literature review of underlying mechanisms and application of extremely low frequency pulsed EMF 2022
- Genotoxic effects of electromagnetic field radiations from mobile phones (Review) 2022